• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Rubio’s Immigration Cowardice

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
04-04-2013, 12:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
329 posts
swordfish
0 AP
Why were we all talking about Marco Rubio yesterday? Because Marco Rubio made sure of it. His little intervention into the immigration bill was designed to achieve a couple mostly obvious objectives: to make sure Chuck Schumer isn’t the one doing all the public framing of the issue, and to say to the Beltway crowd, or try to say, that he’s the one driving this train. But it was an odd incursion too. Rubio actually deserves credit for some of the steps he’s taken on immigration so far. But what he said over the weekend sounded for all the world like somebody who really secretly wants to kill the bill. He may or may not. But the one thing he definitely does not want to kill is his presidential chances, and it seems he’s figured that the way to do that is to keep his options on immigration open. If passage will help, he’ll push for that. But if it turns out that his party hasn’t changed, doesn’t want to change, that the famous outreach program meets resistance from the in-reach caucus—well then, adios.

To review. It was a big deal over the weekend when the Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO reached an agreement on the temporary and low-skill worker program. That was leaked, probably by the liberal side. Then Schumer—and others, including Republicans—went on the Sunday shows to talk about how the deal among the Senate Gang of Eight that’s been negotiating a bill was basically done.


And that was the moment Rubio chose to release a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Pat Leahy to say let’s hold our horses. He wrote: “excessive haste in the pursuit of a lasting solution is perhaps even more dangerous to the goals many of us share … A rush to legislate, without fully considering all views and input from all senators, would be fatal to the effort of earning the public’s confidence.”


Translated from the Senate, what that means is, “I’m not for this yet.” He spoke elsewhere of full hearings and lots of amendments. Everybody who follows the Senate knows that the best way to kill a piece of legislation in the Senate is to have full hearings and lots of amendments. By the time 100 senators finish kneading the dough of a piece of legislation it’s been turned into something a starving child wouldn’t eat. Rubio knows this.



So he’s trying to do two things here at the same time, things that are completely at odds with each other. On the one hand he wants to be seen as the leader, or at least as the Republican leader, on immigration reform. He wants the spotlight in a big way. Benjy Sarlin of TPM made the keen observation yesterday that this is now the second time in this process that Rubio is “once again setting himself up to claim credit for winning concessions that no one opposed in the first place.”


On the other hand, he wants to try to protect himself from being damaged too badly if reform collapses. He still isn’t sure, no one is sure, whether the hard-shell elements in the GOP are going to rise up against reform when crunch time hits. No one really knows what the Tea Party view will be (and Rubio of course comes from those swamps). No one yet knows how this border security as a prerequisite or “trigger” for a path to citizenship is going to look, or whether this trigger will even be in the final legislation, and this could be an immense sticking point, turning Limbaugh and the base against reform. So just in case there’s an eruption, Rubio wants to be able to say he was against it from the start.


Ever seen The Great McGinty, the fantastic Preston Sturges film? Akim Tamiroff played the back-room political machine boss. Brian Donleavy was his hand-picked governor. After Donleavy’s first term and a few scandals, public sentiment turned against the machine and toward the reformers. Some aide fretted to Tamiroff that this meant big trouble, but the boss was nonchalant. “It’s not a problem,” he said, “I run the reformers too!”


Rubio is the Akim Tamiroff of immigration reform. And the important point here is not about Rubio or his political postures or his presidential ambitions. The important point, in a country where 1,000 people are deported every day, is the legislation. And Rubio’s posturing tells me the legislation is still in trouble. Last week I’d have put the chances of failure at just above 50 percent. This week I’d put them at just below 50 percent. Things have improved a little, with the AFL/Chamber deal. But there’s still a farmworkers element to be cobbled together. And politically, there’s still the issue that in the House, John Boehner would almost surely have to break the Hastert Rule again to pass a path to citizenship.


