DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

GOP lawmakers seek to halt immigration reform push - Page 2

#11
04-26-2010, 02:39 AM
Member
Joined in Nov 2009
35 posts
jin5587
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
Family sponsorship should be gone. Canada has a system based on education and skills.
And Canada also has family sponsorship, too.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#12
04-26-2010, 03:12 AM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
family sponsorship needs to go
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#13
04-26-2010, 05:28 AM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonawabich View Post
family sponsorship needs to go
They'll never completely get rid of family sponsorship. Because people will still want to legally bring their spouses and children to the U.S. IMO, they'll probably allow direct relatives like your parents, spouse and dependent children under 21. And they have to do something about these horrendous wait times. I mean people are waiting 20 years to immigrate from the Philippines. By the time a family's case comes up their kids are all over 21.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#14
04-26-2010, 07:31 AM
Senior Member
From California
Joined in Jan 2009
1,438 posts
Dreamer X's Avatar
Dreamer X
0 AP
The GOP will say no to everything...
__________________
"I shall seize Fate by the throat; it shall certainly not bend and crush me completely" -Ludwig von Beethoven
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#15
04-26-2010, 07:55 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by jin5587 View Post
And Canada also has family sponsorship, too.
True. Maybe keep both? It just does not make sense to bring in people just because of connections.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#16
04-26-2010, 09:11 PM
Senior Member
From Georgia
Joined in Nov 2009
422 posts
Jelly Bean Lover's Avatar
Jelly Bean Lover
120 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamer X View Post
The GOP will say no to everything...
Lol. They just said no to financial reform and regulation a few hours ago.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#17
04-26-2010, 10:24 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
CIR has always had bi-partisan support.
Post your reply or quote more messages.


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.