• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

BIA decision on Advance Parole

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
11-26-2013, 03:00 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2009
658 posts
iah's Avatar
iah
0 AP
Thought this would help some of you requesting AP. A case from a couple from India is on our side. The case is called Matter of Arrabally and Yarrabelly


http://www.immigratefast.com/immigra...dvance-parole/


Immigration Benefits for DACA Recipients who Travel on Advance Parole
September 17, 2013
By Jacqueline Shi

Recent changes in immigration law may allow Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients to obtain lawful permanent residence in the United States by using advance parole to adjust their status.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the discretionary authority to parole an individual into the United States on certain humanitarian or public benefit bases. Advance parole offers an individual who is in the United States advance authorization to enter the country after temporary travel abroad for humanitarian, educational, or employment reasons.

On June 15, 2012, the Secretary of DHS announced that certain individuals, who entered the United States before turning 16 and who meet certain guidelines, may pursue Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).[1] One of DACA’s benefits is that its recipient is authorized to apply for advance parole. When such a recipient is granted advance parole, travels abroad, and then returns to the United States, she is considered an “applicant for admission” when she is “paroled” into the United States within the meaning of Immigration and Nationality Act § 245(a). Moreover, in April 2012, the Board of Immigration Appeals held that leaving the United States on advance parole did not effectuate a “departure” for the purposes of triggering the unlawful presence bar.[2] As such, advance parole may make some DACA recipients, who entered the United States without inspection, but who are pursuing lawful permanent residence through immigrant visa petitions, eligible for adjustment of status.

DACA recipients who would be eligible to take advantage of this immigration benefit will be those who qualify as “immediate relatives” of U.S. citizens, such as the spouse or child of a U.S. citizen or parent of an adult U.S. citizen. For example, generally, an individual who is married to a U.S. citizen, but had previously entered the United States without inspection, cannot apply for adjustment of status to gain lawful permanent residence. However, in light of Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly, when an individual who is married to a U.S. citizen and was granted DACA leaves and then returns to the United States on advance parole, she is properly “inspected and admitted,” and thus eligible for adjustment of status.

Unfortunately, DACA recipients who are in a preference category and who have worked without authorization, or have been in the country without lawful status, would not qualify to adjust status under INA § 245(a).[3] However, for those DACA recipients who are married to a U.S. citizen or qualify as children of U.S. citizens, traveling on advance parole may be advantageous in that it not only terminates their exposure to the unlawful presence ground of inadmissibility, but it also establishes their eligibility to adjust status in the United States.

[1] Individuals who are eligible for DACA may request consideration of deferred action for a period of two years, subject to renewal, and would then be eligible for work authorization.



[2] See Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly, 25 I&N Dec. 771 (BIA 2012).



[3] See INA § 245(c)(2); 8 CFR § 245.1(d)(3); AFM at 40.9.
__________________
Sent app 9/10
Bio 9/30
EAD 10/22
Sent renewal 7/15
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
iah
View Public Profile
Send a private message to iah
Find all posts by iah
#2
11-26-2013, 05:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,656 posts
dado123
0 AP
Can immigration law be any more complicated ! Good find worth researching further.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#3
11-26-2013, 06:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2009
658 posts
iah's Avatar
iah
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
Can immigration law be any more complicated ! Good find worth researching further.
Check this Attorneys website. I hope yall get a good understanding if you are applying for AP and trying to AOS.


http://musingsonimmigration.blogspot...stment-of.html
__________________
Sent app 9/10
Bio 9/30
EAD 10/22
Sent renewal 7/15
Last edited by iah; 11-26-2013 at 09:15 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
iah
View Public Profile
Send a private message to iah
Find all posts by iah
#4
11-26-2013, 11:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
637 posts
MitchAPalooza23
0 AP
This is certainly beneficial for those looking to adjust their status. In regards to unlawful presence, I believe the below highlights concrete evidence that traveling with AP will not trigger the 3/10 year ban.
Quote:
Indeed, some DACA recipients have received advance parole authorizations (Form I -
512L) explicitly stating that traveling abroad under advance parole is not
a departure within the context of INA § 212(a)(9)(B), pursuant to Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly
Although, it is important to note:
Quote:
an I-512L issued more recently by the USCIS Nebraska Service Center does not include a reference to Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly or an explanation of the case’s impact on DACA recipients.
Either way, I think the experiences shared by those who have traveled and returned with AP in combination with the above documents make it apparent that it is relatively safe for an individual with DACA to travel with AP.

https://cliniclegal.org/sites/defaul...recipients.pdf
__________________
Approval - 10/2012.
Renewal #1 - 10/2014.
Renewal #2 - 9/2016.
Renewal #3 - Pending.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MitchAPalooza23
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MitchAPalooza23
Find all posts by MitchAPalooza23


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.