• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Tech industry targets GOP senators to pass immigration reform

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
05-27-2013, 10:43 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-va...gration-reform
Quote:
The tech industry is targeting six GOP senators in the hopes of building a supermajority behind the Senate’s immigration bill.

The bill approved this week by the Judiciary Committee significantly increases the cap on H1-B visas commonly used by tech firms, and softened tougher restrictions on their use.

To preserve that victory, tech companies are trying to help the bill’s supporters secure enough GOP votes to pass the bill out of the full Senate with as close to 70 votes as possible. Such a majority would increase the bill’s odds in the House.

Tech lobbyists are wooing Sens. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Jerry Moran (R-Kans.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) to support the bill.

All have a tech presence in their state or appear open-minded on supporting an overhaul of the country's immigration rules.

Other names that have been floated include Sens. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and Dean Heller (R-Nev.).

Here’s a look at some of the main tech targets:

Sen. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.)

Major companies like Microsoft, Intel and Oracle have offices in New Hampshire, which makes the freshman Ayotte senator a natural choice for tech to reach out to.

“A fair number of H-1Bs that are in the green card queue work in these places because they’re mostly research and development centers,” a tech lobbyist said. “This is a perfect example about why the bill is important. It would ensure these people get permanent residency.”

Ayotte is also close with key Republican Gang of Eight members Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who she has partnered with on various defense issues on the Armed Services Committee.

Her office has already reached out to companies to understand the tech industry's perspective on the bill, according to an industry source.


Sen. Jerry Moran (Kansas)

Moran is viewed as potential swing vote because of his past work on high-skilled immigration legislation.

He has introduced bills that would create a visa category for tech entrepreneurs and allow foreign graduates with degrees in advanced technical fields from American universities to stay in the U.S.

The Kansas Republican's previous legislation is similar to some of the measures in the Senate immigration bill that cover highly skilled workers, according to tech lobbyists.


Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.)

Tech is also courting Paul, who is headed out West to Silicon Valley next week and is expected to meet with tech representatives, among others. During his visit, tech representatives will likely underscore why getting an immigration bill across the finish line is so important to the industry.

Paul, known for his staunch libertarian views, has been a key ally for the tech industry on past policy battles. He notably came out against the Protect IP Act, the Senate's version of the Stop Online Piracy Act, early in the debate against the anti-piracy bills.

He also came to Apple's defense during a Senate hearing this past week that examined the company's methods for avoiding taxes, where he said the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations should "apologize to Apple" for holding the hearing.

Tech insiders also consider Paul as a potential ‘yes’ vote because he has endorsed a pathway to citizenship for the 11 million immigrants living illegally in the country—one of the thorniest areas of the immigration debate that has divided Republicans.

Supporting a comprehensive immigration reform bill could also be in the best political interest for the rumored 2016 presidential contender. After an overwhelming majority of Latinos voted for President Obama in the 2012 election, Republicans are working hard to attract more Latino voters and broaden its base of supporters.

Voting in favor of the immigration bill’s passage could help Paul win over a wider group of voters.


Sen. Rob Portman (Ohio)

Portman, a rumored candidate for vice president in previous years, has also been mindful of the GOP’s need to “get themselves in a better place with a broader range of voters,” an industry source said.


Sen. Susan Collins (Maine)

Collins' state is home to Fairchild Semiconductor's facility in South Portland, which employs 800 workers.

The South Portland site used to be headquarters for the company before it was shifted to Silicon Valley in 2011.

Tech insiders also note that Maine isn't far from the hub of universities in Boston, where top universities like Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology train top foreign students in math, science and engineering that could launch startups in the Northeast.


Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)

Alaska is better known for its fishing and timber industries rather than its ties to the tech industry. However, some industry sources note that the provisions in the Senate bill covering low-skilled workers may attract Murkowski's support.

In addition to courting Republican support for the bill, the tech industry will have to fend off attempts by labor groups to remove language added to the bill after a deal between Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) that won Hatch’s support in committee for the Senate measure.

The deal eased the requirements that employers would have to follow when hiring highly skilled foreign workers on an H-1B visa, so they are more palatable to the tech industry.

Tech companies had complained that the requirements included in the original version of the Gang of Eight bill were burdensome and would prevent them from procuring the visas they needed to hire top foreign talent.

