White House's latest regulatory agenda is out. DACA regulation coming in August - Page 2

PapiChulo · 06-23-2022, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beingoflight

no, and dont need one. my experience triumphs a degree

a potential dreamer legalization bill says other wise. lol

it’s not that serious, bruh. calm tf down.

beingoflight · 06-23-2022, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PapiChulo

a potential dreamer legalization bill says other wise. lol

it’s not that serious, bruh. calm tf down.

thats what i mean by democrats not having a realistic view on CIR.

plenty of business owners too

dreamer12345 · 06-24-2022, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdreamer2010

Stop fear mongonering. That’s not what’s going on. The new regulation is posted here: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...898.pdf#page=1

The challenge to DACA by the 9 states is that it violates the APA. The new regulation follows the APA which makes their case moot. The document describes the current legal challenge to DACA on page 16.

So, yes the courts may terminate the original DACA memorandum because of a procedural mistep but DACA will continue under the new regulation.

The ruling and the timing of the finalization of the regulation will probably be coordinated. Even if they’re not and the ruling cones before the regulation, there’s no way in Biden’s administration that ICE will come after DACA recipients.

TLDR: DACA forever

It's not really up to Biden in some ways. The GQP has weaponized the courts so they can use them to reverse DACA, put a moratorium on the new memo w/the latest procedural misstep they pull out of their ass, and "force" ICE to start enforcement. I say "force" because ICE are thugs that will be more than happy to oblige.

Undocumented Immigrant · 06-24-2022, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreamer12345

It's not really up to Biden in some ways. The GQP has weaponized the courts so they can use them to reverse DACA, put a moratorium on the new memo w/the latest procedural misstep they pull out of their ass, and "force" ICE to start enforcement. I say "force" because ICE are thugs that will be more than happy to oblige.

I'm scared and I'm freaking out

vft1008 · 06-24-2022, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undocumented Immigrant

I'm scared and I'm freaking out

You should be.

vft1008 · 06-24-2022, 06:15 PM

2016 Bernie Bros real quiet today...

Undocumented Immigrant · 06-24-2022, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vft1008

You should be.

I'm in the middle of AOS so I basically have a plan B

IamAman · 06-25-2022, 10:44 AM

Anybody read the 81 pages and can do a TLDR; version? I was reading till page 4 and ran across the requirements again. I'm not going to lie, I was hoping that maybe they slipped in something in there to remove the age limit, but nope...I still miss the cut-off by because I was born 6 years too early. I did however notice the bit I didn't notice in the original DACA requirements. What do they mean that by the part in bold about the age requirements, unless they have been in removal proceedings or have a final order? Does that mean that those people don't qualify for DACA or does it mean those who don't meet the requirements get a free pass and do qualify regardless of birthday?

Quote:

• Deferred Action. The proposed rule
would provide a definition of deferred
action as a temporary forbearance from
removal that does not confer any right
or entitlement to remain in or re-enter
the United States, and that does not
prevent DHS from initiating any
criminal or other enforcement action
against the DACA recipient at any time.
• Threshold Criteria. The proposed
rule would include the following
longstanding threshold criteria: That the
requestor must have (1) come to the
United States under the age of 16; (2)
continuously resided in the United
States from June 15, 2007, to the time
of filing of the request; (3) been
physically present in the United States
on both June 15, 2012, and at the time
of filing of the DACA request; (4) not
been in a lawful immigration status on
June 15, 2012, as well as at the time of
request; (5) graduated or obtained a
certificate of completion from high
school, obtained a GED certificate,
currently be enrolled in school, or be an
honorably discharged veteran of the
Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the
United States; (6) not been convicted of
a felony, a misdemeanor described in
the rule, or three or more other
misdemeanors not occurring on the
same date and not arising out of the
same act, omission, or scheme of
misconduct, or otherwise pose a threat
to national security or public safety; and
(7) been born on or after June 16, 1981,
and be at least 15 years of age at the time
of filing, unless the requestor is in
removal proceedings, or has a final
order of removal or a voluntary
departure order. The proposed rule also
would state that deferred action under
DACA may be granted only if USCIS
determines in its sole discretion that the
requestor meets the threshold criteria
and otherwise merits a favorable
exercise of discretion.

IamAman · 06-25-2022, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vft1008

2016 Bernie Bros real quiet today...

Yeah...all that "They're all the same" bullshit and sitting at home and not voting, or voting for Jill Stein really fucked over the country for the next 30 years. All for what? Hillary wasn't socialist enough to their liking? She wasn't "Likable"? A lot of Republicans didn't like Trump but held their nose and voted for him specifically because of the supreme court.

Swim19 · 06-25-2022, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IamAman

Anybody read the 81 pages and can do a TLDR; version? I was reading till page 4 and ran across the requirements again. I'm not going to lie, I was hoping that maybe they slipped in something in there to remove the age limit, but nope...I still miss the cut-off by because I was born 6 years too early. I did however notice the bit I didn't notice in the original DACA requirements. What do they mean that by the part in bold about the age requirements, unless they have been in removal proceedings or have a final order? Does that mean that those people don't qualify for DACA or does it mean those who don't meet the requirements get a free pass and do qualify regardless of birthday?

Hmmm...that wording is strange...it does almost sound like the age requirement doesn't count in that instant, but I haven't read anything about that anywhere else

They need you!

Forum links

Resources

Join our list

National calendar of events

July

White House's latest regulatory agenda is out. DACA regulation coming in August - Page 2