• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Sen. Schumer: 'Darn good chance' of passing immigration reform

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
11-14-2012, 12:49 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
125 posts
Jimegirl87
0 AP
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...iref=allsearch

Washington (CNN) - Sen. Charles Schumer, the third ranking Senate Democrat, said Sunday that he and Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham will officially restart immigration reform talks that crumbled two years ago.

Schumer told NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday that he and Graham have a plan designed to appeal to stakeholders on all sides of the highly contentious issue and he's optimistic that it can get through a gridlocked Congress.


"[Sen.] Graham and I are talking to our colleagues about this right now. I think we have a darn good chance using this blueprint to get something done this year," Schumer said.

The plan includes four key elements: stronger border security, creation of non-forgeable proof-of-citizenship documents, fairer legal immigration for desirable candidates, and a tough-love path to citizenship for those already in the U.S.

That path, Schumer said, would require applicants to learn English, wait their turn behind immigrants who've used proper legal channels, hold down a steady job, and refrain from criminal activity.

The long-simmering issue of immigration reform has been thrust into the spotlight again on the heels of Republicans' Election Day losses in races where the Latino vote played a key role. Mitt Romney, the GOP nominee, won only 27% of the Latino vote.

In the days since the election, Republican lawmakers, political commentators and thought leaders have taken on a more conciliatory tone when discussing immigration. Graham himself was quick to point out that Republicans missed an opportunity.

"Conservatism would sell with Hispanics. They're hard working, entrepreneurial, pro-life, pro-military," Graham said Sunday on CBS. "But the truth of the matter is the immigration debate that we engaged in in 2006 and 2007 has built a wall between the Republican Party and the Hispanic community because of the tone and rhetoric."

Graham made clear that he wasn't inclined to miss the opportunity the next time around.

"It's one thing to shoot yourself in the foot. Just don't reload the gun. So I intend not to reload this gun when it comes to Hispanics. I intend to tear down this wall and pass an immigration reform bill."

But it remains to be seen how much support can be rallied. Schumer and Graham have made several attempts to tackle immigration reform. In 2010, President Barack Obama expressed support for Schumer and Graham's efforts, saying he was "pleased" to see a promising bipartisan framework.

"We had put together a comprehensive detailed blueprint on immigration reform. It had the real potential for bi-partisan support based on the theory that most Americans are for legal immigration but very much against illegal immigration," Schumer said.

However, their efforts drew fire from all sides, with the progressive publication The American Prospect at one point calling their plan "ridiculous" and GOP party committees in Graham's home state of South Carolina censuring him for his congressional votes on immigration. Talks eventually stalled.

On Sunday, Schumer didn't offer any more specifics about the timeline for talks or implementation. He did emphasize the need for compromise from both sides and a strong role for moderate Republican voices as the talks unfold.
__________________
Application done and filed by myself | |Sent: 9/11/12 to Texas
Delivered: 9/13/12 || G1145 Notification: 9/18/12 Routed to Vermont|| I-797s: 9/21/12 || Biometrics: Received letter 9/22/2012, Appointment 10/10/2012 Done (no walk-in) || EAD: Approved 11/20/2012! || [color="RoyalBlue"] Have SSN and Driver's License from FL
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Jimegirl87
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Jimegirl87
Find all posts by Jimegirl87
#2
11-14-2012, 02:06 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
They could just pull the CIR from last one and revise it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#3
11-14-2012, 03:00 AM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
Rinse and repeat, right DA user?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#4
11-14-2012, 07:01 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
468 posts
Stephanie61593's Avatar
Stephanie61593
0 AP
I wonder what will be the requirements for the path to citizenship. I wonder if it will be like the Dream Act but tougher requirements. I can't wait until we have more specifics. Thanks for the article
__________________
Sent: 9/11/12 NJ....................................Delivered: 9/15/12 Chicago, IL
G-1145: 9/19/12....................................I-797C Receipts: 9/22/12 CA
Biometrics: 9/28/12 for 10/22/12..Approved: Feb.1,2013
Waiting: 139 Days since application was received, 102 Days since bios
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Stephanie61593
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Stephanie61593
Find all posts by Stephanie61593
#5
11-14-2012, 07:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
468 posts
Stephanie61593's Avatar
Stephanie61593
0 AP
I was just thinking and I remembered like the obvious requirements such as know English, a complete background check. I think other requirements should include things like for example be here for at least 10 yrs, pay fines for not paying taxes and breaking the law. I wonder if they will include anything else.....

