• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Durbin: Immigration bill 'unlikely' in '10 - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#21
05-12-2010, 09:55 PM
Member
Joined in May 2010
62 posts
lssbl4ze
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
I am being real. We only need 3 more Reps support and we have the 60.



Anyone have the exact list of Reps in Senate who do support Dream Act?
The problem is this is not real; 3 more Reps, however not all Democrats are going to vote Yes for a comprehensive immigration reform.

On the other hand, dream act does have enough off votes to pass.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
lssbl4ze
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lssbl4ze
Find all posts by lssbl4ze
#22
05-12-2010, 09:58 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by lssbl4ze View Post
The problem is this is not real; 3 more Reps, however not all Democrats are going to vote Yes for a comprehensive immigration reform.

On the other hand, dream act does have enough off votes to pass.
Well Reid said 56 votes. I am going by Reid. He is the majority speaker.

The key to pass CIR is Border Security.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#23
05-12-2010, 10:02 PM
Member
Joined in May 2010
62 posts
lssbl4ze
0 AP
That is what Reid thinks; Border Security is an excuse not the key.

Reid new CIR Plan offer Border Security, has any republican hoped in? NO.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
lssbl4ze
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lssbl4ze
Find all posts by lssbl4ze
#24
05-12-2010, 10:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
220 posts
plz-724
10 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
Dems may lose some seats in the elections but House will still be majority Dems. and we will gain some Rep support in Senate even if Dems aren't majority in the Senate.
Seriously dude, you have to stop posting senseless stuff up for your own good man. I know you want to be optimistic and everything and for that I thank you, but optimistic does not mean moronic. To that last part of your statement, how in the hell would more Republican seats in the senate mean support for us? In case you haven't been following the Republicans have been opposing EVERYTHING that the Democrats have proposed. So if the Democrats propose CIR when the Republicans control Congress, what do you think will happen to it? It will be shot down so quickly it'll make your head spin. So more Republican seats do not equal more support for us ANYWHERE.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
plz-724
View Public Profile
Send a private message to plz-724
Find all posts by plz-724
#25
05-12-2010, 10:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
189 posts
Vision
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
Well Reid said 56 votes. I am going by Reid. He is the majority speaker.

The key to pass CIR is Border Security.
If you go by border security, we will never get reform ever. Sure it can help but I think they will make excuses until not even 1 person can come illegally. What about people who overstayed their visas?

I just agree with the above posters. Totally lame excuses by Republicans when they bring up "border security not secure enough".

And besides you saw all 41 republicans say "NO" to anything pretty much Dems want to reform. And please, read some news. Graham is not on our side. And getting 4 more votes from the party of "NO!" is very hard at this time, when there are many other bills being talked on Senate floor. Please be realistic. Too much optimism is not healthy.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Vision
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Vision
Find all posts by Vision
#26
05-13-2010, 12:01 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by lssbl4ze View Post
That is what Reid thinks; Border Security is an excuse not the key.

Reid new CIR Plan offer Border Security, has any republican hoped in? NO.
They will when the bill is on the floor.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#27
05-13-2010, 12:03 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by plz-724 View Post
Seriously dude, you have to stop posting senseless stuff up for your own good man. I know you want to be optimistic and everything and for that I thank you, but optimistic does not mean moronic. To that last part of your statement, how in the hell would more Republican seats in the senate mean support for us? In case you haven't been following the Republicans have been opposing EVERYTHING that the Democrats have proposed. So if the Democrats propose CIR when the Republicans control Congress, what do you think will happen to it? It will be shot down so quickly it'll make your head spin. So more Republican seats do not equal more support for us ANYWHERE.
There were Rep support in 2007. If the bill does not pass before elections then Hispanics will vote for Rep and therefore CIR/Dream Act will get a lot of support from the Reps.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#28
05-13-2010, 12:05 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision View Post
If you go by border security, we will never get reform ever. Sure it can help but I think they will make excuses until not even 1 person can come illegally. What about people who overstayed their visas?

I just agree with the above posters. Totally lame excuses by Republicans when they bring up "border security not secure enough".

And besides you saw all 41 republicans say "NO" to anything pretty much Dems want to reform. And please, read some news. Graham is not on our side. And getting 4 more votes from the party of "NO!" is very hard at this time, when there are many other bills being talked on Senate floor. Please be realistic. Too much optimism is not healthy.
Well the border is not secure right now. If thats what the Republicans in Senate so be it. Alteast we will get a bill passed.

Graham is part of the CIR bill with Schumer. Why would he say no?

I still think bill be on the floor before elections, it may not pass in 2010 but it will in early 2011. 1986 bill passed after the mid-term elections.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#29
05-13-2010, 02:10 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
220 posts
plz-724
10 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
There were Rep support in 2007. If the bill does not pass before elections then Hispanics will vote for Rep and therefore CIR/Dream Act will get a lot of support from the Reps.
Dude in case you don't know, there is NO REPUBLICAN SUPPORT for CIR, NONE AT ALL. Graham pulled out of the sponsorship because he is not getting his way and Democratic Leaders wanted to move Immigration to the top of the list. He would/will more than likely vote NO, it is almost certain. So that is why Graham'd vote nay on his 'own' bill. Now stop saying saying that CIR has Republican support please.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
plz-724
View Public Profile
Send a private message to plz-724
Find all posts by plz-724
#30
05-13-2010, 02:12 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by plz-724 View Post
Dude in case you don't know, there is NO REPUBLICAN SUPPORT for CIR, NONE AT ALL. Graham pulled out of the sponsorship because he is not getting his way and Democratic Leaders wanted to move Immigration to the top of the list. He would/will more than likely vote NO, it is almost certain. So that is why Graham'd vote nay on his 'own' bill. Now stop saying saying that CIR has Republican support please.
DUDE. here is the solution:

This message is hidden because DA User is on your ignore list.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.