• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

REALLY Great Immigration News! You guys are gonna love this! - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • next ›
  • last »
#11
01-06-2012, 10:19 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
329 posts
swordfish
0 AP
This will only benefit people who is not protected under 245i, it doesn't change the current waiting period for a visa that in some cases can take up to 20 years (mexicans, filipinos & indians)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
swordfish
View Public Profile
Send a private message to swordfish
Find all posts by swordfish
#12
01-06-2012, 11:33 AM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
This change I think would mainly affect those at Immigrate2us.net considering the I-601 process can be done on US soil as this rule proposes.I'm assuming the adjustment interview would also be done on US soil for EWIs who meet the requirements.
Quote:
Originally Posted by swordfish View Post
This will only benefit people who is not protected under 245i, it doesn't change the current waiting period for a visa that in some cases can take up to 20 years (mexicans, filipinos & indians)
Of course not,that is all due to the quota system which although maybe a detriment to some it does make sense to have an equal immigration inflow.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#13
01-06-2012, 11:41 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,204 posts
CB124
20 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by swordfish View Post
This will only benefit people who is not protected under 245i, it doesn't change the current waiting period for a visa that in some cases can take up to 20 years (mexicans, filipinos & indians)
The numbers on the quota can only be changed by congress, the administration can't magically make numbers allowed to adjust increase. They can make it easier to adjust, which is what they did. I thought that was pretty obvious.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CB124
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CB124
Find all posts by CB124
#14
01-06-2012, 12:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2010
174 posts
Oskieo
0 AP
dont get ur hopes up,sorry!! extreme hardship is the key phrase!! until i see results ill be jumping for joy ....ya digg
__________________
Bio-9/20
Nebraska SC
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Oskieo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Oskieo
Find all posts by Oskieo
#15
01-06-2012, 12:58 PM
Member
Joined in Aug 2009
64 posts
sephlan
0 AP
So this is only good news for those who have a USC relative?
Whoopie!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
sephlan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sephlan
Find all posts by sephlan
#16
01-06-2012, 01:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2011
1,424 posts
tyler129
0 AP
So you either have to be married to a USC citizen or qualify under "extreme hardship" to get 10 year ban waived? that's bullsh*t.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
tyler129
View Public Profile
Send a private message to tyler129
Find all posts by tyler129
#17
01-06-2012, 01:07 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,110 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
"U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) intends to change its current process for filing and adjudication of certain applications for waivers of inadmissibility filed in connection with an immediate relative immigrant visa application. Specifically, USCIS is considering regulatory changes that will allow certain immediate relatives of U.S. citizens to request provisional waivers under section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (INA or Act), 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), prior to departing the United States for consular processing of their immigrant visa applications."

http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/...p-a-uscis.aspx
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#18
01-06-2012, 01:15 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
329 posts
swordfish
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB124 View Post
The numbers on the quota can only be changed by congress, the administration can't magically make numbers allowed to adjust increase. They can make it easier to adjust, which is what they did. I thought that was pretty obvious.
Any law changes need congress approval, so I don't think the president will be able to make a back door extention of the section 245i. After all that is what he trying to do.
All this is just political game to gain some points with the immigration community.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
swordfish
View Public Profile
Send a private message to swordfish
Find all posts by swordfish
#19
01-06-2012, 01:40 PM
Senior Member
From texas
Joined in Jan 2010
586 posts
NoWhereToRun's Avatar
NoWhereToRun
0 AP
something concrete would be nice...this way he is just creating animosity. Would be nice if he introduced something for CIR and the answer would be Yes or No.. feel like he is toying with us.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
NoWhereToRun
View Public Profile
Send a private message to NoWhereToRun
Find all posts by NoWhereToRun
#20
01-06-2012, 02:23 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAman View Post
No, if the child is a USC, then the parent is considered immediate family and can get their green card without waiting (well, like 6 months), BUT if the parents are USC and the child is over 21, he's not immediate family. I think it's F2 catagory...Better than F4 mind you but it'd still take a good 6 years.
Right so this new rule does not help the child over 21 and the parent is a USC?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • next ›
  • last »


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.