• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Organized labor says closer to deal on immigration reform

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
03-28-2013, 09:20 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
If Labor and Business can unite with specific language behind a guestworker program the odds of an immigration deal I think could be better than 50-50.
Quote:
(Reuters) - U.S. labor unions said on Thursday they were closer to resolving problems with wages for future unskilled immigrant workers like janitors and housekeepers - an issue that has stalled progress on a U.S. Senate proposal to overhaul the immigration system.

"We have moved off poverty level wages and are moving forward and are working on a standard that will protect U.S. workers," said Andrea Zuniga DiBitetto, legislative representative for the biggest union the AFL-CIO.


Late last week, disputes over a new visa program for foreign workers between the AFL-CIO, the labor federation, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce threatened to derail immigration reform talks between a group of four Republican and four Democratic Senators.

The AFL-CIO had accused Republicans and businesses of trying to undercut wages. And the Chamber, the biggest business lobby, said unions were jeopardizing the immigration reform effort.

Now the AFL-CIO is saying that the unions, the Chamber and lawmakers are coalescing around the idea of using a wage standard that already exists in current law rather than specific wage levels.

Both high-skilled and low-skilled visa programs specify that visas will only be issued if they do not drive down the wages of those doing the same job in the United States.

"I think there is an agreement that it should be a standard and we are finalizing what that standard should say," said DiBitetto. "We are working with them to find the language that the senators and labor and the Chamber can agree to," she said.

The Chamber also a took a more conciliatory tone on Thursday and said any temporary worker program would require that an immigrant worker "be paid the greater of actual wages being paid to comparable American workers or the prevailing wages as determined by the Department of Labor."


The bipartisan Senate group is aiming to introduce legislation in April that would give millions of illegal immigrants a way to earn citizenship as well create a process for dealing with the future flow of unskilled labor into the country.

The temporary worker program is one of the remaining issues left for senators to resolve and one that has contributed to the downfall of other immigration reform efforts in the past.

The unions and the business community have already reached an agreement on other contentious parts of the new worker program, including how many visas will be issued per year, according to the AFL-CIO.

Unlike existing visa programs, the new one would take into consideration the health of the economy and unemployment figures and expand and contract the flow of workers based on those factors, the labor group said.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
03-28-2013, 10:24 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
News great.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#3
03-28-2013, 10:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
291 posts
Tovicmar
0 AP

Good news!
__________________
Application Accepted: 9/27/2012
Biometric Done: 10/17/2012
Approved: 1/17/2013
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Tovicmar
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Tovicmar
Find all posts by Tovicmar
#4
03-28-2013, 10:48 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
524 posts
bigdreamer2010
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
If Labor and Business can unite with specific language behind a guestworker program the odds of an immigration deal I think could be better than 50-50.
Don’t you think that the probability for passing is greater than 50-50? What I believe is that there are only two things that can stop passage: the guest worker program and opposition from conservatives.

We can begin ruling out the opposition from the conservative base applying pressure to their politicians based on the tea party. You have Rand and Rubio, both easily 2016 presidential candidates, supporting the principles in the Senate Bill. Then lets add the polling in South Carolina and Iowa; two very conservative states. However, a majority of republican primary voters are for the CIR bill.

I just believe that nobody really cares about the morals of documenting the undocumented. When I say nobody I mean the people that really matter. The people that run things. Its all about the guest worker. Despite ALL of the complexities in overhauling the immigration system the ONLY topic still being debated is the wages of the guest worker.

A brief survey of US history lets you know what’s going on. History repeats itself. This country has been built on cheap exploitive labor. Whether its from people picking cotton, or mining gold, or harvesting crops there has always been the need for cheap unskilled labor. But in modern times, and to the dislike of big business that needs cheap labor, America has labor laws establishing a minimum wage. Also Americans in general have a higher standard of living and are not willing or able to accept those jobs at those wages.

Look at this article from the LA Times in 1985 about the guest worker. It is the same exact thing that is going on today: http://articles.latimes.com/1985-09-...1_harvest-time

Think about it. This is America. We’re talking about the country that spends more on its military than all of the rest of the world combined. This is the country that can pull $700 billion out of thin air to give to banks that behave recklessly. This is the country that can literally invade and occupy another country off the premise of “weapons of mass destruction” and never find them even 10 years later.

Are you telling me it can’t secure its southern border? Does that make sense? The reason why we had the influx of illegal border crossings is because it was wanted. Its simple Economics. A surplus of low skilled workers leads to lower wages which leads to higher profits.

There’s a reason why the enforcement measures from 1986 were not enforced. Its because they were not wanted, but the labor was. Now lets fast forward to 2013. The reason that there is pressure on the Republican party to support the “documentation of the undcoumentated” is because the US citizen children of those workers that they let in are now young and voting Democratic. They apparently didn’t see this coming with their lax border policies and probably more people came in than they expected. The Tea party tried to fight the tide for a while but they even know that they can’t fight the numbers.

So now we’re at the point where the Republicans are supporting a pathway to citizenship but there is still the issue of the indentured servants. If you document those who are undocumented , ie awarding them RIGHTS and FREEDOMS, who do you have to EXPLOIT? That’s why they need the guest worker. A person with the ability to gain education and learn skills is no longer exploitable. They will not work for those wages. So you need a steady flow of exploitable people. And you don’t only need them to be here but you need to be able to pay them less than what you would pay Americans!! That’s what’s going on with this bill.

