• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

JUST IN: Texas AG Ken Paxton asks federal judge to declare DACA illegal and stop feds - Page 8

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • next ›
  • last »
#71
02-04-2019, 11:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,675 posts
TexasDreamy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by isk84life View Post
In the meantime, the lower courts rule. Immigration lawyer Leon Fresco told VOA in May that multiple cases about the same issue is "not very common."

But as long as even one of them, much less several, keeps DACA running, it is good to go.

"So long as even one nationwide injunction is in place, DACA continues to operate," Fresco said. "Only the Supreme Court can wipe the slate clean here."

https://www.voanews.com/a/us-supreme...-/4772317.html
That only applies if the same issue is under consideration in multiple courts. Each court is dealing with a different issue:

9th circuit: Rescission
2nd circuit: Also hearing arguments about rescission
DC courts: Also about rescission
5th circuit: Haha fuck you guys, DACA was never legal to begin with
__________________
Renewal 3: Card: Jun/19
Awaiting GC/USC...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexasDreamy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexasDreamy
Find all posts by TexasDreamy
#72
02-04-2019, 11:38 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Jun 2015
13 posts
Imworried
0 AP
I expire the end of June and I’m sending mines in this week. I’m praying I get just one more. I just want to live man that’s all. My life is filled with anxiety and fear. Why can’t they just leave us alone
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Imworried
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Imworried
Find all posts by Imworried
#73
02-04-2019, 11:42 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,675 posts
TexasDreamy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imworried View Post
I expire the end of June and I’m sending mines in this week. I’m praying I get just one more. I just want to live man that’s all. My life is filled with anxiety and fear. Why can’t they just leave us alone
Welcome to the club, bro
__________________
Renewal 3: Card: Jun/19
Awaiting GC/USC...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexasDreamy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexasDreamy
Find all posts by TexasDreamy
#74
02-04-2019, 11:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,720 posts
isk84life
0 AP
I expire August. Might be able to sneak in a last renewal in early March... tired of both parties using us. Maybe a ruling by Hansen ending the program will finally get politicians to start finding a solution.
__________________
Human-Computer Interaction Engineering MS
Senior User Experience Designer @ Facebook
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
isk84life
View Public Profile
Send a private message to isk84life
Find all posts by isk84life
#75
02-04-2019, 11:50 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2018
651 posts
cmeow
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by isk84life View Post
I expire August. Might be able to sneak in a last renewal in early March... tired of both parties using us. Maybe a ruling by Hansen ending the program will finally get politicians to start finding a solution.
I'm pretty sure ending the program is the solution for republicans.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
cmeow
View Public Profile
Send a private message to cmeow
Find all posts by cmeow
#76
02-04-2019, 11:50 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal, USA
Joined in Sep 2016
2,994 posts
vft1008's Avatar
vft1008
0 AP
I hope Paxton visits versailles and personally confiscates his EAD.
__________________
Newsom 2028!
Yes on CA Prop 50 during the Nov, 2025 special election! Fuck TX's redistricting and gerrymandering.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
vft1008
View Public Profile
Send a private message to vft1008
Find all posts by vft1008
#77
02-04-2019, 11:52 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2007
661 posts
tays123
0 AP
Why are we even discussing this "again"? They do not have the same case as they did with eDACA and DAPA. They would have gone through that route for the original DACA way back then. The original DACA was put in place properly. So stop freaking people out for no reason.



Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasDreamy View Post
All the other courts are considering the issue whether or not DACA was properly withdrawn.

This specific lawsuit is about whether or not DACA was legal to begin with in the first place.

If Hanen issues a summary judgment in favor of Texas, then the issues considered by the other courts become moot since they target a more "senior" issue.

There are actually a few more avenues that this case could take:

1) Hanen issues summary judgment; renewals cancelled and everyone slowly expires over the next 2 years.

2) Hanen issues summary judgment; renewals allowed, but everyone expires on the same date in 2021

3) Hanen declines summary judgment; case moves to trial

4) Hanen issues summary judgment (1) or (2), but stays any outcome pending an appeal; the case moves to appeals court in six months and the appeals court refuses to hear the appeal to the summary judgment/stay lifted/everyone slowly expires?; defense appeals to the supreme court in 2020, SCOTUS declines to hear the case, final nail in the DACA coffin
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tays123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tays123
Find all posts by tays123
#78
02-04-2019, 11:56 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
1,478 posts
dreamer__13's Avatar
dreamer__13
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmeow View Post
I'm pretty sure ending the program is the solution for republicans.
LMFAOOOOOOO... you’re not fucking lying.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer__13
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer__13
Find all posts by dreamer__13
#79
02-04-2019, 11:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2017
1,478 posts
dreamer__13's Avatar
dreamer__13
0 AP
Anyone else not give a fuck anymore??
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer__13
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer__13
Find all posts by dreamer__13
#80
02-04-2019, 11:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,675 posts
TexasDreamy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by tays123 View Post
Why are we even discussing this "again"? They do not have the same case as they did with eDACA and DAPA. They would have gone through that route for the original DACA way back then. The original DACA was put in place properly. So stop freaking people out for no reason.
Have you read the filing? It's pretty well written and outlines like a 20-prong attack on DACA. The court really only has to find one of them to be sufficiently non-debatable to issue a summary judgment against DACA.
__________________
Renewal 3: Card: Jun/19
Awaiting GC/USC...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexasDreamy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexasDreamy
Find all posts by TexasDreamy
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.