• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

A Bipartisan Tweak to Reduce the Immigration Reform Backlog - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
#11
12-03-2011, 05:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by swordfish View Post
Dream Act also benefit only one group of the undocumented population. The real solution would be CIR but unfortunately that is not on the table as right now.
And I absolutely agree with you. I have nothing against legal immigrants from China and India. The thing that frustrates me is that Democrats are going along with GOP piecemeal legisation intended to fix some aspects of the broken immigration system when they know that CIR is needed. Just like the GOP has stiffed Democrats on the DA for being a piecemeal solution, Democrats should do the same with this bill and push for CIR.

Moreover, note that piecemeal solutions just further limit or narrow the grounds for compromise on CIR, hurting its prospects for future passage. If this bill passes and the GOP manages to convince Democrats to secure the border first and pass E-verify, what will Democrats do to bring the GOP to the table to compromise over what to do with the undocumented immigrants who are already here?
Last edited by Smooth; 12-03-2011 at 05:24 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#12
12-03-2011, 05:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
I wonder if Democrats in the Senate will try something with the DA and this bill?

There was an article released earlier this year that Democrats in the Senate considered combining the DA with the McCain-Kyl border security bill. I don't know. There is just so much room for speculation.

But again, CIR is desperately needed.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#13
12-05-2011, 03:01 AM
Member
From New York
Joined in Jul 2011
91 posts
QVictoria
0 AP
Occupy Dreamers.....occupy Dreamers....occupy Dreamers.....spread The Word....occupy Dreamers!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
QVictoria
View Public Profile
Send a private message to QVictoria
Find all posts by QVictoria
#14
12-05-2011, 04:20 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
828 posts
Alex QA's Avatar
Alex QA
0 AP
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is placing a hold on the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act (H.R. 3012) that overwhelmingly passed through the House Tuesday night 389-to-15.
However, Sen. Grassley, who serves as the Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is concerned that the bill could have an impact on future immigration numbers as well as the impact it could have for highly-skilled unemployed Americans currently looking for work.

The following is the statement Sen. Grassley is providing for the Congressional record:

"I rise to inform my colleagues that I am placing a hold on H.R. 3012, the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act. This bill would eliminate the per-country numerical limitations for employment and family-based immigrants. I have concerns about the impact of this bill on future immigration flows, and am concerned that it does nothing to better protect Americans at home who seek high-skilled jobs during this time of record high unemployment."

The bill's author, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), opposes the hold, stating, "While per-country limits make some limited sense in the area of family immigration, they make no sense in the context of employment-based immigration. American companies treat all highly skilled immigrants equally regardless of where they come from, and our immigration policy should do the same. The hold should be lifted and the Senate should swiftly pass this bipartisan legislation."

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/n...visa-bill.html

Grassley is such a dick, goes to show how these racist GOP members think
__________________
*Date Application Sent - 8/27/12
*Date Application Delivered - 8/28/12 USPS EXPRESS (Vermont center)
Acceptance Notice - 08/31/12
I-797 - 09/04/12 || Biometrics Date - 10/04/12 (walk in 9/12/12)

EAD Approved: 9/21/12 || EAD received: 09/27/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Alex QA
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Alex QA
Find all posts by Alex QA
#15
12-05-2011, 02:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex QA View Post
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is placing a hold on the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act (H.R. 3012) that overwhelmingly passed through the House Tuesday night 389-to-15.
However, Sen. Grassley, who serves as the Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is concerned that the bill could have an impact on future immigration numbers as well as the impact it could have for highly-skilled unemployed Americans currently looking for work.

The following is the statement Sen. Grassley is providing for the Congressional record:

"I rise to inform my colleagues that I am placing a hold on H.R. 3012, the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act. This bill would eliminate the per-country numerical limitations for employment and family-based immigrants. I have concerns about the impact of this bill on future immigration flows, and am concerned that it does nothing to better protect Americans at home who seek high-skilled jobs during this time of record high unemployment."

The bill's author, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), opposes the hold, stating, "While per-country limits make some limited sense in the area of family immigration, they make no sense in the context of employment-based immigration. American companies treat all highly skilled immigrants equally regardless of where they come from, and our immigration policy should do the same. The hold should be lifted and the Senate should swiftly pass this bipartisan legislation."

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/n...visa-bill.html

Grassley is such a dick, goes to show how these racist GOP members think
hahahahahha The GOP.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
#16
01-01-2012, 02:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,204 posts
CB124
20 AP
so what happened with this? Anything?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CB124
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CB124
Find all posts by CB124
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.