• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Mark Meadows: House Freedom Caucus moving to give DACA recipients citizenship - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
#21
05-27-2018, 07:48 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
783 posts
justjohnjustice1988's Avatar
justjohnjustice1988
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
I call BS; there is no such thing as permanent DACA and certainly no line to citizenship through it.

The discharge petition was brought about for USAAct, Dream Act, RAC Act to cover all childhood arrivals.

Fuck the freedom caucus, Meadows and his restrictionist crap. People like his ilk at DHS are already in deep shit for losing 1500 children and abusing families and children. What they really want is to piggyback the failed Farm bill on a successful Dreamer-relief bill.
I feel u man.

But right now we gotta see what the moderate GOP representatives are working on and what they will agree to.

Theres no bill yet and the negotiations are still going on. Im sure Rep. Denham will ask for as much in return on our behalf
__________________
Filing/APP sent: myself/08-18-12 1:00 p.m. Received: 08-21-12 G-1145 Notification: 08-24-12 5:12 p.m.I-797 C Letter: 8-29-12 Bio Appt.: 9-24-12 RFE notice: 11-06-12 (online) 11-10-12 (letter) RFE resp. to USCIS: 11-13-12
EAD in hands:Nov 20!!!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
justjohnjustice1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to justjohnjustice1988
Find all posts by justjohnjustice1988
#22
05-27-2018, 07:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
1,478 posts
dreamer__13's Avatar
dreamer__13
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by freshh. View Post
Exactly.

The Freedom Caucus is going to cave on chain migration and the DV lottery because they want to stay relevant like several other members have mentioned. Making these two items the sticking points will lead to a break down in talks sooner rather than later ensuring the success of the discharge petition. The easiest way out is to eliminate any changes to chain migration and the DV lotto and focus on a DACA + Border Security package.

IMHO, we're going to end up with one of two things (if talks don't fall apart altogether):
1. DACA + Border Wall without a pathway to citizenship meaning we find our own way to citizenship within the current immigration system.
2. DACA + Border Wall with conditional green cards that do not allow us to adjust for 10-12 years. This appeases their base by saying we didn't get any special treatment and they avoided a new wave of DREAMers in the future.
2 wouldn’t be bad tbh.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer__13
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer__13
Find all posts by dreamer__13
#23
05-27-2018, 08:45 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2016
2,718 posts
JayR9
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by freshh. View Post
Exactly.

The Freedom Caucus is going to cave on chain migration and the DV lottery because they want to stay relevant like several other members have mentioned. Making these two items the sticking points will lead to a break down in talks sooner rather than later ensuring the success of the discharge petition. The easiest way out is to eliminate any changes to chain migration and the DV lotto and focus on a DACA + Border Security package.

IMHO, we're going to end up with one of two things (if talks don't fall apart altogether):
1. DACA + Border Wall without a pathway to citizenship meaning we find our own way to citizenship within the current immigration system.
2. DACA + Border Wall with conditional green cards that do not allow us to adjust for 10-12 years. This appeases their base by saying we didn't get any special treatment and they avoided a new wave of DREAMers in the future.
You're giving the FC too much credit if you think they will land anywhere close to those two options.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JayR9
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JayR9
Find all posts by JayR9
#24
05-27-2018, 09:22 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
2,169 posts
jwxie518's Avatar
jwxie518
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayR9 View Post
You're giving the FC too much credit if you think they will land anywhere close to those two options.
Wait to see how things will play out. Who gives a damn fuck if it’s FC or Trump giving us a solution? Legalize me and I am happy. Only SJW would not take 2.
__________________
All I want is to travel freely where I like.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jwxie518
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jwxie518
Find all posts by jwxie518
#25
05-27-2018, 09:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by freshh. View Post
Exactly.

The Freedom Caucus is going to cave on chain migration and the DV lottery because they want to stay relevant like several other members have mentioned. Making these two items the sticking points will lead to a break down in talks sooner rather than later ensuring the success of the discharge petition. The easiest way out is to eliminate any changes to chain migration and the DV lotto and focus on a DACA + Border Security package.

IMHO, we're going to end up with one of two things (if talks don't fall apart altogether):
1. DACA + Border Wall without a pathway to citizenship meaning we find our own way to citizenship within the current immigration system.
2. DACA + Border Wall with conditional green cards that do not allow us to adjust for 10-12 years. This appeases their base by saying we didn't get any special treatment and they avoided a new wave of DREAMers in the future.


1 wouldnt be bad if it leaves everything as it is. But if has any dumb things that fucks it up for the rest of immigrants the no way.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#26
05-27-2018, 09:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
1,544 posts
versailles's Avatar
versailles
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
1 wouldnt be bad if it leaves everything as it is. But if has any dumb things that fucks it up for the rest of immigrants the no way.
define "fuck it up for the rest of immigrants"
__________________
The king has returned.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
versailles
View Public Profile
Send a private message to versailles
Find all posts by versailles
#27
05-27-2018, 10:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
4,996 posts
libertarian1776's Avatar
libertarian1776
0 AP
should include “all childhood arrivals” for people who dont have DACA like dtrt09 and DACA-IR-DA.

so like 3 million plus people aka mini comprehensive immigration reform.

Quote:
Originally Posted by versailles View Post
define "fuck it up for the rest of immigrants"
__________________
initial DACA: 6/2012
2nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
Last edited by libertarian1776; 05-27-2018 at 10:11 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
libertarian1776
View Public Profile
Send a private message to libertarian1776
Find all posts by libertarian1776
#28
05-27-2018, 10:19 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2017
243 posts
RedBlueGreen
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian1776 View Post
should include “all childhood arrivals” for people who dont have DACA like dtrt09 and DACA-IR-DA.

so like 3 million plus people aka mini comprehensive immigration reform.
aka Dead on Arrival. The Freedom Caucus would never agree to legalize 3 million people.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
RedBlueGreen
View Public Profile
Send a private message to RedBlueGreen
Find all posts by RedBlueGreen
#29
05-27-2018, 10:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2017
1,158 posts
BeansDreamtoo21
0 AP
Imagine if republicans pass an immigration bill for us using the nuclear option lul
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
BeansDreamtoo21
View Public Profile
Send a private message to BeansDreamtoo21
Find all posts by BeansDreamtoo21
#30
05-27-2018, 10:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,181 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeansDreamtoo21 View Post
Imagine if republicans pass an immigration bill for us using the nuclear option lul
Ha! In your dreams.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Hawaii (O herro, I rearry rike Honoruru and RuRuRemon 'Wai you so sirry - kiki hehe)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.