• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

ยซ  

March

  ยป
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Democrats are determined to pass the DREAM Act — even if it means a govt shutdown - Page 4

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›
#31
09-12-2017, 04:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
774 posts
Transcend's Avatar
Transcend
0 AP
Trump is having a dinner at the wh tonight with members of both parties
__________________
Approved: 10/01/2012

"We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness." -G.O., 1984
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Transcend
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Transcend
Find all posts by Transcend
#32
09-12-2017, 04:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
325 posts
Laterlater
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
Again why does his site tend to go harsh on the democrats who voted
No than the republicans who voted no
That bloke, 2face or whatever, mentioned the 6 (it was actually 5) Democratic 'traitors' for voting "NO" for closure motion, while failing or willfully omitting the 36 'traitor' Republican Senators who also voted no.

Because they have a preconceived bias for Republican (yes, shock of shocks); because they take Democratic votes for granted, as a given, as something owed to them; because they do not feel the same to Republicans votes (commendable exception!), which they rationalize and excuse endlessly.

After which, once they benefit from it enormously by obtaining eventual citizenship, will go on to vote Republican.

People have an amazing capacity to believe something simply because they want to believe it is so, despite the evidence; despite the overwhelming counterfactual starting them in the face.
__________________
Originally Posted by desice
As complicated and short life is, it's a shame the things we all have to deal with as human beings. Life is hard enough as it is.
Last edited by Laterlater; 09-12-2017 at 04:59 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Laterlater
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Laterlater
Find all posts by Laterlater
#33
09-12-2017, 05:08 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laterlater View Post
That bloke, 2face or whatever, mentioned the 6 (it was actually 5) Democratic 'traitors' for voting "NO" for closure motion, while failing or willfully omitting the 36 'traitor' Republican Senators who also voted no.

Because they have a preconceived bias for Republican (yes, shock of shocks); because they take Democratic votes for granted, as a given, as something owed to them; because they do not feel the same to Republicans votes (commendable exception!), which they rationalize and excuse endlessly.

After which, once they benefit from it enormously by obtaining eventual citizenship, will go on to vote Republican.

People have an amazing capacity to believe something simply because they want to believe it is so, despite the evidence; despite the overwhelming counterfactual starting them in the face.
Thank you for correcting me. You ought to understand that Dem votes are weighted much higher in this case. Secondly I was quite furious at Republican nay voters (I like to refer to them as Tier 2 traitors) ..people like McCain, Hatch, Rubio, and Snowe who voted No in that 2010 bill. You can't call ALL 36 of them traitors because most are guanarteed No's (Ex. sessions) And whenever i encounter someone who calls Dreamers out for thinking that they are "owed/entitled" I don't take that person seriously. You've got no clue of others stories. You shouldn't be telling anyone what they are and what they are not owed. I certainly do hope the Dems pull this though to us but to me all indications are that they will be gunning to come up with a solution by the last day of the 6th month. The person you are quoting in your signature is against Dream Act passing. Trust me on that.
Last edited by 2Face; 09-12-2017 at 05:11 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#34
09-12-2017, 05:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
374 posts
always_learner11
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laterlater View Post
That bloke, 2face or whatever, mentioned the 6 (it was actually 5) Democratic 'traitors' for voting "NO" for closure motion, while failing or willfully omitting the 36 'traitor' Republican Senators who also voted no.

Because they have a preconceived bias for Republican (yes, shock of shocks); because they take Democratic votes for granted, as a given, as something owed to them; because they do not feel the same to Republicans votes (commendable exception!), which they rationalize and excuse endlessly.

After which, once they benefit from it enormously by obtaining eventual citizenship, will go on to vote Republican.

People have an amazing capacity to believe something simply because they want to believe it is so, despite the evidence; despite the overwhelming counterfactual starting them in the face.
Then there's Pianoswithoutfaith and other folks (from your signature) who would vote Democrat down the line every day until the day the Dream Act passes. Then they also vote Republican. (not sure if Pianoswithoutfaith was joking or not but the concept is the same)

My point is that Democrats may be putting on a huge show (in part) because if they fail, at least they can say they tried. I don't entirely trust the sincerity of Democrats, but I'll go with Democrats over Republicans (and Trump) any day of the week.
__________________
Sent: 8/14/12 , 1/14/18
Arrived in Chicago: 8/16/12 , 1/16/18
Confirmation Text: 8/20/12 , 1/18/18
I-797C: 8/24/12 , 1/22/18
Biometrics: 9/12/12 , 2/14/18
Approved: 9/26
EAD Arrived: 9/29
Expire: 8/7/18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
always_learner11
View Public Profile
Send a private message to always_learner11
Find all posts by always_learner11
#35
09-12-2017, 05:15 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laterlater View Post
That bloke, 2face or whatever, mentioned the 6 (it was actually 5) Democratic 'traitors' for voting "NO" for closure motion, while failing or willfully omitting the 36 'traitor' Republican Senators who also voted no.

