• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

McCain's Response to DA. ref: e-mail from his staff member

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
10-03-2010, 11:13 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,655 posts
dado123
0 AP
I e-mail McCain's office with my Bio, and received below in qt/unqt from his D.C. Office on Oct 1, 2010:

QT
Dear Mr. ....

Thank you for contacting me regarding S. 729, the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act of 2009. I appreciate knowing your thoughts on this issue.

As you may know, the DREAM Act would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to apply for conditional permanent resident status if they entered the United States prior to their 16th birthday and have been present in our country for five years prior to the enactment of the legislation. It also requires that a young person meet certain eligibility requirements, including being of good moral character. No one would be eligible who is inadmissible or deportable under criminal, security, smuggling, or illegal entrant or immigration violation grounds. In order to obtain permanent status within the United States, these individuals would have to either attend college or enlist in the military.

While I recognize that the young people who would be covered under the DREAM Act entered our country as children and the decision to illegally enter was not theirs, I also know that the majority of the Arizonan’s that I have heard from want us to secure the border before considering immigration legislation. Until the border is secured, I do not believe Arizonans would support any efforts to reform our immigration laws.

S. 729 was introduced on March 26, 2009, and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Please be assured that I will keep your concerns in mind should this legislation be considered by the full Senate.

Again, thank you for contacting me. Please feel free to contact me on this or any other issue of concern.

Sincerely,


John McCain
United States Senator

JM:ds
UNQT

Seems he is neither a yay or nay, with come campaigning believe we can get his support.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#2
10-03-2010, 11:36 PM
Member
From NYC
Joined in Apr 2010
97 posts
VicTheWick
0 AP
He never even read your email. His staffer replied back to you to show his superiors that he does his job. Neither him or McCain care for our lives. I'm really glad McCain/Palin are not president/vice president. Thank God!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VicTheWick
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VicTheWick
Find all posts by VicTheWick
#3
10-03-2010, 11:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
783 posts
victor85
280 AP
You'll have to wait until McCain wins the election before he works on immigration reform again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
I e-mail McCain's office with my Bio, and received below in qt/unqt from his D.C. Office on Oct 1, 2010:

QT
Dear Mr. ....

Thank you for contacting me regarding S. 729, the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act of 2009. I appreciate knowing your thoughts on this issue.

As you may know, the DREAM Act would allow the children of undocumented immigrants to apply for conditional permanent resident status if they entered the United States prior to their 16th birthday and have been present in our country for five years prior to the enactment of the legislation. It also requires that a young person meet certain eligibility requirements, including being of good moral character. No one would be eligible who is inadmissible or deportable under criminal, security, smuggling, or illegal entrant or immigration violation grounds. In order to obtain permanent status within the United States, these individuals would have to either attend college or enlist in the military.


Seems he is neither a yay or nay, with come campaigning believe we can get his support.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
victor85
View Public Profile
Send a private message to victor85
Find all posts by victor85
#4
10-04-2010, 10:18 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
412 posts
Invictus
20 AP
Follow up with specifics on what "securing the border" entails, and what benchmarks are being used to determine whether the border is secured or not.

Don't let the cowards hide behind their words.
__________________
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Invictus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Invictus
Find all posts by Invictus
#5
10-04-2010, 10:31 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2010
200 posts
sabzon
0 AP
What if all Dreamers just started their own grassroots project a.k.a a corporation that creates wealth and boost our local economies? Let's just bypass the politics...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
sabzon
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sabzon
Find all posts by sabzon
#6
10-04-2010, 05:07 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2010
354 posts
1L-Deferred
0 AP
McCain will most likely support/vote for DA after his re-election is secured. He's just not enough of a Maverick to stand on DA on principle grounds.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
1L-Deferred
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 1L-Deferred
Find all posts by 1L-Deferred
#7
10-04-2010, 05:13 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2009
182 posts
Biblio
0 AP
His re-election is secured, polls show him with a 20% point lead, and there is no way Arizona is voting a Democrat for the Senate. I don't think he would vote for Dream Act, even in the lame duck session.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Biblio
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Biblio
Find all posts by Biblio
#8
10-04-2010, 06:56 PM
Moderator
From Illinois/Florida
Joined in Jul 2009
2,219 posts
buckminsterfullerene's Avatar
buckminsterfullerene
270 AP
Unfortunately I can't shake the feeling the that Arizona law managed to polarize an entire state by sort of forcing the hispanic vote out of the equation. First it forced the undocumented to flee the state, then businesses that catered to the hispanic started seeing their profits and customer base plummet and finally there is the law that targets and burdens the hispanic people which we all know are not the only undocumented immigrants in this country, they just happen to represent the majority. The result is a state with an anti-hispanic law that is stressing USC hispanics to the point that they may decide to leave the state and favor more hispanic friendly states.

The issue that I see with all this is that we may see something similar to the state of Wyoming, where a relatively small portion of the country (the state has a population just above 0.5 million) selects a senator that has the same weight as another senator selected by a much larger population, thus also having the potential to polarize the senate. I worry senators are jumping on this law to ultimately eliminate their worries of the hispanic vote.

but maybe I am just being irrationally paranoid.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
buckminsterfullerene
View Public Profile
Send a private message to buckminsterfullerene
Find all posts by buckminsterfullerene
#9
10-04-2010, 07:13 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2010
154 posts
RC010
0 AP
Unfortunately I can't shake the feeling the that Arizona law managed to polarize an entire state by sort of forcing the hispanic vote out of the equation. First it forced the undocumented to flee the state, then businesses that catered to the hispanic started seeing their profits and customer base plummet and finally there is the law that targets and burdens the hispanic people which we all know are not the only undocumented immigrants in this country, they just happen to represent the majority. The result is a state with an anti-hispanic law that is stressing USC hispanics to the point that they may decide to leave the state and favor more hispanic friendly states.

The issue that I see with all this is that we may see something similar to the state of Wyoming, where a relatively small portion of the country (the state has a population just above 0.5 million) selects a senator that has the same weight as another senator selected by a much larger population, thus also having the potential to polarize the senate. I worry senators are jumping on this law to ultimately eliminate their worries of the hispanic vote.

but maybe I am just being irrationally paranoid.



Can you summarize this.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
RC010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to RC010
Find all posts by RC010
#10
10-04-2010, 07:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2010
634 posts
Qualia
20 AP
Why do you people want McCain so much? leave the guy alone, we don't want him, and we don't need him...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Qualia
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Qualia
Find all posts by Qualia
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.