• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

January

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Denham makes aggressive move to put immigration reforms on House floor

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
03-15-2018, 03:46 PM
Member
Joined in Jan 2018
65 posts
vander
0 AP
U.S. Rep. Jeff Denham (R-CA) on March 13 introduced a resolution to invoke a rule that would quickly bring four immigration reform bills to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives without pre-approvals from House leaders.

“President Trump set a deadline for Congress to act, and we have failed to put in place a permanent solution for DACA recipients, many of whom are just one court ruling away from being deported from the only country they have ever known,” said Rep. Denham, referring to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration policy.

“We have several viable solutions stuck in committee, unable to advance for debate and amendment. The gridlock simply cannot continue. We are running out of time to deliver on our promise to Dreamers,” the congressman said.

Rep. Denham’s House Resolution (H.Res.) 774 would bring to the floor for consideration the Securing America’s Future Act of 2018, H.R. 4760; the Dream Act of 2017, H.R. 3440; the Uniting and Securing America (USA) Act of 2018, H.R. 4796; and a fourth immigration bill to be chosen by House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI).

If enacted, H.Res. 774 would allow bill sponsors to amend language prior to debate and to eventually vote, according to information provided by Denham’s office. In such a vote series, the bill that would receive the highest number of votes over 218 would pass the House under a rule known as “queen-of-the-hill,” which Denham’s staff said is rarely invoked, but was successful utilized in 2015 when multiple budget proposals were considered.

“While there are certainly differing opinions on how to proceed on these issues, a number of serious proposals have been introduced, and members of Congress should have the opportunity to debate these proposals,” Rep. Denham said.

H.Res. 774 has 37 cosponsors. U.S. Reps. Fred Upton (R-MI), Mark Amodei (R-NV), Susan Brooks (R-IN), Dan Donovan (R-NY), Don Bacon (R-NE), Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), Bill Shuster (R-PA), and John Katko (R-NY) signed on as original cosponsors. Also joining as cosponsors were U.S. Reps. Rodney Davis (R-IL), Charlie Dent (R-PA), Glenn ‘GT’ Thompson (R-PA), Darrell Issa (R-CA), Ryan Costello (R-PA), Bruce Poliquin (R-ME), Tom Reed (R-NY), Tom Rooney (R-FL), and Erik Paulsen (R-MN).

Introduced by U.S. Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) in January, H.R. 4760, would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to revise immigrant visa provisions, eliminate the diversity visa program, adjust annual immigration levels and increase the limit on the number of employment-based immigrants. The bill has been referred to the U.S. House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.

Introduced by U.S. Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA) in July 2017, H.R. 3440 would grant lawful permanent resident status to those who have been in the country for four years prior to the bill’s enactment, were younger than 18 when they entered the country, meet educational requirements, and haven’t been convicted of federal or state offenses. Additionally, the bill would grant permanent residence on a conditional basis for DACA recipients, unless they’ve engaged in disqualifying conduct. The bill has been referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.

Introduced by U.S. Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX) in January, H.R. 4796 would grant conditional permanent resident status to DACA recipients and others who have been in the country since at least Dec. 31, 2013, were younger than 18 when they entered, and meet additional criteria. The bill has been referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.

H.Res 774 has been referred to the House Rules Committee.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
vander
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vander
Find all posts by vander
#2
03-15-2018, 03:46 PM
Member
Joined in Jan 2018
65 posts
vander
0 AP
https://riponadvance.com/stories/den...s-house-floor/
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
vander
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vander
Find all posts by vander
#3
03-15-2018, 04:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2017
2,017 posts
Red neck's Avatar
Red neck
0 AP
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-...4%22%5D%7D&r=2
__________________
https://twitter.com/Theytukerrrjobs
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Red neck
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Red neck
Find all posts by Red neck
#4
03-15-2018, 05:00 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2017
1,158 posts
BeansDreamtoo21
0 AP
Isnt this very important?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
BeansDreamtoo21
View Public Profile
Send a private message to BeansDreamtoo21
Find all posts by BeansDreamtoo21
#5
03-15-2018, 05:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
There is a Pelosi video going around. I guess now she is not in favor of giving wall funding in exchange for dreamers. Has anyone seen it?
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#6
03-15-2018, 05:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,720 posts
isk84life
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
There is a Pelosi video going around. I guess now she is not in favor of giving wall funding in exchange for dreamers. Has anyone seen it?
Was on an article too. "We wont give up the wall for nothing"

She is playing with fire, dems want a younger and less polarizing speaker if the win the house.
__________________
Human-Computer Interaction Engineering MS
Senior User Experience Designer @ Facebook
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
isk84life
View Public Profile
Send a private message to isk84life
Find all posts by isk84life
#7
03-15-2018, 05:52 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by isk84life View Post
Was on an article too. "We wont give up the wall for nothing"

She is playing with fire, dems want a younger and less polarizing speaker if the win the house.
Ok. Never mind; I misunderstood.

It's all on Trump for a narrow deal--I guess. We all know we are not worth a government shutdown.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#8
03-15-2018, 05:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
5,606 posts
JJ Glo's Avatar
JJ Glo
60 AP
Dems wouldn't trade the wall for a clean Dream Act right now. Why would they? The Democratic wave is in full force. The last thing they want to do right now is give Trump a win.
__________________
Self filed AOS │Apps Received By USCIS - 3/18/19 │Biometrics Done - 4/11/19
Interview Scheduled - 4/24/19│Interview Date - 5/31/19│AOS Approval - 5/31/19
Permanent Resident Card Received - 6/8/19
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JJ Glo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JJ Glo
Find all posts by JJ Glo
#9
03-15-2018, 05:56 PM
Member
Joined in Jan 2018
65 posts
vander
0 AP
The president doesn't have much option or even time for his wall.. and about Mrs Pelosi as speaker didn't she said "immigration is not a priority" as speaker in 2008?? Please if somebody knows about it. Please share with me. Thanks. Peace.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
vander
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vander
Find all posts by vander
#10
03-15-2018, 05:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Glo View Post
Dems wouldn't trade the wall for a clean Dream Act right now. Why would they? The Democratic wave is in full force. The last thing they want to do right now is give Trump a win.
Then she will only prove what many of us are accusing Dems of: playing politics. Are they to tell us to wait until they legalize us without any border security concessions? When will that happen? It's a shitty move to tell us to wait for the midterm (which really won't change anything) or the presidential election (Trump is not guaranteed to lose).
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.