• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Reid for Plan To Put House-Passed DREAM Act Bill on Senate Floor Next Week - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
#11
12-09-2010, 03:10 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
3 posts
adrian55
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB124 View Post
What does this 59-40 vote mean? We only came 1 vote away?
A lot of you guys who are freaking out need to go and read how the US government works go before asking any questions. We are claiming that we deserve the Dream act because of our scholar achievements so by you guys just asking lame questions demerits our cause. Come on guys do some research.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
adrian55
View Public Profile
Send a private message to adrian55
Find all posts by adrian55
#12
12-09-2010, 03:11 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
I would bring back the original Senate version to get more votes.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#13
12-09-2010, 03:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2010
354 posts
1L-Deferred
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrian55 View Post
A lot of you guys who are freaking out need to go and read how the US government works go before asking any questions. We are claiming that we deserve the Dream act because of our scholar achievements so by you guys just asking lame questions demerits our cause. Come on guys do some research.
Cut your shit assholina. Not everybody here knows the House procedures and that's a legitimate question.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
1L-Deferred
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 1L-Deferred
Find all posts by 1L-Deferred
#14
12-09-2010, 03:20 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2009
391 posts
oneday6
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1L-Deferred View Post
Cut your shit assholina. Not everybody here knows the House procedures and that's a legitimate question.
Questions about what about happened procedural wise are legit. I bet if you ask your local history teacher about the procedural stuff that occurred today he/she wouldn't be able to explain it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
oneday6
View Public Profile
Send a private message to oneday6
Find all posts by oneday6
#15
12-09-2010, 04:00 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
For everyone that is confused about the 59-40 vote today, here is an explanation of Reid's strategy and what today's vote was all about.

Quote:
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Thursday, December 9, pulled a procedural rabbit out of his hat to prevent what would almost certainly have been a losing vote from occurring on the DREAM Act. The Majority Leader acted shortly after 11:15 am EST, when he moved to table his previously made motion that the Senate proceed to consideration of S. 3992, the Senate version of the DREAM Act. The Senate agreed to his motion by a vote of 59-40, thereby preventing the Senate from conducting a previously scheduled cloture vote in relation to the DREAM Act.

The action on Thursday in the Senate is considerd a victory for supporters of the DREAM Act. It enables them to avoid a potentially momentum-killing losing vote on the Senate bill, gives them as much as a week to continue to pound potential swing vote Senators, and could set up a situation where Republicans in the Senate have no refuge in procedure and have to cast a yes or no vote on the DREAM Act on the bill's merits.

The next action on the DREAM Act in the Senate is likely to take place next week or later.

Following the vote on the motion to table, Majority Leader Reid and Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-IL) reasserted their commitment to bringing the DREAM Act before the Senate for a vote, saying, "the Senate will move to the House-passed version of the bill later this month. In the mean time, we will work with House leaders and the Administration to ensure that the DREAM Act will be law by the end of the year.

“The DREAM Act is not a symbolic vote. We owe it to the young men and women whose lives will be affected by this bill, and to the country which needs their service in the military and their skills in building our economy, to honestly address this issue. Members on both sides of the aisle need to ask themselves if we can afford to say to these talented young men and women there is no place in America for you.”
- MicEvHill.Com

Now that we all understand, we must focus on the 'On the Fence' Senators. So, continue calling and faxing their offices.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
#16
12-09-2010, 07:23 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
117 posts
QuePasa87
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
I would bring back the original Senate version to get more votes.
Trying to make any changes in our favor would surely do more harm than good at this point. Be realistic.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
QuePasa87
View Public Profile
Send a private message to QuePasa87
Find all posts by QuePasa87
#17
12-09-2010, 07:45 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuePasa87 View Post
Trying to make any changes in our favor would surely do more harm than good at this point. Be realistic.
How about stripping other parts off like sponsorships to family members?

Make it 20 year conditional?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#18
12-09-2010, 07:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
1,386 posts
Mona Lisa's Avatar
Mona Lisa
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
How about stripping other parts off like sponsorships to family members?

Make it 20 year conditional?
We cant even sponsor anyone for about 15 years. You sound like that guy that said that each dreamer would bring 179 family members once this passes. I don't even have one person to sponsor
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Mona Lisa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Mona Lisa
Find all posts by Mona Lisa
#19
12-09-2010, 11:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
2,582 posts
Ali
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
How about stripping other parts off like sponsorships to family members?

Make it 20 year conditional?
wow....that's a big shift in attitude. I'm starting to like you...
__________________
♠♣IllegalBrahs Crew♠♣
''I'm developing a social network where people call each other on the phone & then see each other in person. ~~ Chris Rock''
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ali
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ali
Find all posts by Ali
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.