Yes, yes; Republicans are doomed if they don’t embrace this, so they have to act in a rational manner. Well … yes, they do, eventually. But eventually might not mean just yet. We learned over the weekend that Rubio is apparently thinking exactly that. And by the way we learned something about him over the weekend, too; keeping one’s options open is the opposite of leadership.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...cowardice.html
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
swordfish
View Public Profile
Send a private message to swordfish
Find all posts by swordfish
#2
04-04-2013, 12:50 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
3,742 posts
MIdreamer's Avatar
MIdreamer
0 AP
Quote:
If passage will help, he’ll push for that. But if it turns out that his party hasn’t changed, doesn’t want to change, that the famous outreach program meets resistance from the in-reach caucus—well then, adios.
This is dangerous for the Republican party if they continue to walk this path.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MIdreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MIdreamer
Find all posts by MIdreamer
#3
04-04-2013, 01:17 PM
Member
Joined in Feb 2009
61 posts
Airmarshall's Avatar
Airmarshall
0 AP
If they somehow figure out a way to screw this bill up republicans can kiss Texas goodbye by 2020. If that happens they wont win another presidential election in the next 50 years! The fastest growing electorates in texas are hispanic and those 38 electoral college votes at stake will become very expensive for republicans.
Now that a "BILL' is ready I expect we'll start seeing the true colors of these politicians. I know these guys (Dems or Reps) don't really care about us; really all they both care about is staying in power. With politics its hardly ever about principle; it's usually what do I need to do to keep my position first then everything else afterwards.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Airmarshall
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Airmarshall
Find all posts by Airmarshall
#4
04-04-2013, 01:24 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
I by no means like flattering myself but how freaking good am I? I knew from Day 1, this Marco Rubio's inclusion in the "Gang of 8" is the biggest hoax that mankind has witnessed. Actually when news was surfacing in the early days of this Senate compromise, I had absolutely no idea Rubio was a part of the "Gang of 8". Its just one day I decided to actually see which GOP Senators were a part of the group and to my surprise Rubio's name was listed in there. It seems like he still holds a grudge against Obama for derailing his imaginary Dream Act Lite version by signing DACA. Also, he now knows his country's exclusive immigration rights and status is at risk because other Hispanics are about to earn some respect through this bill. This is a major fraud to maintain importance and credibility for himself. He will NOT vote for the final bill. I promise you that. Not too sure what's wrong with the people of Florida for electing such a public cheater into office.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#5
04-04-2013, 01:31 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I by no means like flattering myself but how freaking good am I? I knew from Day 1, this Marco Rubio's inclusion in the "Gang of 8" is the biggest hoax that mankind has witnessed. Actually when news was surfacing in the early days of this Senate compromise, I had absolutely no idea Rubio was a part of the "Gang of 8". Its just one day I decided to actually see which GOP Senators were a part of the group and to my surprise Rubio's name was listed in there. It seems like he still holds a grudge against Obama for derailing his imaginary Dream Act Lite version by signing DACA. Also, he now knows his country's exclusive immigration rights and status is at risk because other Hispanics are about to earn some respect through this bill. This is a major fraud to maintain importance and credibility for himself. He will NOT vote for the final bill. I promise you that. Not too sure what's wrong with the people of Florida for electing such a public cheater into office.
From what I understand there was a scandal surrounding the Democrat and that's what helped Rubio.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
#6
04-04-2013, 01:41 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by freshh. View Post
From what I understand there was a scandal surrounding the Democrat and that's what helped Rubio.
What exactly do you refer to? Please elaborate.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#7
04-04-2013, 03:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
Its all irrelevant now, his public image is too damaged to fix. 2-3 more weeks of him running his mouth and he'll have finished digging his own grave.
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity
#8
04-04-2013, 03:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,161 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
What exactly do you refer to? Please elaborate.
Menendez?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#9
04-04-2013, 03:15 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,161 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Translated from the Senate, what that means is, 'I’m not for this yet.' " Lol, is not about you Rubio. Selfish jerk.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#10
04-04-2013, 05:52 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
What exactly do you refer to? Please elaborate.
There was a scandal about money involving Kendrick Meek's mother and an aide. Read this.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.