Legal fight over Obama's immigration orders may outlast his presidency - Page 2
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demise
There is no waiver for EWI (there are a few exceptions like 245(i)). EWI is cleared the moment one leaves - but that tends to trigger a re-entry ban due to illegal presence, for which I-601 or I-601A waiver is needed. Problem being - that waiver is not available to parents (unless they have a LPR/USC spouse or parent of their own).
DAPA would bypass the issue with EWI parents of citizens and their ineligibility for I-601/A waivers. Get DAPA, get AP, travel, return, have your kid petition you once he/she turns 21, you'll have your green card within 6 months. I think it will prevail. The administration has been too stupid with this lawsuit, much more stupid than one would normally expect. They'll publish the regulations and Hanen will go back to being a two-bit judge in a backwater court in rural Texas. The lawsuit will die on its own since it'll be moot. |
All the news are positive about prevailing eventually but the problem is time. The question is when? Eventually, it will go to Supreme Court but do you think it will pass before 2016 Elections? I don't think they are stupid. I just think it is all political football. DACA 2012 was pure political decision as well. If it does prevail right before elections then chances are good for Hillary as well as Dems taking house and senate. That is what we want right?
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA
All the news are positive about prevailing eventually but the problem is time. The question is when? Eventually, it will go to Supreme Court but do you think it will pass before 2016 Elections? I don't think they are stupid. I just think it is all political football. DACA 2012 was pure political decision as well. If it does prevail right before elections then chances are good for Hillary as well as Dems taking house and senate. That is what we want right?
|
The lawsuit itself is irrelevant. Injunction is due to a violation of APA (they didn't publish regulations into the Federal Register). They will publish regulations and the lawsuit is moot. Retardicans could sue again, but unless they get extremely lucky - the judge would tell them to fuck off as did the court in DC with the original DACA.
Think of it this way. Your parents die. You and your only sibling are fighting over who should get their car (because its a nice car, let's say a Porsche). You go to court, the lawsuit takes a few months. A tsunami comes and the car is on the bottom of the ocean somewhere, dragging it out and fixing it would exceed its worth, and it'd never be at 100% anyways. The lawsuit regarding it is completely moot then since the subject matter has been destroyed. Same situation here.
__________________
LPR these days
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2Face
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2Face
I hope Trump wins second term.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
|
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IamAman
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/29/politi...awsuit-delays/
I too get the feeling that the 5th circuit which will likely deny lifting the injunction is holding off their decision to make sure the Supereme court doesn't get it in time for June 2016 . |
Post your reply or quote more messages.
__________________
I-821D /I-765 received 9/11/12- Nebraska SC DACA APPROVAL--12/5/12--- EAD---12/5/12
Visa Overstay.. married SameSex USC 7/2013 AOS filed 10/25/13 rcvd 11/1/13 intvw scheduled 1/8/14 Adjusted 1/8/14 GC rcvd 1/16/2014 filed N-400 4/8/2018 Naturalization intvw 12/20/18 passed
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»