• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Former McCain campaign staffer hopes he’ll back DREAM Act vote

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
#1
11-27-2010, 05:17 PM
Senior Member
From AZ
Joined in Jul 2009
455 posts
SuperGSPorty
60 AP
Quote:
Senate Republicans are ramping up their opposition to the DREAM Act, a bipartisan proposal that would extend a path to citizenship for immigrant youths who go to college or join the military.

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions released an opposition paper, published by Politico, that says the bill will legalize some immigrants who have committed misdemeanor violations and that 35 is too high an age ceiling for qualifying immigrants. Conservative pundit Michelle Malkin released a list of fence-sitting Republicans she encouraged readers to call and dissuade from supporting the measure.

Juan Hernandez, the leader of Conservatives for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, says his organization is also calling Republicans and some fence-sitting Democrats in Congress to try to convince them to vote for the bill, which Sen. Harry Reid has promised to bring to a vote as a stand-alone measure. In 2007, 52 senators voted to debate the bill, missing the 60-vote threshold to overcome a GOP filibuster. Since then, Republican Sens. Orrin Hatch and Kay Bailey Hutchison have switched their positions to no votes. Democratic Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson told Politico he would vote against cloture -- i.e., the suspension of further debate on the bill in order to sidestep a filibuster threat -- further putting a dent in the count. The Daily Caller attempted its own vote count, and concluded the chances for passage look slim.

The bill's bleak outlook shows how dramatically the consensus on immigration within the Republican Party has shifted in recent years. GOP Sen. John McCain, who co-sponsored a comprehensive immigration reform bill just a few years ago, has since taken a hard-line stance that emphasizes border security. Hernandez was McCain's volunteer Hispanic Outreach director during the 2008 presidential campaign, and says he still hopes McCain will change his mind.

"I believe that I know McCain's heart, and I believe that he will end up being at the end of the day someone who will have a legacy of supporting new Americans and supporting immigration reform," Hernandez said. "What is going on in his mind right now I don't know, but I've had too many conversations in which he's shown his heart to me and I believed him, and I will continue believing that he will end up being one of the champions for the new Americans."

Hernandez and Ali Noorani, the director of the pro-reform National Immigration Forum, both defended the bill's age ceiling of 35 years. The bill has been floating around Congress for about 10 years, they say, so lowering the age ceiling would leave qualifying youth who've been advocating for the bill for years in the lurch.

"I think individuals want to really nitpick this and say no, it should be 34, or no, it should be 30, or no, it should be 29," Hernandez said. "We haven't had any type of a legalization since 1986 with Reagan, so the idea is to make sure that every child who came in has a chance to prove him or herself" by serving in the military or attending college.

Undocumented college students in Texas have been pressuring Sen. Hutchison to support the measure with a 14-day hunger strike. Those under 35 who were brought to the country when they were 16 years old or younger and serve in the military or college for two years would be eligible for conditional legal status for six years. At the end of that period, they could then qualify to become permanent residents, provided that they have shown "good moral character," i.e. have acquired no serious criminal record. Sen. Richard Lugar, a Republican from Indiana, has introduced a new version of the bill that strips an earlier, controversial provision reversing a federal law that banned colleges from offering any benefit to illegal immigrants that it does not also provide to citizens.

"This is a very personal decision for these senators as they meet with and talk to these students," Noorani says. "They have a pretty big decision on their hands in the next couple weeks."
Let's still call, fax, email him maybe we can still convince him People, please feel optimistic and keep your hopes up. These next few weeks is probably our last chance to get the DREAM Act passed for a while.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
SuperGSPorty
View Public Profile
Send a private message to SuperGSPorty
Find all posts by SuperGSPorty
#2
11-27-2010, 05:55 PM
Senior Member
From Hollywood, FL
Joined in Jul 2010
2,022 posts
hooligan111988's Avatar
hooligan111988
20 AP
HA!....thats all i have to say.lol
__________________
"In an era of specialists – you’re either a clay court specialist, a grass court specialist or a hard court specialist… or you’re Roger Federer." Jimmy Connors
EAD Approved on 10/19/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hooligan111988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hooligan111988
Find all posts by hooligan111988
#3
11-27-2010, 06:33 PM
Member
Joined in Nov 2010
54 posts
PASStheDREAM
0 AP
Dont Lose Hope! Keep The Negativity Off
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
PASStheDREAM
View Public Profile
Send a private message to PASStheDREAM
Find all posts by PASStheDREAM
#4
11-27-2010, 06:37 PM
Senior Member
From Hollywood, FL
Joined in Jul 2010
2,022 posts
hooligan111988's Avatar
hooligan111988
20 AP
oh i got a lot of hope...but there's no way McCain is gonna vote yea.
__________________
"In an era of specialists – you’re either a clay court specialist, a grass court specialist or a hard court specialist… or you’re Roger Federer." Jimmy Connors
EAD Approved on 10/19/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hooligan111988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hooligan111988
Find all posts by hooligan111988
#5
11-27-2010, 06:43 PM
Member
From SoCal
Joined in Oct 2007
88 posts
GreaserFromNowhere's Avatar
GreaserFromNowhere
0 AP
Here's Malkin's list of "fence sitters"....call them!

