Momentum builds for bill to help 'Dreamers'

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are scrambling to find a legislative fix for the embattled Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, as it faces a crucial legal challenge.

DACA grants a work permit and protection from deportation to about 750,000 undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children.

Ten states, led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R), have threatened to challenge DACA in the courts unless the Trump administration cancels the program by September 5.

The Trump administration has not said if it will defend the program in court.
Concerns that the program could be terminated by the administration or court ruling has led to a flurry of legislative proposals over the last two weeks designed to protect immigrants under the program, commonly known as Dreamers, through legal status or a path to citizenship if the program ends.

House Democrats presented the American Hope Act Friday, garnering 117 co-sponsors within the Democratic Caucus, so far.

And in a bipartisan move, earlier this week, Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) and Lucille Roybal Allard (D-Calif.) presented a new version of the Dream Act, a bill that was first presented in 2001.

It's similar to a bill presented in the upper chamber by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.).

A bill presented by Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.) in the House in March, the Recognizing America's Children (RAC) Act, is gaining support among centrist Republicans.

"There's an added urgency to deal with the Dreamers. As you know there's all these lawsuits out there now," said Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (R-Fla.), a co-sponsor of the RAC Act.

In order to apply for DACA, potential beneficiaries were forced to register with the government, admit to being in the country illegally, and pass a background check.

That process has supporters of the program worried that the administration could turn that information into a deportation list if the program is ended administratively or by the courts.

"The administration has said they don't want to deport them, but the reality is if those lawsuits happen and succeed, then these are folks that have registered, so they're in a really precarious situation," said Díaz-Balart.

Trump renewed the program in a June memo but cancelled two other Obama-era executive orders on immigration, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) and an expansion of DACA.

Both of those programs were previously halted by their courts, so Trump's decision didn't directly affect any immigrants.

But immigrant-rights activists are making it a priority to protect DACA, and are pushing administration officials to weigh in on a legislative fix to protect Dreamers.

The appeals targeted John Kelly as Homeland Security secretary. Kelly on several occasions expressed his support for Dreamers while also questioning the legality of the program. But Kelly never supported any specific bill and was named Trump's White House chief of staff Friday, replacing Reince Priebus.

Before the Senate bill was unveiled, a White House spokesman said the administration had not supported earlier bills and was unlikely to do so.

"The fact that the president indicated he wouldn't sign it means to the secretary that it's not a viable option," said David Lapan, Kelly's spokesman, Tuesday. "[Kelly's] not going to support any legislation that’s not going to become law."

Still, Ros-Lehtinen and Roybal Allard unveiled their bill in hopes of sparking debate in the House.

Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez (Ill.), a vocal advocate on immigration, has proposed his own bill, the Hope Act.

"Defense [of Dreamers] includes putting legislation that charts a way forward," said Gutiérrez at a press conference Friday.

Gutiérrez added he would support any of the bills put forward if they kept in place protections for DACA recipients and other young immigrants in similar situations.

Between 750,000 and 800,000 people have received DACA benefits and a Migration Policy Institute study found over one million people would benefit from the House version of the Dream Act.

Supporters of the bills insist they would pass if they received a floor vote.

"This doesn't have to be complicated," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.). "The speaker makes the decision on what gets voted on, on the floor."

"I am confident that if the speaker makes a decision to put this bill on the floor we have time to debate it and pass it," she added.

A spokeswoman for Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said any bills would have to make it through committee first.

Curbelo said it's his priority to convince the Republican Conference to bring a bill protecting Dreamers to the House floor.

"It's one of my goals for this Congress," Curbelo told The Hill earlier this month.

But it's unclear if lawmakers will be able to coalesce around any one bill.

Díaz-Balart said having multiple bills is a good first step.

"It's good to have markers out there. I think I have an idea as to how maybe we can get something done -- it is going to require that the stars line up," said Díaz-Balart.

"I think there may be opportunities, hopefully this year, to actually see some legislation take place," said Díaz-Balart.

http://thehill.com/latino/344421-mom...-help-dreamers

^ this.

I agreed, with so much options now. It's inexcusable for them to say nothing can be done.

Uh, it cannot wait much longer. The lawsuit will be amended to include Daca in five weeks and I just don't see how the program can continue if Dapa, which worked the exactly same way was stopped. They can schedule a floor vote to as soon as possible before another issue/emergency/crisis happens.

The American hope act literally got sooo much support in the house

I disagree. I think the only way these bills will pass is if DACA is discontinued and we begin to suffer the consequences. Republicans will want to avoid such bad PR! Even senate republicans that were votinf for the healthcare law that would take health insurance from so many only did so in the hopes that the law would be amended in the house. Remember what happened in California the last time republicans messed with our commmunity. California turned dark blue.

Taking health care away from people is also bad PR and yet they keep trying and trying. I just don't know if I can trust the GOP to do the right thing for us.

On the topic of Republicans being mindful of PR regarding extreme-right immigration views, let's remember how Trump was able to win: by pushing extreme-right immigration views.

sooo a few of us get deported and what not at the exchange of the majority getitng some relief?

I mean do you guys realize what you proposing here?

"end DACA and MAKE Us suffer, watching us suffer will be a bad PR for them!!"

Shut up no ones getting deported