Because they have a preconceived bias for Republican (yes, shock of shocks); because they take Democratic votes for granted, as a given, as something owed to them; because they do not feel the same to Republicans votes (commendable exception!), which they rationalize and excuse endlessly.

After which, once they benefit from it enormously by obtaining eventual citizenship, will go on to vote Republican.

People have an amazing capacity to believe something simply because they want to believe it is so, despite the evidence; despite the overwhelming counterfactual starting them in the face.
Oh I get it


"Because we have to suck up to them wahhhhhh they control both house and senate and daddy trump is republican deep down I know I am a democrat and it hurts to know those 6 democrats voted for no but I know if I can pretend enough to be a republican they will accept me"


What the hell is wrong with these people? Do they not realize we lost DA because these Ag who are all republicans threaten to sue?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#36
09-12-2017, 05:18 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
The Accounting is simple. 2010 Dream Act Vote - 55 Nays - 41 Yays.

Votes needed For cloture - 60 votes.

Included in Nays - 5 Democrats

Conclusion: 5 Democrats are responsible for death of Dream Act 2010.

Their time has not come to redeem themselves and give us what we are deserving of. All those in support, say AY. Those who don't fuck off.
Last edited by 2Face; 09-12-2017 at 05:24 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#37
09-12-2017, 05:28 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
374 posts
always_learner11
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
The Accounting is simple. 2010 Dream Act Vote - 55 Nays - 41 Yays.

Votes needed For cloture - 60 votes.

Included in Nays - 5 Democrats

Conclusion: 5 Democrats are responsible for death or Dream Act 2010.

Their time has not come to redeem themselves and give us what we are deserving of. All those in support, say AY. Those who don't fuck off.
The accounting is simple. The reader can arrive at their own conclusion.


50 Democrats Yay for Dream Act
3 Republicans Yay for Dream Act

5 Democrats Nay for Dream Act
36 Republican Nay for Dream Act

Let's hope the accounting is more favorable this time.

Edit: Assuming we even get the bill to the floor for votes.
__________________
Sent: 8/14/12 , 1/14/18
Arrived in Chicago: 8/16/12 , 1/16/18
Confirmation Text: 8/20/12 , 1/18/18
I-797C: 8/24/12 , 1/22/18
Biometrics: 9/12/12 , 2/14/18
Approved: 9/26
EAD Arrived: 9/29
Expire: 8/7/18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
always_learner11
View Public Profile
Send a private message to always_learner11
Find all posts by always_learner11
#38
09-12-2017, 05:32 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
325 posts
Laterlater
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
Again why does his site tend to go harsh on the democrats who voted
No than the republicans who voted no
Quote:
Originally Posted by always_learner11 View Post
The accounting is simple. The reader can arrive at their own conclusion.


50 Democrats Yay for Dream Act
3 Republicans Yay for Dream Act

5 Democrats Nay for Dream Act
36 Republican Nay for Dream Act

Let's hope the accounting is more favorable this time.

Edit: Assuming we even get the bill to the floor for votes.
Curious what adding a bit of context can do, eh?
__________________
Originally Posted by desice
As complicated and short life is, it's a shame the things we all have to deal with as human beings. Life is hard enough as it is.
Last edited by Laterlater; 09-12-2017 at 05:35 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Laterlater
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Laterlater
Find all posts by Laterlater
#39
09-12-2017, 05:33 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2013
314 posts
Cyber1964
0 AP
Can someone tell me how exactly Democrats can attach any bill they want to any other bills? Both the house and senate it under Republicans, so I just don't understand the whole situation.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cyber1964
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cyber1964
Find all posts by Cyber1964
#40
09-12-2017, 07:02 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2017
4,996 posts
libertarian1776's Avatar
libertarian1776
0 AP
for Republicans to get any of their agenda done, they need 8 Democratic Senators to pass anything in the Senate.

e.g tax reform, another extension for the debt ceiling, harvey/irma hurricane relief, military reauthorization, etc.

so Schumer and Pelosi can literally add any amendments to any bill that Republicans want to pass.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyber1964 View Post
Can someone tell me how exactly Democrats can attach any bill they want to any other bills? Both the house and senate it under Republicans, so I just don't understand the whole situation.
__________________
initial DACA: 6/2012
2nd renewal: 9/2014
3rd renewal: 11/2016
4th renewal: 11/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
libertarian1776
View Public Profile
Send a private message to libertarian1776
Find all posts by libertarian1776
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.