• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Some pols filed private immigration bills, opposed DREAM Act

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
05-05-2013, 12:20 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/s...-act-1.5199651
Quote:
WASHINGTON -- In 2000, Sen. Chuck Grassley sponsored a private bill that granted permanent residence and the ability to apply for citizenship for Lupe Landeros, a 19-year-old who was brought to the United States without a visa from Mexico when he was 2.

"It wasn't Lupe's fault that he was here illegally, and he wanted to serve what he thought was his country in the military," Grassley (R-Iowa) said then.

Ten years later, Grassley voted to block the DREAM Act, which aims to do for hundreds of thousands of young people called "dreamers" -- who also were brought here illegally as children -- what he did for Landeros.

The switch reflects the evolution of Grassley's position.

In 2004, he voted for the DREAM Act sponsored by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), and cited efforts he had made on to help young people like Landeros. Yet in 2007 and 2010 he voted to block consideration of the DREAM Act sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.).

Asked about it, Grassley called Landeros' case "unique," and said he opposed the later bills because Democrats tried to rush them through without debate and amendments.

In a 2011 hearing on the DREAM Act, Grassley said he worried it would "set the stage for another mass amnesty" and "open the door to massive fraud and abuse" because "it would allow anyone to apply."

Durbin denied those arguments, saying only children brought here five years before the law's passage are eligible; they must have "good moral character," and fraudulent applications are a crime.

Lorella Praeli, of the pro-immigrant United We Dream, called Grassley's vote to block the DREAM Act after helping Landeros "hypocrisy. This was a 'dreamer' he was talking about."

Grassley spokeswoman Beth Levine said it wasn't hypocritical, saying he filed the bill for Landeros "long before any 'DREAM Act' " or the plight of "dreamers" became an issue.

Nearly a dozen other lawmakers filed private immigration bills in the past two decades but voted against the DREAM Act or other immigration measures. They include both Mississippi senators, Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.).

Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) filed private bills in 2004, 2005 and 2007 for legal status for Griselda Lopez Negrete, brought here as toddler illegally by her mother -- and voted no on the DREAM Act in 2010.

Private bills help an individual or family get around the law because their case is exceptional in nature, said Crystal Williams, of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

Since the last major immigration overhaul in 1986, Congress has approved 94 private bills, the Congressional Research Service said. Just eight of them passed after the 9/11 attacks.

Grassley hasn't sponsored a private bill since 2000, records show. He will play a key role as the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee this week as it takes up the bipartisan immigration bill.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
05-05-2013, 08:29 AM
Junior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
9 posts
Books
0 AP
I am happy for the few dreamers who benefited from these private bills but the reason I'm guessing that Senators went with the private route and not the whole Dream Act was probably due to the states from which they come. SC, TN, GA (my state) etc have individuals living in some backward delusional fantasy land where to them, immigrants are here to take over and destroy America and because these politicians don't want to be seen as helping immigrants they'd rather say no and be hypocritical than to say yes and lose an election.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Books
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Books
Find all posts by Books
#3
05-06-2013, 06:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
207 posts
Smarty
0 AP
Grassley is just worried about getting a primary challenge from Steve batshit king. I hope he votes forCIR and puts his country first and not be intimated by the crazies! He's actually one of the smartest guys in the Senate.
__________________
Approved: 11/4/2012
Last edited by Smarty; 05-06-2013 at 06:15 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smarty
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smarty
Find all posts by Smarty


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.