Labor groups, however, claimed Hatch’s amendments would chip away at protections for American workers that were built into the bill and required companies to offer jobs to them first before looking overseas. AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka issued scathing statement this week that called Hatch’s amendments “unambiguous attacks on American workers” and vowed to fight them on the floor.

“As president Trumka stated, we're going to continue to try to make the very constructive and very positive [immigration] bill even better and that includes trying to reinstate the worker protections that were weakened by the Hatch amendments,” said AFL-CIO spokesman Jeff Hauser. “We'll probably do that on the Senate floor and try to work with allies to get that done.”

Tech lobbyists are already on guard against these efforts as the bill is headed to the floor.

“We’ll have our antenna up on attempts by organized labor to peel back on the H-1B amendments,” a tech lobbyist said.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
05-27-2013, 10:57 AM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Both Susan Collins and Olympia Snow voted against Dream Act in 2010. How disgraceful of Women senators especially. I doubt Collins will vote for CIR.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#3
05-27-2013, 11:38 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
260 posts
dreamerperson
0 AP
I hope the tech elites are able to sway these people successfully, especially if and when the Senate bill reaches the House floor.

I feel like I'm in an alternate universe sometimes because I'm finding myself on the same side of an issue as Ruport Murdoch and Grover Norquist..

Quote:
Tech insiders also consider Paul as a potential ‘yes’ vote because he has endorsed a pathway to citizenship for the 11 million immigrants living illegally in the country—one of the thorniest areas of the immigration debate that has divided Republicans.
This seems contradictory to a previous post on here that quotes Paul as saying he doesn't want to pass a bill with a pathway to citizenship. Which is it?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamerperson
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamerperson
Find all posts by dreamerperson
#4
05-27-2013, 01:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
520 posts
bigdreamer2010
0 AP
^ well they already bought senator hatch
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bigdreamer2010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bigdreamer2010
Find all posts by bigdreamer2010
#5
05-27-2013, 03:16 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,110 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
I worked in Telecomm/IT for about 9 years. The competition is very intense and once an H1b holder can leave its original sponsoring employer, previous colleagues will often follow them to their next venture. They are doing this because if the House decides to break up the Senate bill into pieces, and their tech legislation passes, they are set. They should make this absolutely conditional upon CIR passing.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#6
05-27-2013, 04:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2013
294 posts
EditorInChief
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
I worked in Telecomm/IT for about 9 years. The competition is very intense and once an H1b holder can leave its original sponsoring employer, previous colleagues will often follow them to their next venture. They are doing this because if the House decides to break up the Senate bill into pieces, and their tech legislation passes, they are set. They should make this absolutely conditional upon CIR passing.
In fact, I do not think these H1B people really care about the US green card any more. I have seen quite a few people have abandoned their US green cards.

They clearly have more resources. And they easily move to places where permanent residency is easy to get. Canada has created programs that are designed for US H1B visa holders. I remember Canada has recently sent people to the Silicon Valley to advertise the Canadian green card programs.

The US green card is being trashed everywhere around the world.
Last edited by EditorInChief; 05-27-2013 at 04:57 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EditorInChief
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EditorInChief
Find all posts by EditorInChief
#7
05-28-2013, 12:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2013
127 posts
satnam
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by EditorInChief View Post
In fact, I do not think these H1B people really care about the US green card any more. I have seen quite a few people have abandoned their US green cards.

They clearly have more resources. And they easily move to places where permanent residency is easy to get. Canada has created programs that are designed for US H1B visa holders. I remember Canada has recently sent people to the Silicon Valley to advertise the Canadian green card programs.

The US green card is being trashed everywhere around the world.
Also if you are a citizen of any European Union member country you can practically move to any other EU nation and start working instantly without the need to apply for a visa/work permit.

If you have experience/degree in a high paying tech field you have many more options all over. But of course, simply being born in the right place is a huge advantage.
__________________
Application Sent: 10/19/2012 | Delivered: 10/21/2012 | Acceptance Confirmation: 10/28/2012 (vermont) | Biometrics Walk In: 11/13/2012 | Transfered: 03/06/2013 (Nebraska) | Transferred Part 2: 03/22/2012 | Approval: 4/23/2013
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
satnam
View Public Profile
Send a private message to satnam
Find all posts by satnam


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.