• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Father of 5, denied re-entry during immigration interview - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
#11
07-30-2017, 01:42 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,656 posts
dado123
0 AP
How would immigration know about the trip ? I assume he flew to Mexico and came back with out inspection? Does immigration have access to plane records?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#12
07-30-2017, 01:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
5,411 posts
JohannBernoulli1667's Avatar
JohannBernoulli1667
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
How would immigration know about the trip ? I assume he flew to Mexico and came back with out inspection? Does immigration have access to plane records?
They do, around that time, the early 2000s CBP matched I94 data to passager information I believe. Just like today, it is an automatic process.

Regardless he was EWI from the start hence he had to go back, even with the lie. Also, it is possible that consular processing has access to Mexican databases and records. That is how they screen incoming visitors etc..
__________________
"The world is my country, science my religion"- Constantine Huygens
Last edited by JohannBernoulli1667; 07-30-2017 at 03:06 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JohannBernoulli1667
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JohannBernoulli1667
Find all posts by JohannBernoulli1667
#13
07-30-2017, 07:11 PM
BANNED
Joined in Jun 2017
3,091 posts
BeeHive
0 AP
Does anyone know the lawyers name or firm?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
BeeHive
View Public Profile
Find all posts by BeeHive
#14
07-30-2017, 07:52 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2008
729 posts
legendver2
0 AP
Was his second return to the US an EWI? If he came via airline, he should've been inspected right? Is it even possible to get an EWi when coming via airline?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
legendver2
View Public Profile
Send a private message to legendver2
Find all posts by legendver2
#15
07-30-2017, 08:16 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
5,411 posts
JohannBernoulli1667's Avatar
JohannBernoulli1667
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by legendver2 View Post
Was his second return to the US an EWI? If he came via airline, he should've been inspected right? Is it even possible to get an EWi when coming via airline?
No, if he had been inspected coming the second time, then he would have been able to adjust without leaving.

Even if he had no papers..
__________________
"The world is my country, science my religion"- Constantine Huygens
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JohannBernoulli1667
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JohannBernoulli1667
Find all posts by JohannBernoulli1667
#16
07-30-2017, 08:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2015
5,262 posts
Got_Daca's Avatar
Got_Daca
0 AP
What a shit lawyer
__________________
"Dreamers can't take the center stage" -Weak Dems

"Dreamers should feel safe" -Trump
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Got_Daca
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Got_Daca
Find all posts by Got_Daca
#17
07-31-2017, 10:27 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Dec 2016
4 posts
albertoM
0 AP
Im in the process of filing my I-130 through my LPR mother, so i think i know what happened here.

If you stay in the US unlawfully for over 180 days, you get 3 years ban; 1 year or more, you get 10 yr ban.; leave the USA and enter again unlawfully, no matter the time period, then you get the permanent ban. I think the lawyer thought there were no records of his client's second entry and decided to omit it to qualify for I-601A, (Application for Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver). With the I-601A approved, this man left the US, but even with the waiver they can deny you entry for any other reasons they find, this one being his second entry.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
albertoM
View Public Profile
Send a private message to albertoM
Find all posts by albertoM
#18
07-31-2017, 10:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
5,411 posts
JohannBernoulli1667's Avatar
JohannBernoulli1667
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by albertoM View Post
Im in the process of filing my I-130 through my LPR mother, so i think i know what happened here.

If you stay in the US unlawfully for over 180 days, you get 3 years ban; 1 year or more, you get 10 yr ban.; leave the USA and enter again unlawfully, no matter the time period, then you get the permanent ban. I think the lawyer thought there were no records of his client's second entry and decided to omit it to qualify for I-601A, (Application for Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver). With the I-601A approved, this man left the US, but even with the waiver they can deny you entry for any other reasons they find, this one being his second entry.
I see, this makes sense... That sucks.
__________________
"The world is my country, science my religion"- Constantine Huygens
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JohannBernoulli1667
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JohannBernoulli1667
Find all posts by JohannBernoulli1667
#19
07-31-2017, 10:36 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
5,411 posts
JohannBernoulli1667's Avatar
JohannBernoulli1667
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohannBernoulli1667 View Post
I see, this makes sense... That sucks.
Although are you sure? I thought the permanent ban applies only if you get caught entering and you attempt to enter again after being officially removed.
__________________
"The world is my country, science my religion"- Constantine Huygens
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
JohannBernoulli1667
View Public Profile
Send a private message to JohannBernoulli1667
Find all posts by JohannBernoulli1667
#20
07-31-2017, 10:49 PM
Junior Member
Joined in Dec 2016
4 posts
albertoM
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohannBernoulli1667 View Post
Although are you sure? I thought the permanent ban applies only if you get caught entering and you attempt to enter again after being officially removed.
Thats what i know from here https://www.uscitizenship.info/artic...l%3Fp=299.html

"People who spent a total of one years unlawful time in the US or are ordered deported can be barred permanently. When such persons leave and return or attempt to return to the US illegally without a visa or other valid permission, they are permanently inadmissible to the US."

So he filed that he entered on 1998,reentered in 2003, so his stay qualifies him for the permanent ban.
Last edited by albertoM; 07-31-2017 at 10:52 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
albertoM
View Public Profile
Send a private message to albertoM
Find all posts by albertoM
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.