• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

June

  »
S M T W T F S
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Romney’s ‘Self-Deport’ Option Could Be Part of House Immigration Plan

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#1
04-30-2013, 11:42 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,572 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://blogs.rollcall.com/goppers/ho...deport-option/
Quote:
The House immigration working group is mulling a proposal that involves “self-deportation” as part of a strategy to make a comprehensive overhaul acceptable to conservatives.

The concept was thrust into the national conversation by 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. The former Massachusetts governor infamously suggested during the GOP primary campaign that illegal immigrants might leave the U.S. voluntarily — or “self-deport” — over time if the government eliminated incentives for them to stay, including the ability to find work. Romney was responding to a question about how to address the problem of undocumented residents short of forcible government roundups and deportations.

The remark was ridiculed by Democrats and later credited with costing Romney the Hispanic support he needed to run competitively against President Barack Obama. But the bipartisan House immigration working group is developing a proposal designed to make self-deportation an attractive option for undocumented immigrants as they navigate what would presumably be a completely new legal framework. The plan was detailed by a Republican congressional aide familiar with the House working group’s negotiations.

As I reported Monday, this new system would require illegal immigrants who want to legalize to plead guilty to breaking the law and accept a sentence of probation in federal court. The arduous path to citizenship also would mandate that newly legalized immigrants pay fines and back taxes. However, undocumented immigrants who either couldn’t afford or simply didn’t want to pay penalties that might run in the tens of thousands of dollars could avoid doing so.

Under a House working group proposal, illegal immigrants who wanted to forgo the payment of back taxes and fines would first have to identify as undocumented with federal authorities, probably within six months of the new immigration law going into effect. They would have another six months to leave the country, after which they could get in line to immigrate legally under a new system that would include expanded visa programs for high- and low-skilled workers intended to facilitate entry into the country for the purposes of obtaining employment.

“You can take advantage of new visa programs and not have to pay those back taxes,” the GOP congressional aide said.


The revamped and strengthened e-verify component of the proposed immigration overhaul is supposed to discourage these former undocumented immigrants from once again crossing the border illegally. How? House immigration negotiators are proposing stiff penalties for employees who hire undocumented individuals, and would simplify the e-verify process to make the checks easy to process. Businesses would have anywhere from six months to 18 months to achieve compliance, depending on their size.

Just last week, House Judiciary Chairman Robert W. Goodlatte, R-Va., scheduled hearings for an e-verify bill sponsored by immigration hardliner Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, and a bill to overhaul the employment visa program. The latter legislation was authored by Goodlatte. The House Judiciary committee also plans to grant a hearing to the Senate’s “gang of eight” proposal after it returns from this week’s recess.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
04-30-2013, 11:48 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
524 posts
bigdreamer2010
0 AP
Lol if you can't afford the fines more than likely you won't qualify for a high skilled visa. The house GOP is so full of it.
Last edited by bigdreamer2010; 04-30-2013 at 11:50 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bigdreamer2010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bigdreamer2010
Find all posts by bigdreamer2010
#3
05-01-2013, 12:22 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
617 posts
gebodupa
0 AP
Sure, because "undocumented" people with income levels hovering above the poverty line, are known to have thousands of dollars hidden under their mattresses.


I guess, the silver lining is that with incomes so low their back taxes will likely be very low. Stupid plan, regardless.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
gebodupa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gebodupa
Find all posts by gebodupa
#4
05-01-2013, 12:48 AM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
6,010 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
"Touching back" (fancy way saying "leaving and praying to be re-admitted") was what made the 2007 bill a no-go (really, 2007 bill was fucking atrocious), and it is what will make this one a no-go either.

The leadership of the house either:
1) Is staffed by fucking retards.
2) Is staffed by assholes trying to covertly kill the reform.
__________________
LPR these days
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#5
05-01-2013, 01:02 AM
BANNED
Joined in Oct 2012
2,487 posts
Happyman0607
0 AP
Self-deport my fucking ass.. I'm not going no where..

Why don't they self-deport? Where the hell do they expect us to go? To a country we know nothing about? So out of touch its a little scary.. These politicians don't understand that us going back would be like us throwing them in china and telling them that's your home..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Happyman0607
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Happyman0607
#6
05-01-2013, 01:12 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
I like this one. Self Deport should be an option.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#7
05-01-2013, 01:19 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2013
127 posts
satnam
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
I like this one. Self Deport should be an option.
It always was and is an "option". You can self deport now if you wish. Nothing stopping you.

It doesn't need to be allowed by some plan when it can be done already.
__________________
Application Sent: 10/19/2012 | Delivered: 10/21/2012 | Acceptance Confirmation: 10/28/2012 (vermont) | Biometrics Walk In: 11/13/2012 | Transfered: 03/06/2013 (Nebraska) | Transferred Part 2: 03/22/2012 | Approval: 4/23/2013
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
satnam
View Public Profile
Send a private message to satnam
Find all posts by satnam
#8
05-01-2013, 01:26 AM
Member
Joined in Dec 2012
53 posts
RabbitsFoot
0 AP
do we have a clarification of "probation sentence in federal court" yet? do they simply want us to pay them a fine or they will also scar us for life with a criminal record?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
RabbitsFoot
View Public Profile
Send a private message to RabbitsFoot
Find all posts by RabbitsFoot
#9
05-01-2013, 01:30 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2010
347 posts
NK74
0 AP
Actually, I would be very open in such a provision. I don't want to get on the roadway to citizenship, not now in any case and especially with the tough roadway ahead.

I would like to be able to travel back in the country though and not suffer through the 3-10 year bar.

Can you give me the right to return when I want to even as a tourist? I am signing up for it in a heartbeat.
Last edited by NK74; 05-01-2013 at 01:36 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
NK74
View Public Profile
Send a private message to NK74
Find all posts by NK74
#10
05-01-2013, 01:33 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by satnam View Post
It always was and is an "option". You can self deport now if you wish. Nothing stopping you.

It doesn't need to be allowed by some plan when it can be done already.
I know I guess they could continue to make this an option?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.