• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Supreme Court rules against immigrants in temporary status seeking green cards

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#1
06-07-2021, 12:30 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2010
100 posts
bama_kay
0 AP
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/07/polit...ase/index.html

Quote:
Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court held on Monday that the government can block non-citizens who are in the US under a program that temporarily protects them from deportation in certain situations from applying for a green card if they entered the country unlawfully.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote for a unanimous court.
"Today's decision is not just a setback for those immigrants currently in Temporary Protected Status who did not enter the United States lawfully; it also reinforces the barriers that Dreamers would face until and unless Congress provides a statutory path to some kind of permanent lawful status," said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law.

"The Executive Branch may have some authority to confer forms of temporary legal status on those who crossed the border without permission, but the Supreme Court today reinforced, however indirectly, that only Congress can provide a permanent answer," he added.
The case concerns Jose Sanchez and Sonia Gonzales, a New Jersey couple who came to the US illegally in 1997 and 1998 and now have four children. Their youngest was born in the US and is a citizen.
Following a series of earthquakes in El Salvador in 2001, they applied for and received Temporary Protected Status, which shields foreign nationals present in the US from removal if they have been subject to armed conflicts or environmental disasters in their homeland. In 2014, the couple sought to apply to "adjust" their status to become lawful permanent residents and apply for a green card.

The US Citizenship and Immigration Services denied their application, noting that they were ineligible to apply because they had not entered the country legally and never been formally admitted to the US.
The case confronted two sections of immigration law: one that says that those in TPS should be considered as "maintaining lawful status," and another that says in order to adjust status, an individual in TPS must have been admitted lawfully.
Kagan said that the conferral of TPS status does not make an unlawful entrant like Sanchez eligible for a green card.

Kagan said that there was "no dispute" that Sanchez entered the US "unlawfully, without inspection." She said that a "straightforward" application of immigration law supports the government's decision to deny him status as a lawful permanent resident because he was not lawfully admitted.
"He therefore cannot become a permanent resident of this country," Kagan concluded.
Currently, there are about 400,000 people with TPS status in the country and 85,000 have managed to adjust status.

Although a district court ruled in favor of the couple, an appeals court reversed. It held that TPS does not "constitute an admission."
In court, Amy M. Saharia, a lawyer for Jose and Sonia Gonzales, argued that having been admitted is "inherent" in the TPS status. But Michael R. Huston, assistant to the US solicitor general, drew a line between status and admission, arguing against the couple.
The government said that while Congress had made some individuals eligible to adjust their status if they met certain criteria and had a sponsor, it was not available to those who had not made a lawful entry. Huston said the government had "reasonably determined" that Congress did not "establish TPS as a special pathway to permanent residents for non-citizens who are already barred from that privilege because of pre-TPS conduct."

He urged the court to defer to the position taken by the agency in the case and he noted that there are "tens of thousands" of TPS holders who have adjusted their status, but they had been lawfully admitted as a student or an au pair or a temporary worker. He said that TPS holders know that it is a temporary form of relief from removal and that it "will not last forever." At an early point in the case, the Trump administration had argued that those in the TPS program could never try to get green cards. The Biden administration's position leaves open the opportunity for the government to change its mind.
__________________
Date Application Sent: 8/20/12 | Lockbox sent to: Lewisville, TX | Date delivered: 8/21/12
Date G1145: 8/23/12 | Date of I-797 C: 8/28/12 | Date Biometrics: 9/11/12, received 9/1/12 | RFE: 12/24/12 | RFE Response Received: 12/27/12 | Approved: 1/3/12 | Date of EAD received:
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bama_kay
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bama_kay
Find all posts by bama_kay
#2
06-07-2021, 01:07 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2017
241 posts
lachupacabra
0 AP
so, just do AP?
__________________
DACA from 2012-2026
- I-130: Sent 9/2020 => Approved 2/2022
- AP: sent 10/2022 => paroled 6/2023
-AOS with 212 Waiver: Sent 7/2023, 5-year EAD expiring in 2029
- Absentia removal order rescinded: Nov 2023, Dismissed: October 2024
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
lachupacabra
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lachupacabra
Find all posts by lachupacabra
#3
06-07-2021, 01:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2015
1,587 posts
beingoflight's Avatar
beingoflight
0 AP
Wouldn't AP clear the EWI for us??

Besides that, LMFAOOOOOOOOO good job NPCs, this is what uncle Joe is getting u, but hey, orange man bad?
__________________
We Never Asked For This.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
beingoflight
View Public Profile
Send a private message to beingoflight
Find all posts by beingoflight
#4
06-07-2021, 01:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2015
4,862 posts
Got_Daca's Avatar
Got_Daca online
0 AP
Nothing new here really
__________________
MAGA DACA ACA FAM
Approved: 11/27/2023
U-Visa eligible (not applied yet)
"Dreamers can't take the center stage"
- Democratic Leadership
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Got_Daca
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Got_Daca
Find all posts by Got_Daca
#5
06-07-2021, 02:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
1,500 posts
Outsider626's Avatar
Outsider626
0 AP
DACA next.

  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Outsider626
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Outsider626
Find all posts by Outsider626
#6
06-07-2021, 02:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
232 posts
thedelight21
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by beingoflight View Post
Wouldn't AP clear the EWI for us??

Besides that, LMFAOOOOOOOOO good job NPCs, this is what uncle Joe is getting u, but hey, orange man bad?
I thought before Trump left office that AP didn’t clear EWI anymore, or did that change under Biden?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
thedelight21
View Public Profile
Send a private message to thedelight21
Find all posts by thedelight21
#7
06-07-2021, 04:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2017
684 posts
trac3rt's Avatar
trac3rt
0 AP
I thought that had always been the case, that you had to be "inspected" into the US to be able to AOS.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
trac3rt
View Public Profile
Send a private message to trac3rt
Find all posts by trac3rt
#8
06-07-2021, 06:04 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,456 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by beingoflight View Post
Wouldn't AP clear the EWI for us??

Besides that, LMFAOOOOOOOOO good job NPCs, this is what uncle Joe is getting u, but hey, orange man bad?
This was a Supreme Court ruling, so Biden had nothing to do with it. Trump making the court more conservative did not help matters.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#9
06-07-2021, 06:56 PM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,456 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedelight21 View Post
I thought before Trump left office that AP didn’t clear EWI anymore, or did that change under Biden?
According to the article, a couple was trying to AOS and argued that they should be considered 'inspected' with TPS. Supreme Court ruled against them.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#10
06-07-2021, 06:57 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal, USA
Joined in Sep 2016
2,729 posts
vft1008's Avatar
vft1008
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swim19 View Post
This was a Supreme Court ruling, so Biden had nothing to do with it. Trump making the court more conservative did not help matters.
Anything to bring up Trump first and then make him out to be the hero for Dreamers.

BoL spotted in FL:

__________________
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right."
-Albus Dumbledore
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
vft1008
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vft1008
Find all posts by vft1008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.