Also how will this affect Daca applicants who have and will be approved. Will we have per say an advantage over others...or will we automatically receive a form of legal residency. So many questions.
__________________
Sent: 9/11/12 NJ....................................Delivered: 9/15/12 Chicago, IL
G-1145: 9/19/12....................................I-797C Receipts: 9/22/12 CA
Biometrics: 9/28/12 for 10/22/12..Approved: Feb.1,2013
Waiting: 139 Days since application was received, 102 Days since bios
Last edited by Stephanie61593; 11-14-2012 at 07:10 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Stephanie61593
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Stephanie61593
Find all posts by Stephanie61593
#6
11-14-2012, 10:20 AM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephanie61593 View Post
I was just thinking and I remembered like the obvious requirements such as know English, a complete background check. I think other requirements should include things like for example be here for at least 10 yrs, pay fines for not paying taxes and breaking the law. I wonder if they will include anything else.....

Also how will this affect Daca applicants who have and will be approved. Will we have per say an advantage over others...or will we automatically receive a form of legal residency. So many questions.
I certainly think that DA will be included as an amendment to a broader CIR bill or they might pass DA first. But DACA beneficiaries will definitely have an upper hand and will be given a conditional green card for sure. Can't say the same about the rest. Every one will be legalized but not sure how or what form of status they'll give them. I am dead sure though that we will have our green cards. It just makes sense and would make the process efficient.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#7
11-14-2012, 11:17 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
299 posts
KingGeorge's Avatar
KingGeorge
0 AP
its about time
__________________
[b]Package sent on:9.24/2012
Delivered on: 9/25/2012 @ 11:00am
Routed to:Nebraska
Biometrics: 10/09/2012
APPROVED: 11/06/2012[/B
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
KingGeorge
View Public Profile
Send a private message to KingGeorge
Find all posts by KingGeorge
#8
11-14-2012, 11:40 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
183 posts
Pootie-Tang
0 AP
I wonder what they mean by "wait their turn behind immigrants who have used legal channels"... By legal channels do they mean the millions of people who applied and are waiting for a Visa outside of the US or do they mean those that applied to get a greencard within the US? Or do they simply mean those that came here with a Visa already?

I just hope I don't have to wait 3+ years after the bill has passed to get a GC.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pootie-Tang
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pootie-Tang
Find all posts by Pootie-Tang
#9
11-14-2012, 03:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
103 posts
muslimah23's Avatar
muslimah23
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pootie-Tang View Post
I wonder what they mean by "wait their turn behind immigrants who have used legal channels"... By legal channels do they mean the millions of people who applied and are waiting for a Visa outside of the US or do they mean those that applied to get a greencard within the US? Or do they simply mean those that came here with a Visa already?

I just hope I don't have to wait 3+ years after the bill has passed to get a GC.
Same here.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
muslimah23
View Public Profile
Send a private message to muslimah23
Find all posts by muslimah23
#10
11-14-2012, 04:04 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pootie-Tang View Post
I wonder what they mean by "wait their turn behind immigrants who have used legal channels"... By legal channels do they mean the millions of people who applied and are waiting for a Visa outside of the US or do they mean those that applied to get a greencard within the US? Or do they simply mean those that came here with a Visa already?

I just hope I don't have to wait 3+ years after the bill has passed to get a GC.
In the current system the three most common ways to immigrate legally are family-based, employment based, and diversity visa (green card lottery). The backlog for family-based greencard for any relatives of USC other than spouse and underage children is anywhere between 2 to 23 years. The backlog for employment-based greencard can be as long as 10 years, unless you're very higly educated and experienced.

http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bul...etin_5779.html

The backlog is ridiculous, and as a matter of fact Bush's failed CIR actually proposed to increase the quota so all these people could immediately file for green card. Even if you have to wait behind them, you wouldn't wait for long with the new quota numbers.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.