• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

October

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

New Trump Daca tweet - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#21
12-29-2017, 12:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
742 posts
NotADreamerPerSe
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MoreYears View Post
I'm ok with allowing parents. No siblings. No Children 18+.
You may be ok with that, but US CITIZENS who want to sponsor family members won't.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
NotADreamerPerSe
View Public Profile
Send a private message to NotADreamerPerSe
Find all posts by NotADreamerPerSe
#22
12-29-2017, 02:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
1,153 posts
catportal's Avatar
catportal
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl_dreamer View Post
I don’t know why everyone is pissing over end of chain migration. Spouses and children will still be allowed. This is just to end sponsorship for parents, siblings, etc.

If we don’t become legal, our parents won’t get legalized through us anyway. Saying no to end of chain migration is a loose loose on both ends.
The point is chain migration isn't an issue. No need for Dems to cave on stupid premises when they can just force feed what they want using the shutdown as leverage.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
catportal
View Public Profile
Send a private message to catportal
Find all posts by catportal
#23
12-29-2017, 02:29 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
549 posts
Alfredo93's Avatar
Alfredo93
0 AP
He knows what e-verify is. Hes demanded it before. The corporations dont want it and he knows it would be a HUGE blow to the American economy.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Alfredo93
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Alfredo93
Find all posts by Alfredo93
#24
12-29-2017, 02:48 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
3,098 posts
fl_dreamer
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by catportal View Post
The point is chain migration isn't an issue. No need for Dems to cave on stupid premises when they can just force feed what they want using the shutdown as leverage.
People like you is why we will end up with a bridge act at best!
__________________
Expires: 10/2021. Renewal for extension post 2021 sent.
Update your signature: Click on username, control panel, user settings,edit signature
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
fl_dreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to fl_dreamer
Find all posts by fl_dreamer
#25
12-29-2017, 02:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2016
3,631 posts
eva02's Avatar
eva02
0 AP
I’m glad y’all have no say in creating laws. You all would give up your communities, preserve white supremacy, not sponser your parents all for a damn green card, shit maybe not even that, just a damn permit. I can not...
__________________
Expiration: 04/09/2020
Renewal Accepted: 02/05/2019
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
eva02
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eva02
Find all posts by eva02
#26
12-29-2017, 04:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
3,098 posts
fl_dreamer
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva02 View Post
I’m glad y’all have no say in creating laws. You all would give up your communities, preserve white supremacy, not sponser your parents all for a damn green card, shit maybe not even that, just a damn permit. I can not...
And people like you is why we will be BEGGING for a bridge act in March. People like you is why we run the risk of going back to the shadows.
__________________
Expires: 10/2021. Renewal for extension post 2021 sent.
Update your signature: Click on username, control panel, user settings,edit signature
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
fl_dreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to fl_dreamer
Find all posts by fl_dreamer
#27
12-29-2017, 04:46 PM
Senior Member
From Nevada
Joined in Sep 2010
794 posts
MalditoDuende's Avatar
MalditoDuende
0 AP
Idk i think it might be a good idea to give in to his wall idea even though its ridicolous. I mean this is a project thats gonna take years to implement. Between getting contractors to bid, design, and get all the environmental impact reports done, the imminent domain gov will have to claim for most of Texas, etc by the time all this gets done Trump could be out of office and the next president can just cancel
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MalditoDuende
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MalditoDuende
Find all posts by MalditoDuende
#28
12-29-2017, 06:42 PM
Member
Joined in Jul 2012
77 posts
Supportthedream2012
0 AP
Dems need to push this as a humanitarian issue. Do not allow chain migration for DACA recipients who eventually become citizens(Do not allow them to sponsor anyone). Simple as that.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Supportthedream2012
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Supportthedream2012
Find all posts by Supportthedream2012
#29
12-29-2017, 07:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2016
1,674 posts
dreamer12345
0 AP
So much for liking legal immigrants
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamer12345
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamer12345
Find all posts by dreamer12345
#30
12-29-2017, 07:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2017
1,179 posts
CUSenior's Avatar
CUSenior
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supportthedream2012 View Post
Dems need to push this as a humanitarian issue. Do not allow chain migration for DACA recipients who eventually become citizens(Do not allow them to sponsor anyone). Simple as that.
If this was constitutional, it would happen in a heartbeat. But the reality is that one group of citizens can't have more privileges than another group has.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CUSenior
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CUSenior
Find all posts by CUSenior
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.