• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

U.S. justices' 2007 climate change ruling looms over immigration case Read more at Re

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
11-12-2015, 04:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,160 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
This is why I'm worried about the litigation.

Quote:
U.S. justices' 2007 climate change ruling looms over immigration case

The conservative legal challenge to President Barack Obama's executive action on immigration, in line for U.S. Supreme Court review, would force the justices to wrestle with their own conflicting votes on when states have a legal right to sue the federal government.

It is a question the court would have to answer before it could rule on whether Obama exceeded his presidential powers, as 26 Republican-governed states led by Texas contend, by bypassing a gridlocked Congress and taking unilateral executive action aimed at shielding millions of illegal immigrants from deportation.

The justices could decide as early as January on whether to hear the dispute during their current term, which runs through June. If they do, they would have to decide how much weight to give the court's 2007 decision in a major environmental case.

The court was split on ideological lines in ruling 5-4 that Democratic-leaning states led by Massachusetts could sue Republican former President George W. Bush's administration in a bid to spur U.S. action on climate change. The ruling eventually led to the Obama administration issuing the first-ever U.S. greenhouse gas emissions regulations.

In that case, the liberal justices voted in favor of the states and conservatives dissented. This time, it will be conservatives asking the court to rule that states can sue and liberals arguing the opposite.

The Obama administration said on Tuesday it would seek Supreme Court review after an appeals court ruled in favor of the states challenging the November 2014 order, affirming a lower court's order blocking Obama's action.

In Monday’s decision backing the states, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals spent seven pages analyzing the environmental case and cited it throughout the ruling.

Seven of the current nine justices participated in the 2007 case, including frequent swing vote Anthony Kennedy, who backed the states.



Read more at Reutershttp://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/12/us-usa-court-immigration-idUSKCN0T02OB20151112#pU0cswx3fzvK5mZo.99

  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#2
11-12-2015, 06:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Greattttt
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.