• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

February

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

House Dems say Dreamers likely won't be part of deal to avert shutdown - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • next ›
  • last »
#11
01-29-2019, 03:00 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
If they won’t include daca then at least they’re not giving him his wall. It’s a win for everyone but trump to be honest

Daca remains as it is
Democrats don’t take blame for the shutdown
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#12
01-29-2019, 03:03 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
374 posts
always_learner11
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by vft1008 View Post
I'm so confused. So many conflicting statements.

for the group that does not want to include DACA or TPS relief, what will they want? Or is the assumption that they will give border security funding and not border wall funding?
That's exactly right. If the Republicans do not mention GCs, the conference will provide Trump with border security bill without a wall. Any concessions that the Democrats provide in that bill will not be enough for Trump to declare victory but will be enough so that Democrats can say they provided a bill with plenty of border security (again, no wall).

Trump will have no choice but to declare an emergency, which will quickly be shot down in the courts.

It's a win-win situation for Democrats:
A. 5.7B wall money in exchange for GCs
or
B. No deal, Democrats use DREAMers as political pawns in 2020

Democrats, whether you question their motives or not, have no other choice. They can't come to the table and negotiate in earnest because Republicans play dirty and would shift all the blame on DREAMers.

Republicans will decide what happens next. Democrats have no say.
__________________
Sent: 8/14/12 , 1/14/18
Arrived in Chicago: 8/16/12 , 1/16/18
Confirmation Text: 8/20/12 , 1/18/18
I-797C: 8/24/12 , 1/22/18
Biometrics: 9/12/12 , 2/14/18
Approved: 9/26
EAD Arrived: 9/29
Expire: 8/7/18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
always_learner11
View Public Profile
Send a private message to always_learner11
Find all posts by always_learner11
#13
01-29-2019, 03:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by always_learner11 View Post
That's exactly right. If the Republicans do not mention GCs, the conference will provide Trump with border security bill without a wall. Any concessions that the Democrats provide in that bill will not be enough for Trump to declare victory but will be enough so that Democrats can say they provided a bill with plenty of border security (again, no wall).

Trump will have no choice but to declare an emergency, which will quickly be shot down in the courts.

It's a win-win situation for Democrats:
A. 5.7B wall money in exchange for GCs
or
B. No deal, Democrats use DREAMers as political pawns in 2020

Democrats, whether you question their motives or not, have no other choice. They can't come to the table and negotiate in earnest because Republicans play dirty and would shift all the blame on DREAMers.

Republicans will decide what happens next. Democrats have no say.
agreed.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#14
01-29-2019, 03:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
The problem is Trump any other Republicans President would give us a permanent path


But then again


It was trump who cause this shutdown and as a result we might get something out of it. Or at least keep what we already have and maybe have AP back
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#15
01-29-2019, 03:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
The problem is Trump any other Republicans President would give us a permanent path


But then again


It was trump who cause this shutdown and as a result we might get something out of it. Or at least keep what we already have and maybe have AP back
Let's just hope he gets desperate enough.

I think he knows that he won't win if he declares a national emergency. A fair narrow deal is the only way, and he has to be the one to offer it.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#16
01-29-2019, 03:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2016
2,683 posts
jaylove16
0 AP
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), however, suggested Tuesday that Republicans would support a final agreement that included a legal fix for the tens of thousands of Dreamers who could face deportation.

“Having the House and Senate there, whatever it takes to solve the problem,” McCarthy said. “If there is a concern on common ground, why couldn’t both sides come together?”

Well push for it then McCarty .
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
jaylove16
View Public Profile
Send a private message to jaylove16
Find all posts by jaylove16
#17
01-29-2019, 03:25 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
1,153 posts
catportal's Avatar
catportal
0 AP
Let me give you guys the game theory behind the Dems, related to 2020 msging:

Preference #1
No wall money, Trump capitulates and does NOT go through with nat emergency.
- this is best for Dems, they get to say they fully stopped Trump and kept gov open

Preference #2
No wall money, Trump does nat emergency
- Dems will say wall is tied up in courts and they didn't cave, thereby still stopping Trump.

Preference #3
Wall money + perm status deal that MUST start from the WH, Dems can't counter offer perm status first no matter what. This is why Hoyer is saying it is not part of the deal. It also allows them to do some show votes in the house passing Dream Act and it will never be seen/heard from the Senate.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
catportal
View Public Profile
Send a private message to catportal
Find all posts by catportal
#18
01-29-2019, 03:25 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaylove16 View Post
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), however, suggested Tuesday that Republicans would support a final agreement that included a legal fix for the tens of thousands of Dreamers who could face deportation.

“Having the House and Senate there, whatever it takes to solve the problem,” McCarthy said. “If there is a concern on common ground, why couldn’t both sides come together?”

Well push for it then McCarty .
Agree with you.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#19
01-29-2019, 03:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2018
364 posts
Dreamer1980
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
Dems are playing hardball. They want Trump too offer a good deal. As soon as they start mentioning Daca, his bitch ass starts demanding too much.
100%
By now we know Trump is not a master negotiator, he just makes demands but definetly not a master of the "Art of War"

We all have seen the concesions the Reps are willing to negotiate on ... 3 year permits, they never want the dreamers to have voting rights because they can only have aoubt 20% of the votes outthere and every vote counts. They know that after all the fuckery they have done to hispanics the vast majority will never vote for them, and thus they aren't interested on giving any concesions that will decrease their vote counts even if it is 12 years into the future.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dreamer1980
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dreamer1980
Find all posts by Dreamer1980
#20
01-29-2019, 03:27 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2018
364 posts
Dreamer1980
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smooth View Post
Agree with you.
the real fix is 1.8 million plus Dreamers not 10s of thousands (sneaky fucks)... what he is referring to is water down Bridge Act, in other words waterdown shit.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dreamer1980
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dreamer1980
Find all posts by Dreamer1980
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.