• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

immigration issues in the lame duck session

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
#1
11-08-2010, 03:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
Full Article:
http://www.ilw.com/articles/2010,1104-siskind.shtm

Most salient points in qt/unqt:

QT
We could see some immediate action on immigration issues in the lame duck session that will be called shortly by Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi. Senator Reid has already said he intends to re-introduce the DREAM Act and he needs just four votes to get the bill over the finish line. It is possible that he could get a few of the departing Senators to change their votes. Perhaps he can get Senators Voinovich, Bennett, Brownback, Gregg, LeMieux, or Lincoln to change their votes. All are theoretically "yes" votes. Or he might have a shot at getting New England Senators Brown, Snowe and Collins to reconsider. And the one no-show on the last vote was Lisa Murkowski, previously a moderate on immigration who has told Alaska's Democrats that in exchange for sending her back to Congress as a write-in independent candidate, she would think independently. So maybe she is persuadable.
UNQT

Call and remind Reid to keep his promise.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#2
11-08-2010, 04:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
728 posts
hgr1915
0 AP
This is the best case scenario!!!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hgr1915
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hgr1915
Find all posts by hgr1915
#3
11-08-2010, 05:22 PM
Senior Member
From Hollywood, FL
Joined in Jul 2010
2,022 posts
hooligan111988's Avatar
hooligan111988
20 AP
the kind of scenarios that don't exist in the senate...hahaha
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hooligan111988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hooligan111988
Find all posts by hooligan111988
#4
11-08-2010, 08:29 PM
Senior Member
From Brooklyn NY
Joined in Feb 2009
676 posts
Alex's Avatar
Alex
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan111988 View Post
the kind of scenarios that don't exist in the senate...hahaha
y do u say that?
__________________
IUF
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Alex
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Alex
Find all posts by Alex
#5
11-08-2010, 09:30 PM
Moderator
From Illinois/Florida
Joined in Jul 2009
2,219 posts
buckminsterfullerene's Avatar
buckminsterfullerene
270 AP
there is a strategic benefit in putting the DA as early as they are comfortable with, the senator elect from Illinois which already said would vote no will miss a couple weeks for the lame duck sessions (lame duck starts on the 16th I think and he gets sworn in on the 29th), however, this could be very controversial, but, it was done once before to pass another controversial bill. My worry is that this time it could be controversial enough where if it does not pass this time it could hurt the any chances of the bill passing in the long run.

The outgoing senators have a good chance of putting a yes vote on a controversial bill without much repercussion, they will already be leaving, however, if they vote yes on this bill they could use this to try and get the hispanic vote if and when they decide to run again. There are several in there that were on the fence and could vote yes without appearing as flip-floppers (LeMieux for example)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
buckminsterfullerene
View Public Profile
Send a private message to buckminsterfullerene
Find all posts by buckminsterfullerene
#6
11-08-2010, 09:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
1,367 posts
Task_1539's Avatar
Task_1539
0 AP
Just pass the damn thing and give credit to democrats and republicans so Latino voters will migrate between the two.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Task_1539
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Task_1539
Find all posts by Task_1539
#7
11-08-2010, 11:50 PM
Senior Member
From Hollywood, FL
Joined in Jul 2010
2,022 posts
hooligan111988's Avatar
hooligan111988
20 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
y do u say that?

haha..idk why...it seems taht even if we have a lot of support and possible votes...its always a game to politicians.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hooligan111988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hooligan111988
Find all posts by hooligan111988
#8
11-09-2010, 12:01 AM
Senior Member
From Brooklyn NY
Joined in Feb 2009
676 posts
Alex's Avatar
Alex
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan111988 View Post
haha..idk why...it seems taht even if we have a lot of support and possible votes...its always a game to politicians.
i swear i wana punch u in the nose u jerkoff... u sacred me, i thought u had any idea what you talking about.

are u DA User's sister?
__________________
IUF
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Alex
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Alex
Find all posts by Alex
#9
11-09-2010, 12:34 AM
Senior Member
From Hollywood, FL
Joined in Jul 2010
2,022 posts
hooligan111988's Avatar
hooligan111988
20 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
y do u say that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
i swear i wana punch u in the nose u jerkoff... u sacred me, i thought u had any idea what you talking about.

are u DA User's sister?

lol..i thought the "hahaha" at the end of the comment would make it seem as if i wasnt serious...but for real tho...even if the DA passes the senate...i think itd go to the house next year and not this year...and that would really really suck
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hooligan111988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hooligan111988
Find all posts by hooligan111988
#10
11-09-2010, 02:48 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Why would House wait till next Congress. Guteirez is leading the way in House and Pelosi will bring it up after Senate passes it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.