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/19...uitment-drive/

"Here’s the current DREAM Act Senate fence-sitters scorecard and phone numbers again.
The open-borders lobby never lets up. Neither should you:


REPUBLICANS:
SEN. JOHN MCCAIN 202-224-2235; 480-897-6289: Staff says he “hasn’t made a public statement” and “hasn’t made up his mind.” He talked a tough border security game to get re-elected, while promising illegal alien activists he would “resolve their issues.” (Refresh your memories here.)
SEN. OLYMPIA SNOWE 202-224-5344; 207-874-0883: Staff says she “hasn’t released a statement.”
SEN. SUSAN COLLINS 202-224-2523; 207-945-0417: Staff says she “hasn’t released a public statement.”
SEN. LISA MURKOWSKI 202-224-6665; 907-271-3735: Staff says she’s “still reviewing the bill.”

DEMOCRATS:
SEN. JIM WEBB OF VIRGINIA 202-224-4024; 703-573-7090. Staff says “he hasn’t made a public statement.”
SEN. KENT CONRAD OF NORTH DAKOTA 202-224-2043; 701-258-4648. Staff says “he hasn’t released a statement.” Conrad has voted against the DREAM Act in the past.
SEN. BYRON DORGAN OF NORTH DAKOTA 202 224-2551. He voted against the DREAM Act in the past. Staff says he “hasn’t taken a public position.”
SEN. MARK PRYOR OF ARKANSAS 202-224-2353; 501-324-6336. He voted no on the DREAM Act cloture vote in September. Staff says he is “likely” to vote no again, though he hasn’t made an official public statement yet.
SEN. JON TESTER OF MONTANA 202 224-2644. Staff says he has voted against the DREAM Act in the past and “he will probably vote against any bill that has amnesty in it.”
SEN. MAX BAUCUS OF MONTANA 202-224-2651. He has opposed the DREAM Act in the past and is a “likely no” again in this session.
SEN. CLAIRE MCCASKILL OF MISSOURI 202-224-6154. She opposed the DREAM Act in the past and staff says she has made no statement changing her position otherwise.
__________________
I'M NOT ILLEGAL, I'M IMPORTED
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
GreaserFromNowhere
View Public Profile
Send a private message to GreaserFromNowhere
Find all posts by GreaserFromNowhere
#6
11-27-2010, 07:17 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
They should keep the hunger strike on.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#7
11-27-2010, 07:21 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,656 posts
dado123
0 AP
Most importantly we should support by calling, faxing, e-mailing, 1-866-587-6101, will automatically put you through to a republican whom indicated they would support DA, remember to press the # to skip the message and straight to voicemail, thats for today, tomorrow you would call and talk to their staff members. This week is crucial for us, lets flood congress with our calls.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#8
11-27-2010, 08:12 PM
Senior Member
From California
Joined in Jan 2009
1,438 posts
Dreamer X's Avatar
Dreamer X
0 AP
i guess malkin is good for something
__________________
"I shall seize Fate by the throat; it shall certainly not bend and crush me completely" -Ludwig von Beethoven
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dreamer X
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dreamer X
Find all posts by Dreamer X
#9
11-27-2010, 08:59 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
I think McCain is just contemplating whether to help give Obama another legislative victory by voting for Dream Act. Wouldn't be surprised if he still holds a grudge for his loss. As for the rest of those Democrats, its a shame they'll vote against us.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#10
11-27-2010, 09:06 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Btw looking at that list, something tells me we can definitely convince the GOP ladies to vote for the Dream Act. I'm definitely going to make calls and get all my friends to call them on Monday.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.