• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

September

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Obama proposes a waiver of 10 year penalty for undocumented immigrants

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
01-06-2012, 01:35 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,714 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/07/us...cans.html?_r=1

Sucks that you still would have to leave the country, but at least you don't have to wait the 3-10 years to come back...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#2
01-06-2012, 02:18 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,111 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
This only affects immediate relatives of U.S citizens and permanent residents - those not subject to the visa numerical limits.

To qualify:

You have to be married to a citizen or be a child of a citizen under age 21. And show "extreme" hardship. Wait times for waivers and visas will be weeks rather than months, assuming you meet the extreme hardship standard.

Again, not really great news for those who aren't married (to citizens) or are aged 21 and over, in the case of a citizen parent. From the same NYTimes article: "White House officials are resigned to the fact that there will most likely be no progress before the November elections on immigration legislation that President Obama supports that would give legal status to millions of illegal immigrants". Not real help to most of the 10 million people waiting for a bit of good luck.

P.S. This proposed regulation and rulemaking change was written in that "Alternatives to Immigration Reform" memo from USCIS and DSH almost two years ago. It was to have been done in fiscal year 2010 with the final rule published by June of last year. The delay is pure gamesmanship from Obama to plot his re-election.

http://www.propublica.org/documents/...gration-reform
Last edited by dtrt09; 01-06-2012 at 02:33 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#3
01-06-2012, 03:32 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
What if the candidate is over 21 years of a USC parent?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#4
01-06-2012, 04:46 AM
Senior Member
From Midwest
Joined in Aug 2008
678 posts
2dreamORnot2dream's Avatar
2dreamORnot2dream
0 AP
Fuck this! Why not wave the ban for dreamers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2dreamORnot2dream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2dreamORnot2dream
Find all posts by 2dreamORnot2dream
#5
01-06-2012, 01:58 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
124 posts
dexterchach
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
What if the candidate is over 21 years of a USC parent?
The Dream Act will pass this year.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dexterchach
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dexterchach
#6
01-06-2012, 02:26 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexterchach View Post
The Dream Act will pass this year.
I think so.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#7
01-06-2012, 03:20 PM
Senior Member
From an immigration detention center with my pal Chyno
Joined in Jul 2011
4,857 posts
carnivore's Avatar
carnivore
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dexterchach View Post
The Dream Act will pass this year.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
carnivore
View Public Profile
Send a private message to carnivore
Find all posts by carnivore
#8
01-07-2012, 08:59 PM
Senior Member
From California
Joined in Jan 2009
1,438 posts
Dreamer X's Avatar
Dreamer X
0 AP
Eh sounds dumb
__________________
"I shall seize Fate by the throat; it shall certainly not bend and crush me completely" -Ludwig von Beethoven
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dreamer X
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dreamer X
Find all posts by Dreamer X
#9
01-09-2012, 02:43 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,675 posts
TexasDreamy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
What if the candidate is over 21 years of a USC parent?
This looks to be a memo that is meant to fix that!!!

If you're an under 21 minor child of a USC, then you don't have to worry about the 3/10 year ban. It looks like they're considering expediting all of the hardship waivers. omgomgomg. This is pretty good news.

I'm scared as hell of going back to my home country, even if only for a bit, but I think a few weeks stay would be doable!

Edit: Foudn the actual memo.

Alas..

Quote:
USCIS intends to limit this process change to aliens who are immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, as defined in section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), who must depart from the United States to obtain immigrant visas, and whose U.S. citizen spouse or parent would suffer extreme hardship if the applicant were denied admission to the United States. The term “immediate relative” means the spouse, parent or child (unmarried and under 21 years old) of a U.S. citizen.
This looks to be aimed at people who are actually EWI, not for people like us

Although wait.. Being EWI is grounds for inadmissibility.

Quote:
USCIS intends to further limit this procedural change to waivers filed by immediate relatives of U.S. citizens whose only ground of inadmissibility is the three- or ten-year unlawful presence bar under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) or (II) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) or (II).
So this memo would help.. whom exactly?

+ Not children under 21 of USC since they don't need a waiver because they are immediate relatives and their overstay is forgiven already.
+ Not visa overstay spouses of USC since they don't need a waiver because they are immediate relatives and their overstay is forgiven already.
+ Same with parents.

Just who is this memo going to help?!
Last edited by TexasDreamy; 01-09-2012 at 02:57 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexasDreamy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexasDreamy
Find all posts by TexasDreamy
#10
01-13-2012, 12:58 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2010
115 posts
karenc1023's Avatar
karenc1023
0 AP
but how about if i was adopted by u.s citizens when I was 14? but now I'm 23
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
karenc1023
View Public Profile
Send a private message to karenc1023
Find all posts by karenc1023


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.