Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewing"

Maybe an expedited shutting down of DACA is the last hope Congress will have to do something. Again, maybe.

Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court issue the following relief
regarding the Final Rule:
A. An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewing
any DACA permits in the future under the Final Rule;
B. An order vacating the Final Rule as substantively unlawful and
unconstitutional, and arbitrary and capricious under the APA;
C. A declaratory judgment that the Final Rule is substantively unlawful
under the APA;
D. A declaratory judgment that the Final Rule violates the Take Care
Clause;
E. A declaratory judgment that the Final Rule is arbitrary and capricious;
F. Any and all other relief to which Plaintiffs may be entitled.

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov...0Complaint.pdf

Full news release from Paxton's website:

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov...al-immigration

First of all, do we qualify for receive taxpayer-funded benefits such as Social Security and Medicare???

Second of all, there are 2 or 3 pending cases against Paxton, when are they going to get around to finally indicting him?

Third, the judge will look at the basis for the request or the immediate need. Since daca has been around for 10 years, it's safe to say there is no need to immediately stop daca since no harm is being done.

no rest for the wicked.

No. You'd need to either be an LPR for 5 years, otherwise qualified for at least 5 years (e.g. have an approved VAWA or at least a prima facie determination from one, asylum, refugee status), or you must've entered before some date in 1996.

They want to give us a Christmas gift of love.

The grinch. Deported by christmas. ��

This is 100% incorrect. Approval for Social Security benefits does not actually require LPR or citizenship, and a valid legal status is only required for the actual distribution of benefits. In fact, it is not even that lawful status allows for the benefts to be processed, but the fact that lack of lawful status is one of the disqualifying criteria, per RS 00204.010 Lawful Presence Payment Provisions, which clearly denotes that: "IMPORTANT: The lawful presence/citizenship requirements are factors affecting payment of benefits, but they are NOT factors of entitlement."

There are over 20 totalization agreements currently in effect between the US and other countries, which allow individuals to more-or-less combine any accumulated social security credits acquired in either country. As of the Social Security Act of 2004, more specifically Section 211 of the SSPA, the primary requirement is a valid, work-permitting social security number associated with accumulated credits, which all DACA recipients were able to obtain through approval of I-765. However, the US government will not process the first payment until one either proves their legal status while present in the US, or leaves the United States and shows up at the consulate in the native country to complete the processing.

So ice gets its funding and immigrants that have built a life here get the after thought. Dems and Republicans are both full of shit.