Reference the 1985 article and how similar it is to today’s discussion and remember that despite ALL of the things that are going into this bill (the 2007 bill was 700+ pages), the only thing that is still a problem is a steady flow of cheap, exploitable labor. Once this is hammered out I see no other resistance in the way of CIR. Its passing this year.

The “fruit growers” no longer have the complete leverage over republicans as they did with the passage of the ’86 bill and the derailing the 07 (remember the 07 bill failed because the guest worker program ended in 5 years) because now the republicans’ chances to gain the white house shrink every single month.
TLDR:

Once the guest worker wages are figured out CIR passes

/end rant
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bigdreamer2010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bigdreamer2010
Find all posts by bigdreamer2010
#5
03-28-2013, 11:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdreamer2010 View Post
Don’t you think that the probability for passing is greater than 50-50? What I believe is that there are only two things that can stop passage: the guest worker program and opposition from conservatives.......
No,because I think more strategically on if an immigration overhaul can simply pass just one in a multitude of partisaned and complex stages within the confines of the place called Congress based on the immigration language and at what stage it is in.I also think one should think of every immigration effort as being unique because no past and present sworn in Congresses are alike.

I've always given any reform effort its due caution and irregardless of if the articles may seem on point with certain information I just treat it as such and reserve judgment when action has actually taken place.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#6
03-29-2013, 12:45 AM
BANNED
Joined in Oct 2012
2,487 posts
Happyman0607
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdreamer2010 View Post
Don’t you think that the probability for passing is greater than 50-50? What I believe is that there are only two things that can stop passage: the guest worker program and opposition from conservatives.

We can begin ruling out the opposition from the conservative base applying pressure to their politicians based on the tea party. You have Rand and Rubio, both easily 2016 presidential candidates, supporting the principles in the Senate Bill. Then lets add the polling in South Carolina and Iowa; two very conservative states. However, a majority of republican primary voters are for the CIR bill.

I just believe that nobody really cares about the morals of documenting the undocumented. When I say nobody I mean the people that really matter. The people that run things. Its all about the guest worker. Despite ALL of the complexities in overhauling the immigration system the ONLY topic still being debated is the wages of the guest worker.

A brief survey of US history lets you know what’s going on. History repeats itself. This country has been built on cheap exploitive labor. Whether its from people picking cotton, or mining gold, or harvesting crops there has always been the need for cheap unskilled labor. But in modern times, and to the dislike of big business that needs cheap labor, America has labor laws establishing a minimum wage. Also Americans in general have a higher standard of living and are not willing or able to accept those jobs at those wages.

Look at this article from the LA Times in 1985 about the guest worker. It is the same exact thing that is going on today: http://articles.latimes.com/1985-09-...1_harvest-time

Think about it. This is America. We’re talking about the country that spends more on its military than all of the rest of the world combined. This is the country that can pull $700 billion out of thin air to give to banks that behave recklessly. This is the country that can literally invade and occupy another country off the premise of “weapons of mass destruction” and never find them even 10 years later.

Are you telling me it can’t secure its southern border? Does that make sense? The reason why we had the influx of illegal border crossings is because it was wanted. Its simple Economics. A surplus of low skilled workers leads to lower wages which leads to higher profits.

There’s a reason why the enforcement measures from 1986 were not enforced. Its because they were not wanted, but the labor was. Now lets fast forward to 2013. The reason that there is pressure on the Republican party to support the “documentation of the undcoumentated” is because the US citizen children of those workers that they let in are now young and voting Democratic. They apparently didn’t see this coming with their lax border policies and probably more people came in than they expected. The Tea party tried to fight the tide for a while but they even know that they can’t fight the numbers.

So now we’re at the point where the Republicans are supporting a pathway to citizenship but there is still the issue of the indentured servants. If you document those who are undocumented , ie awarding them RIGHTS and FREEDOMS, who do you have to EXPLOIT? That’s why they need the guest worker. A person with the ability to gain education and learn skills is no longer exploitable. They will not work for those wages. So you need a steady flow of exploitable people. And you don’t only need them to be here but you need to be able to pay them less than what you would pay Americans!! That’s what’s going on with this bill.

Reference the 1985 article and how similar it is to today’s discussion and remember that despite ALL of the things that are going into this bill (the 2007 bill was 700+ pages), the only thing that is still a problem is a steady flow of cheap, exploitable labor. Once this is hammered out I see no other resistance in the way of CIR. Its passing this year.

The “fruit growers” no longer have the complete leverage over republicans as they did with the passage of the ’86 bill and the derailing the 07 (remember the 07 bill failed because the guest worker program ended in 5 years) because now the republicans’ chances to gain the white house shrink every single month.
TLDR:

Once the guest worker wages are figured out CIR passes

/end rant
Yup.. You're absolutely right.. And P.S. I'd love to see Rand Paul become the president in 2016.. He kinda reminds me of John F Kennedy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Happyman0607
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Happyman0607
#7
03-29-2013, 01:28 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
Good stuff. Lets hope they come to an agreement.
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.