• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Immigration Reform Effort Re-Emerges With New Senate Bill

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
03-10-2010, 09:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2009
110 posts
thebeast
0 AP
hree years after efforts by Congress to reform the immigration system went down in flames, the issue is slowly re-emerging on the national stage, as two senators from the opposite sides of the political aisle work on crafting another bill.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., chairman of the Immigration Subcommittee of the Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. are set to appear Thursday at the White House for a meeting with President Obama in which they are expected to seek his guidance on charting a path forward.

The reform effort blew up in 2007 after more than a year of work when Republican critics branded the effort as "amnesty" and the tide of public opinion turned strongly against the bill.

Graham, in fact, was booed at a Republican gathering in his state in 2006 for his work on comprehensive reform with Ted Kennedy and John McCain. Sen. McCain is conspicuously absent from the current talks; Graham remains at the table as the lone Republican supporter.

Schumer said comprehensive immigration reform is closer to reality than it appears.


"We only have a couple more things to get done," he said Wednesday. "They're hard. One is to get another Republican on the bill; one is to finally deal with the issue -- to get business and labor on the same side on future flow on low-wage workers."

A senior Senate Democratic leadership aide close to the debate said of the White House meeting, "They're giving the president an update on where they stand, but they're also reaching out to get support on securing that second Republican and for help in dealing with business and labor."

Organized labor, in 2006 and 2007, fought any robust guest worker program, also called "future flow," as Kennedy's bill sought to create with the support of President George W. Bush.

Though a GOP aide with knowledge of the process told Fox News the effort is far from complete, Schumer maintained, "We're getting real close. I'm optimistic."

Immigrant rights groups have pushed to get a bill, even without another Republican joining, but Schumer said Wednesday, that's not going to happen. "Senator Graham has been very good and generous and courageous in helping us move that bill forward. ... He has always said he wants a second Republican."

Anxious to avoid the explosive failure of the last effort, Schumer said emphatically, "We will not pass an immigration bill unless it's bipartisan. Everyone agrees with that."

Schumer said it has been a tough slog to get a second Republican, particularly since pro-reform GOP Sen. Mel Martinez of Florida, himself a Cuban immigrant, recently retired. "It's been difficult finding a second Republican," he said. "We have four or five prospects we're working on now. But if we can't, we'll have to cross that bridge when we come to it. But we're not giving up."

One Republican senator who is thought to be in play is the newest member of the body, moderate Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts. While Brown didn't slam the door on a compromise, he did not sound anxious to deal with this issue now with the unemployment rate hovering near 10 percent.

Brown told Fox News he has not yet been contacted by either Schumer or Graham, but he is willing to take a look at their bill, even though he suggested now is the time for Congress to focus on jobs, not immigration.

"We're doing health care, maybe immigration. The thing I haven't heard enough about is jobs, job creation. It's nonexistent. I think that's a mistake." Brown said, "Right now, people need jobs, period."

When asked what must be in any immigration reform bill, Brown said, "You need a strong border enforcement. You need a strong E-verification. I...have always felt that part of the problem is that we haven't provided the proper resources for people to be processed quickly enough. And when you have people waiting in line six, seven, eight, nine years in some instances, it's a disincentive to (immigrate) legally...In terms of allowing people to step ahead of the people who are trying to do it legally, I have a real problem with that."

In fact, that very issue is what tripped up the earlier effort, what's commonly referred to as "the path to legalization." The Kennedy-McCain bill laid out a series of hurdles for potential citizens to clear, a six-year process in which workers who were in the country illegally could apply for a six-year "conditional non-immigrant visa." At the end of that period, a visa holder could apply for legal permanent residence if the person paid a $1,000 fine, passed a background check, and demonstrated an effort to learn English and civics.

Critics called this "amnesty," and at the time, the House, then run by Republicans, passed a narrow, border security-only measure, and left Senate Republicans who might have supported Kennedy-McCain holding the bag. In the end, that handful of Republicans bolted and the bill went down in flames.

