• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

February

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

President Obama’s uncle wins new bid to try to stay in US

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
12-04-2012, 02:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://www.boston.com/news/local/mas...ysL/story.html
Quote:

President Obama’s uncle has won a new deportation hearing in Boston immigration court, more than a year after a drunk-driving arrest in Framingham revealed that he had violated a longstanding order to return to Kenya.

Last week, the Board of *Immigration Appeals granted Onyango Obama’s request to *reopen his immigration case based in part on his contention that his prior lawyer was *ineffective, according to a government official with direct knowledge of the case. Obama’s new lawyers have also argued that the 68-year-old Obama has lived in the United States for nearly half a century and *deserves a chance to make his case.

Brian P. Hale — spokesman for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which is prosecuting the deportation — confirmed that the board has reopened the case but declined to elaborate.

The board’s decision raised eyebrows among immi*gration lawyers who say it is difficult to persuade the immi*gration courts to reconsider a case that involves an arrest and a flagrant violation of a depor*tation order, last issued in 1992.

Framingham police arrested Obama for drunken driving in August 2011 and he later admit*ted in court that prosecutors had sufficient facts to bring the charge against him. But the drunk driving charge will be dismissed as long as he complies with terms of his sentence, including a year of probation that ends in March.

“With an outstanding order and a legally fuzzy plea, it’s pretty unusual for the board to reopen” an immigration case, said Crystal Williams, executive director of the Washington-based American Immigration Lawyers Association. “It’s not unheard of, but it’s pretty *unusual.”

Scott Bratton, one of Obama’s lawyers at the Margaret Wong law firm in Cleveland, said Monday night, “We are obviously extremely pleased with the board’s decision. This will allow him to pursue his application for permanent resident status.”

Lauren Alder Reid, the courts’ chief counsel for legislative and public affairs, said she could not comment on the immi*gration case or say when a hearing would be scheduled because case information is generally protected by federal privacy provisions, unless the immigrant or his representative *authorizes its release.

Because immigration court records are generally closed to the public, it is unclear what evi*dence the board reviewed to support Obama’s claim that his lawyer was ineffective. The government official who provided the reasons behind the board’s decision spoke on condition of anonymity because that person was not authorized to speak to reporters.

However, prior immigration judges’ rulings in Obama’s case obtained by the Globe under the Freedom of Information Act show that the Board of Immigration Appeals criticized his lawyer, Joseph F. O’Neil, in 1992 for failing to file a legal brief to support Obama’s *appeal.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
12-04-2012, 03:49 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2011
1,424 posts
tyler129
0 AP
convenient for him to have a nice nephew.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tyler129
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tyler129
Find all posts by tyler129
#3
12-04-2012, 09:39 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Surely having 'Obama' as your last name can't hurt...
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
#4
12-04-2012, 06:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2008
1,912 posts
MDxOD's Avatar
MDxOD
0 AP
Not surprising at all...neither was his aunts story.
__________________
DACA Timeline
||Vermont|| 9/14 -> 4/18||Approved||
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MDxOD
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MDxOD
Find all posts by MDxOD
#5
12-04-2012, 06:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2012
814 posts
DamLeon123
0 AP
They will never deport him. He has an unseen special status not afforded not anyother immigrant.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DamLeon123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DamLeon123
Find all posts by DamLeon123
#6
12-04-2012, 09:25 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
just make dream act age req 23-70
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity
#7
12-04-2012, 11:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
675 posts
Charolastra's Avatar
Charolastra
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Severity View Post
just make dream act age req 23-70
lol, if you do that AND keep the required age of entry into the U.S. at 16, then that means that a 70-year-old man or woman would've been living in the us for 54 years. I think they would be citizens by now.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Charolastra
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Charolastra
Find all posts by Charolastra
#8
12-04-2012, 11:20 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
I mean't to put 13-70
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity
#9
12-05-2012, 12:48 AM
Senior Member
From San Francisco, CA
Joined in Dec 2008
397 posts
jamesp
0 AP
Anyone who lived half a century in this country, deserves a chance to become a US citizen. Obama's uncle or not.

I wonder why he didn't get PR through the registry provision. Where was he in 1986? I am pretty sure there is more to this story. There is a possibility that he has a criminal history.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jamesp
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jamesp
Find all posts by jamesp
#10
12-05-2012, 12:56 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charolastra View Post
lol, if you do that AND keep the required age of entry into the U.S. at 16, then that means that a 70-year-old man or woman would've been living in the us for 54 years. I think they would be citizens by now.
It is also possible to undocumented if one has lived here since 1982.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.