• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

(Opposing Side) Piecemeal Amnesty, Cont'd

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
Closed Thread
#1
06-11-2010, 04:33 PM
BANNED
Joined in Jul 2009
426 posts
withchemicals
30 AP
This is just a column by a person who's not so fond of people in our situation, but he does point out a lot of interesting points. It does seem that the recent Schumer comment regarding the private meeting has allowed our opponents to relish in our misfortune... but it's a salient fact that there are sympathetic people from all political spectra to students in our situation.

Lastly, he mentions that it seems that congressmen are using us "merely as props for tear-jerker news coverage designed to make the case for a mass amnesty." If possible, I'd like my mother to somehow receive amnesty... but at the same time I do feel the senators are currently simply citing the CIR as a means of delaying their handling of the DA/CIR until 2011 and to simply bolster their chances of passing the CIR in one fell swoop.

Quote:
Following up on my post Wednesday about debate inside the amnesty cabal about whether to abandon the comprehensive approach (pushing amnesty for all illegals) and try to push smaller, targeted amnesties: Yesterday afternoon, Frank Sharry, one of the chief pro-amnesty activists, published an "Open Letter to DREAM Activists." It was a defensive-sounding note, trying to give the false impression that his group had always been in favor of moving the Dream Act amnesty (for kids who've grown up here after being brought illegally by their parents before age 16) through Congress on its own. The comments give a sense of the bitterness of the disagreement, including a link to this report claiming that Chuck Schumer met with Dream Act supporters yesterday: "Immigrant youth and their allies were told by Senator Chuck Schumer that he was told by the leadership of Reform Immigration For America not to move forward with theDREAM Act ." Apparently, Schumer met with the DC-based amnesty lobbyists last week: "At that meeting, Ali Noorani, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, Frank Sharry of America's Voice, Deepak Bhargava of the Center for Community Change, and representatives of the Catholic church stated that they did not want Senator Schumer to move forward with theDREAM Act."

This kind of dissension on the other side is obviously an opportunity for schadenfreude, and I can't claim to be immune to the temptation. But there's a political opportunity here as well: A hawkish congressman has an opening to introduce legislation that includes a tightened-up version of theDream Act (it's obviously full of loopholes) combined with mandatory use of E-Verify (to limit opportunities for future kids to be put in this situation) plus an end to chain migration (the kids didn't break the law by coming here because they were underage, but none of those adults who did break the law should be allowed to benefit). Such a bill (which may already be in the works, for all I know) would be instructive — those genuinely concerned about this most-sympathetic group of illegals could support it, while those amnesty-supporters opposing it would be exposed as interested in these kids merely as props for tear-jerker news coverage designed to make the case for a mass amnesty.
It'd be favorable if AgJOBS and the DREAM Act could pass, and after seeing positive results, perhaps the chances of a broader immigration reform passing next year would be increased... Then again, I'm guessing that it'd be difficult to see the effects of AgJOBS/DA in a single year.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/pos...dlYTJlZjJiOGI=
Last edited by withchemicals; 06-11-2010 at 04:35 PM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
withchemicals
View Public Profile
Find all posts by withchemicals
#2
06-11-2010, 06:19 PM
Senior Member
From The Great State of Texas
Joined in Dec 2009
339 posts
DREAMactASAP's Avatar
DREAMactASAP
0 AP
What is with your signature man? Seriously, what are you trying to prove?

You just make us all look bad, by publicizing what somebody said they felt about you in a PRIVATE message. Grow up and be man enough to take criticism and accept the fact that not everybody will like you. Quit being so bitter!
__________________
Do not lose faith and do not lose heart. Never give up.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DREAMactASAP
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DREAMactASAP
Find all posts by DREAMactASAP
#3
06-11-2010, 06:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DREAMactASAP View Post
What is with your signature man? Seriously, what are you trying to prove?

You just make us all look bad, by publicizing what somebody said they felt about you in a PRIVATE message. Grow up and be man enough to take criticism and accept the fact that not everybody will like you. Quit being so bitter!
Withchemicals is a girl.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
#4
06-11-2010, 06:28 PM
BANNED
Joined in Jul 2009
426 posts
withchemicals
30 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DREAMactASAP View Post
What is with your signature man? Seriously, what are you trying to prove?

You just make us all look bad, by publicizing what somebody said they felt about you in a PRIVATE message. Grow up and be man enough to take criticism and accept the fact that not everybody will like you. Quit being so bitter!


I am open to criticism. What I don't condone is blatant bigotry and ignorance. I also don't condone messages such as the aforementioned private message being sent to me in private as a result of cowardice. It's not a question of bitterness, but rather serving well-deserved humiliation after one blatantly displays idiocy.
Last edited by withchemicals; 06-11-2010 at 06:31 PM..
Post your reply or quote more messages.
withchemicals
View Public Profile
Find all posts by withchemicals
Closed Thread


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.