• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

February

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Obama Sets Monday Deadline for Appealing Immigration Order - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
#11
03-05-2015, 07:50 PM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
So next Monday it is for something to happen for DACA Expansion.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
#12
03-05-2015, 09:36 PM
Member
Joined in Mar 2015
67 posts
collins22
0 AP
From Reuters
The administration asked Hanen for a stay on his order last month and late on Wednesday requested a decision by Monday.

Hanen on Thursday declined to comment while the case is ongoing.

Hanen, who had previously criticized U.S. immigration enforcement as too lax, based his ruling on an administrative law question, faulting Obama for not giving public notice of his plans. He also cited ways that Texas would be harmed by the action but used no other states as examples.

Anne O'Connell, a professor at University of California Berkeley School of Law, said it is doubtful that Hanen will grant even the partial stay, but said the administration's move appears designed to force Hanen to defend his argument.

"If all the harm is about Texas, it does seem like a bit of overreaching by the judge to keep the preliminary injunction in place everywhere," O'Connell said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0M12NF20150305
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
collins22
View Public Profile
Send a private message to collins22
Find all posts by collins22
#13
03-05-2015, 09:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2015
233 posts
yummy11226
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by freshh. View Post
If that happens, it means my family and many others will be moving to states that are more immigrant friendly, which will benefit those states financially. I still cannot believe they tried to say the states are burdened by driver licenses we pay for. I just find it unfair that people have to uproot their lives and families where many have been for years.
At this point it's better than nothing and its a compromose worth having. By doing this he's forcing their hands because the Republicans will have to answer to those states that are not a part of it come election time. I too will never understand the "burden" Hanen said would be inflicted on these states especially when we're essentially (over)paying our damn selves. Not to mention the billions they instantly obtained when they implemented ID cards and driver's licenses by mandating we had to pay two years of back taxes. I personally had to pay four thousand dollars in back taxes before i could apply for those cards when those cards had a blatant "Not for Federal purposes " stamped on the front like a fuckin' scarlet letter. To turn around and say that obtaining some modicum of dignity would be a "burden" on their states when in actuality it would essentially help them is really a slap in the face.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
yummy11226
View Public Profile
Send a private message to yummy11226
Find all posts by yummy11226
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.