• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

May

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Chinese Women Flock to the U.S. to Give Birth - Page 6

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›
#51
12-07-2013, 05:14 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2013
294 posts
EditorInChief
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
He supports a CIR once a 30 feet electric fence has been put up with armed guards at all time, he has made this very clear if you read his other posts. This guy doesn't support a CIR at all - he pretend he does but he doesn't really or he could be one of those patriotic illegal aliens who immediately start supporting for more anti immigration laws as soon he was somehow legalized. Yeah I know its fun to toy with them but hes very strong willed and won't give in. You will make more progress in Washington posts articles


So EditorCheif, tell us again why this country can't support more people

Simple. America would stop being America.

We need to keep more spaces for our own kids. We need to encourage our own people to given birth to more of our own babies, instead of counting on foreigners bringing in more babies from the rest of the world. The US cannot afford to share resources with the entire world.

No other country is sharing their resources with the rest of the world. Why should the US do that? Can the US afford to share resources with the entire world?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EditorInChief
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EditorInChief
Find all posts by EditorInChief
#52
12-07-2013, 05:21 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by EditorInChief View Post
In fact, I am not saying it is just Asian people.

Whoever does this should be blamed.

Nobody cares if it is Asian people, European people, Hispanic people, etc.

The system of anchor babies should be eliminated to benefit everybody who is already here in the US.

Keep more resources for our own kids, instead of kids of foreigners.
How about kicking all the illegals out first before we punish those coming here legally to take advantage of a constitutionally guaranteed benefit? Everybody except for native Americans were foreigners here.
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
#53
12-07-2013, 05:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by EditorInChief View Post
Lee is in fact one of those who are more optimistic about the future of America. He has been successful enough to re-build a country, which means he is more experienced than any of us here in running a country.
And his country is a teeny tiny island with 5 million people. While he has more experience than any of us in this forum in government, he most certainly not more qualified than any Mayor of a large USA city.

Quote:
More importantly, he is an outsider not a stake-holder, so that he can speak more objectively about the green card issue and the immigration issue in the US.
He's an outsider, so he can say whatever (including garbage) because the outcome does not concern him. Whether America flourishes or flounders is not his problem.
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
#54
12-07-2013, 05:29 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by EditorInChief View Post
Simple. America would stop being America.

We need to keep more spaces for our own kids. We need to encourage our own people to given birth to more of our own babies, instead of counting on foreigners bringing in more babies from the rest of the world. The US cannot afford to share resources with the entire world.

No other country is sharing their resources with the rest of the world. Why should the US do that? Can the US afford to share resources with the entire world?
Give me numbers of Anchor babies to support your theory that we're supporting the rest of the world. I must warn you that I have prepared the numbers of US foreign aid to compare that with.

The constitution defines what 'America' is, and it says anyone born here is a citizen. Your definition of America is simply wrong.
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
#55
12-07-2013, 07:07 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2013
294 posts
EditorInChief
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudless View Post
How about kicking all the illegals out first before we punish those coming here legally to take advantage of a constitutionally guaranteed benefit? Everybody except for native Americans were foreigners here.
People already here should be given a path to citizenship, regardless of their existing status.

People in the future should follow legal ways to come to the US.

Loopholes like diversity visa, anchor baby, etc. should be eliminated as completely as possible.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EditorInChief
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EditorInChief
Find all posts by EditorInChief
#56
12-07-2013, 07:10 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2013
294 posts
EditorInChief
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudless View Post
And his country is a teeny tiny island with 5 million people. While he has more experience than any of us in this forum in government, he most certainly not more qualified than any Mayor of a large USA city.


He's an outsider, so he can say whatever (including garbage) because the outcome does not concern him. Whether America flourishes or flounders is not his problem.
He is one of those people who is more optimistic about the future of America.

Singapore is one of the US allies in Asia. He certainly wants the US to continue to lead so that they will continue to have somebody to count on.

Mayor? No, he is much experienced than a mayor.

He is the founding father of a country who is successful in transitioning a country from poor to rich. No US mayor is his match!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EditorInChief
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EditorInChief
Find all posts by EditorInChief
#57
12-07-2013, 07:13 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2013
294 posts
EditorInChief
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudless View Post
Give me numbers of Anchor babies to support your theory that we're supporting the rest of the world. I must warn you that I have prepared the numbers of US foreign aid to compare that with.

The constitution defines what 'America' is, and it says anyone born here is a citizen. Your definition of America is simply wrong.
The system of anchor baby is a way to increase the population of the US, which is my point.

I also argue we should keep those spaces that are occupied by anchor babies reserved for our own kids. It is just that simple!

If you prefer you kids to face worse, stronger competitions from other kids including anchor babies when applying for college/jobs, FINE.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EditorInChief
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EditorInChief
Find all posts by EditorInChief
#58
12-07-2013, 07:21 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by EditorInChief View Post
He is one of those people who is more optimistic about the future of America.

Singapore is one of the US allies in Asia. He certainly wants the US to continue to lead so that they will continue to have somebody to count on.

Mayor? No, he is much experienced than a mayor.

He is the founding father of a country who is successful in transitioning a country from poor to rich. No US mayor is his match!
A country of 5 million people. New York city alone has more people than Singapore, yet you insist Lee's view applies for the entire 300 million-strong USA? A country that is not even considered a real democracy? Lee is a tyrant by US standard. What kind of joke is this?

Argue your point with actual statistics and examples relevant to USA, nobody gives two nickels for Lee's opinion about USA.
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
#59
12-07-2013, 07:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by EditorInChief View Post
People already here should be given a path to citizenship, regardless of their existing status.

People in the future should follow legal ways to come to the US.

Loopholes like diversity visa, anchor baby, etc. should be eliminated as completely as possible.
You're not addressing the constitutionality, you're simply making statements of what should happen according to you, using your own definition. If you simply want to practice demagoguery, you can save it for your own conservative crowd. Here you have to build an actual argument with facts.

Anchor babies are not a 'loophole', they are product of a constitutionally guaranteed benefit. The constitution is the foundation of all the laws in the United States.

By the way, what is a 'loophole' by your definition? A loophole to me is an exception to the general spirit of the law. The spirit of the constitution is equality, so a diversity visa program intended to balance the immigration opportunity to all countries fits that spirit nicely.
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
#60
12-07-2013, 07:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2012
567 posts
Cloudless
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by EditorInChief View Post
The system of anchor baby is a way to increase the population of the US, which is my point.

I also argue we should keep those spaces that are occupied by anchor babies reserved for our own kids. It is just that simple!

If you prefer you kids to face worse, stronger competitions from other kids including anchor babies when applying for college/jobs, FINE.
I still don't see the numbers of Anchor babies that are supposedly draining our economy.

Show me the numbers, the facts. Save your nativist demagoguery for your own crowd.

Show me the numbers.
__________________
Lawfully Present: 8 CFR 1.3
EAD: 8 CFR 274a.12
Visa Quota: Visa Bulletin
Inadmissible Aliens: 8 USC § 1182
Block a forum user: Ignore List
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Cloudless
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Cloudless
Find all posts by Cloudless
  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.