Cornyn pans Texas lawsuit to end DACA: ‘I honestly don’t understand’ - Page 3

Did you even read the articles,, democrats were the ones who rejected the extension offer at the last minute. All I’m saying is let us at least secure something legislatively even if it’s temporary and get something permanent after 2020 elections.

Why would democrats agree to this when DACA renewals are being allowed? Also this offer was far from a guarantee of passage even if Democrats agreed. Ryan still won't allow any DREAMer legislation to be voted on, so I don't trust his word at all.

There’s no question the Surpeme Court will kill DACA once and for all , but if you guys are saying you would rather lose your jobs, licenses, house/apartment etc than to take a legislatively temporary fix. You fuckers are crazy.

nobody on here is saying they want to lose their livelihoods.

im pretty sure everyone on here will take what they can get but they wont be parading and showing their hard dicks out on the streets as the #1 proponent/advocate of an extension/bridge act.

we get it dude, your like the #1 stan of an extension/bridge act. we all know you'd rather have an extension pass over a permanent solution just to tell us on here "i told you so."

The extension deal that democrats rejected in the last omnibus would have been part of the over all bill and would not require an individual vote. So it was a include it or not include it kind of thing.

Why would Dems back a temporary measure when DACA is still in place? Please think logically bro. You’re making us all look bad.

Obviously you haven’t read my entire posts in this thread, so bye

I did. You basically want a bandaid over an already existing bandaid. Makes no sense.

So those 90 days are almost up and looks like the judges orders are still being upheld that would mean in the following weeks DACA will be restored and will not be touched until next year? Someone help me out here.

it was issued on Apr 24, nowhere close yet to the 90 days. lol