It is not likely the crowded Senate calendar can withstand another controversial debate this year, but Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., continues to list it among his top priorities to tackle this year. Though Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the No. 2 Democrat in the chamber, did not sound quite so sure, "Depends on support we get from the other side...I support comprehensive reform, but I'm going to leave that to Chuck."

it comes from foxnews ! lol



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...es-new-senate/
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
thebeast
View Public Profile
Send a private message to thebeast
Find all posts by thebeast
#2
03-10-2010, 10:45 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
That is unbelievable if its from Fox News. This is the quote of the century.
Quote:
Schumer said comprehensive immigration reform is closer to reality than it appears.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#3
03-10-2010, 11:03 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
The more interesting part is that the immigration meeting is tomorrow that was put off.I don't expect much from the meeting but it should be interesting what they have come up with so far.





V edit:@dtrt09 if there was such thing as rep still I'd give it,but thumps up for a well said response,lol.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
Last edited by Ianus; 03-11-2010 at 12:34 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#4
03-10-2010, 11:28 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,160 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
OMG. My head is just about to explode from anger.

TWO MAJOR POINTS:

1) This president and this administration are a 21st century political machine with 21st century technology. Therefore, this so-called meeting is only spin and damage control because if you all have been reading and not only seeing what you want to see, its purpose is to 'get an update' on an immigration bill. Really? You expect us to believe you cannot get someone in this White House to get that information electronically, via fax or thru a PHONE CALL?? Please. Sigh. Activists should meet with Obama AFTER he meets with Schumer and Graham; not before. They are seeing him before so that he then has the advantage of forewarning such senators of what to say afterwards.

2) They refuse to present such immigration bill because they can't find the support of a second Republican senator. Really? You have the audacity to claim in the press that you thought of Mel Martinez, but he's now retired. Since you work in the Senate and Mel was a Senator, unless he borrowed Harry Potter's invisibility cloak; I believe he was just accross the aisle from you on January, February, March, April, June, July, August, September, October, November and December 2009.

This press releases insult my intelligence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#5
03-11-2010, 02:01 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,160 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
@Ianus: Thank you, but isn't it obvious? The Democrats have no idea how angry people are in the immigrant community because they refuse to accept that most undocumented are part of blended families and households with citizens and legal residents in them. My family (both citizens and residents) aren't voting for Dems in the national election, only at the local level this November. They will register Independent and will become swing voters. Hispanics MUST become swing voters and vote their interests, instead of following particular political parties like sheep. It is the only way to keep politicians in check. Dems can wait until the next election to see if there's 'room' for them in Congress. We have waited forever for action on their part, and CIR should only take a day to be voted either in favor or against. We have been lied to repeatedly and made promises under false pretenses so politicians, including this President can use our citizen and legal resident family and community members' votes to gain power.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#6
03-11-2010, 02:16 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Great news. The bill would actually create millions of jobs and taxpayers and it would help the economy.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#7
03-11-2010, 08:00 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
We have been lied to repeatedly and made promises under false pretenses so politicians, including this President can use our citizen and legal resident family and community members' votes to gain power.
Which would have made this the plan all along.Well at the very least we should know how everything is going by the end of the day.

The President is meeting with Schumer & Graham @ 3 p.m. today so whatever they come up with will be for all the world to see.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#8
03-11-2010, 09:55 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2009
221 posts
arodriguez's Avatar
arodriguez
500 AP
Let's hope Obama isn't doing this just for "damage control". I mean he really can't think that Hispanic voters will be appeased with a mere acknowledgment of the issue. We are all waiting for results in the form of a bill! I"m calling the White House at 3pm or 2pm my time to say that I support CIR and the DA. Who's with me?
__________________
Date Application Sent -09/20/2012, Express Mail
Date delivered -
Date acceptance letter of application received -
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action
Date Biometrics scheduled -
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
arodriguez
View Public Profile
Send a private message to arodriguez
Find all posts by arodriguez


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.