• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Tough Prospects for DREAM Act’s Lame Duck Passage - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
#11
11-12-2010, 04:47 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
2,582 posts
Ali
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by sashadreamer View Post
politicians don't read LOL

they claim they have to "look it over very closely". WHAT IS THERE TO LOOK AT! it's clear as day, in my opinion.

but yea, the book idea is, in fact, a great idea, kind of like "Chicken Soup for the Soul", except with more of a political outlook.
In before the leg humpers!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ali
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ali
Find all posts by Ali
#12
11-12-2010, 08:32 PM
Moderator
From Illinois/Florida
Joined in Jul 2009
2,219 posts
buckminsterfullerene's Avatar
buckminsterfullerene
270 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeGuy_ View Post
It looks like the Lame Duck session will be dominated by the Bush Tax cuts. Perhaps, if Reid attached the Dream Act to a bill granting tax cuts to the rich, then we will have Republican support.
I don't know, I just heard Senator Susan Collins on C-Span2, she was talking a lot of stuff, but she mentioned the vote of no on the DoD bill despite having DADT which she had sponsored in the past and DA which she supported, she voted no because she claimed she did not like how they brought it up, and also referenced to the possibility of a group uniting in order to prevent democrat leadership from adding amendments and not allowing republicans from discussing those amendments before taking the bills to vote.

She was considered as being one of 6 potential female presidential nominees and called herself a moderate republican. All I heard was that she let down a bill that she had sponsored in the past and a bill that she approved of in order to make a point, and that worries me about attaching this to anything.

Those tactics did not work with the DoD, it might not work if it is attached to another bill for the same reason, because we might just give the republicans the ability to approve of the DA bill but filibuster the passage of another important bill which has the DA attached and give them an excuse to feed the public while claiming their support of the DA and trying to get the latino vote that way.

I really really hope that reid has all the democratic votes, if he does then the all the republicans will not be able to vote no on the DA and later on feed BS to the public about how they support the DA in order to try and get the latino vote.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
buckminsterfullerene
View Public Profile
Send a private message to buckminsterfullerene
Find all posts by buckminsterfullerene
#13
11-12-2010, 09:09 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
728 posts
hgr1915
0 AP
I think he'll do it as a stand alone bill.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hgr1915
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hgr1915
Find all posts by hgr1915
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.