• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Fox News: Senate awaits ruling on Dem plan to pass immigration in reconciliation - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
#11
09-16-2021, 07:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,178 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacvbo View Post
I read about it yesterday. Even Durbin confirmed this could take weeks. She has to analyze everything included on the bill, not just the legalization of 8 million people. At the end, we will most likely hear what will stay and what will go. My hope is that at least she minimizes this to just us dreamers.
So she’s giving a decision on the whole thing instead of just making a decision on immigration?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Hawaii (O herro, I rearry rike Honoruru and RuRuRemon 'Wai you so sirry - kiki hehe)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
#12
09-16-2021, 08:19 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
124 posts
ralsingh
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CUSenior View Post
So she’s giving a decision on the whole thing instead of just making a decision on immigration?
As much as we would like the bill to AT LEAST contain legalization for Dreamers, I can't see how "less" is better in this case. In budget reconciliation, providing legalization EN MASSE to millions would probably be more effective in convincing the parliamentarian that the immigration provision is added primarily to impact the economy and federal budget.

It seems to me that it's more about whether she would agree to both (1) legalizing the undocumented, and (2) greencard backlogs for the documented. I don't think there will be any further drilling down that these two options.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ralsingh
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ralsingh
Find all posts by ralsingh
#13
09-16-2021, 10:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2007
1,092 posts
txgirl
0 AP
Once this makes its rounds in the news and since title 42 was shut down today… doesn’t look like we will get the answer we want from the parliamentarian.

https://twitter.com/billfoxla/status...493378562?s=21
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
txgirl
View Public Profile
Send a private message to txgirl
Find all posts by txgirl
#14
09-16-2021, 10:29 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2014
4,804 posts
2MoreYears's Avatar
2MoreYears
0 AP
Holy crap that a lot of ppl.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2MoreYears
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2MoreYears
Find all posts by 2MoreYears
#15
09-16-2021, 11:55 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,238 posts
hDreamer1988
0 AP
Perfect time, give the GOP even more ammo to slam out cause.. Anytime time is a chance at legalization, this happens, and we get f-ed on fox and in the new media.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hDreamer1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hDreamer1988
Find all posts by hDreamer1988
#16
09-17-2021, 12:35 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,178 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralsingh View Post
As much as we would like the bill to AT LEAST contain legalization for Dreamers, I can't see how "less" is better in this case. In budget reconciliation, providing legalization EN MASSE to millions would probably be more effective in convincing the parliamentarian that the immigration provision is added primarily to impact the economy and federal budget.

It seems to me that it's more about whether she would agree to both (1) legalizing the undocumented, and (2) greencard backlogs for the documented. I don't think there will be any further drilling down that these two options.

I think you might have misunderstood me. I just wanted to know if she was just making a decision on immigration or if she was gonna make it on immigration or other things too like climate and other things.

Quote:
Originally Posted by txgirl View Post
Once this makes its rounds in the news and since title 42 was shut down today… doesn’t look like we will get the answer we want from the parliamentarian.

https://twitter.com/billfoxla/status...493378562?s=21
The parliamentarian is apolitical. I doubt that this is gonna affect her decision.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Hawaii (O herro, I rearry rike Honoruru and RuRuRemon 'Wai you so sirry - kiki hehe)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
#17
09-17-2021, 12:48 AM
Member
Joined in Sep 2017
48 posts
Blackfyre
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by AleiaTheEnchanted View Post
When will we hear about her decision? Any guess?
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgirl View Post
Once this makes its rounds in the news and since title 42 was shut down today… doesn’t look like we will get the answer we want from the parliamentarian.

https://twitter.com/billfoxla/status...493378562?s=21
Didn't realize one of the Byrd rules was "must be politically convenient"
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Blackfyre
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Blackfyre
Find all posts by Blackfyre
#18
09-17-2021, 03:17 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2007
279 posts
skysla
20 AP
If the Democrats and Republicans were negotiating a deal for an immigration reform, such an event would affect the whole negotiation process because there is no doubt the Republicans would say "Look at this crisis. We can't do this right now. Pause this now.", which is precisely what they did earlier this year. It's their typical thing to do.

But, this whole process does not involve any Republican. It will all come down to how open-minded the parliamentarian is and how she interprets the Byrd rules for the immigration provisions after the Democrats' argument for including them in reconciliation.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
skysla
View Public Profile
Send a private message to skysla
Find all posts by skysla
#19
09-17-2021, 09:11 AM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,457 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CUSenior View Post
I think you might have misunderstood me. I just wanted to know if she was just making a decision on immigration or if she was gonna make it on immigration or other things too like climate and other things.



The parliamentarian is apolitical. I doubt that this is gonna affect her decision.
Every provision in the Reconciliation bill must satisfy the Bryd Rule. So yes that includes other things than immigration. I don't know if she will announce it all at once - what passed the Byrd Rule or as she decides each section separately.
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#20
09-17-2021, 09:34 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
124 posts
ralsingh
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swim19 View Post
Every provision in the Reconciliation bill must satisfy the Bryd Rule. So yes that includes other things than immigration. I don't know if she will announce it all at once - what passed the Byrd Rule or as she decides each section separately.
Just to add, Byrd Rule is NOT self-enforcing. A senator has to raise a point of order before a provision can be considered for Byrd Rule.

Most likely, Republicans will raise a point of order for immigration and climate change.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
ralsingh
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ralsingh
Find all posts by ralsingh
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.