• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

White House disputes claims immigration reform is 'dead'

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
#1
03-30-2010, 04:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
The White House rejected on Tuesday a top Republican senator's suggestion that immigration reform was "dead" in the Senate this year.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that President Barack Obama and other administration officials would continue reaching out to lawmakers in both parties to gauge the extent to which immigration reform legislation is attainable this year.

"I, not surprisingly, would likely disagree with that characterization," Gibbs said during his daily press briefing in response to Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) claim last week that a bruising healthcare battle made immigration reform all but impossible in the Senate.

Graham had been partnering with Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on potential comprehensive immigration reform legislation, about which they met with Obama earlier this month.

But the South Carolina Republican said that little political will was left to move forward on a politically thorny issue like immigration.

"This is not an issue that's going to be decided by just getting all the Democratic members to support immigration reform," Gibbs said. "There have to be Republicans that come aboard, too."

"Those conversations, the president is likely to have with Republican members in the near future," the press secretary added. "And we'll gauge whether or not it's possible to move forward on this issue."

Graham has challenged the administration to write its own immigration bill to move through the Congress, a challenge which Gibbs sidestepped on Tuesday, noting that the president finds a number of aspects in the Schumer-Graham proposal "greatly appealing."
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...reform-is-dead
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
#2
03-30-2010, 04:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
1,386 posts
Mona Lisa's Avatar
Mona Lisa
0 AP
oh boy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Mona Lisa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Mona Lisa
Find all posts by Mona Lisa
#3
03-30-2010, 05:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
617 posts
gebodupa
0 AP
It's not dead, I say.... but it's in critical condition, on life-support, and probably will not make to May.

Quote:
"This is not an issue that's going to be decided by just getting all the Democratic members to support immigration reform," Gibbs said. "There have to be Republicans that come aboard, too."
Isn't the point of winning the election and having a seat in Congress, to have a majority and pretty much being able to pass laws that go along with the ideologiy of your party? What if the Dems. had 75 seats? Would they still be saying "Well we need a few Reps because ****?" If people in like Alabama don't want CIR that's their problem. The point of a centralized government with state representation is that you get a vote but that's it; if the rest of the country wants something else that's that. We already had a Civil War about this kind of representation and we know how that turned out for the South.

Quote:
Graham has challenged the administration to write its own immigration bill to move through the Congress, a challenge which Gibbs sidestepped on Tuesday, noting that the president finds a number of aspects in the Schumer-Graham proposal "greatly appealing."
For like the Xth time I hear about this so called proposal, but does anybody have any info as to what is actually in there?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
gebodupa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gebodupa
Find all posts by gebodupa
#4
03-30-2010, 05:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2009
110 posts
thebeast
0 AP
This like a f/***//*roller coaster then it drops!!.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
thebeast
View Public Profile
Send a private message to thebeast
Find all posts by thebeast
#5
03-30-2010, 05:58 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by gebodupa View Post
It's not dead, I say.... but it's in critical condition, on life-support, and probably will not make to May.



Isn't the point of winning the election and having a seat in Congress, to have a majority and pretty much being able to pass laws that go along with the ideologiy of your party? What if the Dems. had 75 seats? Would they still be saying "Well we need a few Reps because ****?" If people in like Alabama don't want CIR that's their problem. The point of a centralized government with state representation is that you get a vote but that's it; if the rest of the country wants something else that's that. We already had a Civil War about this kind of representation and we know how that turned out for the South.



For like the Xth time I hear about this so called proposal, but does anybody have any info as to what is actually in there?

The only proposal to come out is the "blueprint" that Graham and Schumer released on 3/18/2010. There is a thread on here with what they had to say.
Last edited by Feenmi; 03-30-2010 at 06:01 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
#6
03-30-2010, 06:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
617 posts
gebodupa
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feenmi View Post
The only proposal to come out is the "blueprint" that Graham and Schumer released on 3/18/2010. There is a thread on here with what they had to say.
Thanks, do you remember the article title by any chance. There are so many threads in the news section and they do not show the date on which they were posted, so that its hard to find anything.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
gebodupa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gebodupa
Find all posts by gebodupa
#7
03-30-2010, 07:04 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by gebodupa View Post
Thanks, do you remember the article title by any chance. There are so many threads in the news section and they do not show the date on which they were posted, so that its hard to find anything.
No problem. Here is the link to the thread that has the entire peice that schumer and Graham wrote together.

http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisp...er=desc&page=3
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
#8
03-30-2010, 07:10 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,161 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
"White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that President Barack Obama and other administration officials would continue reaching out to lawmakers in both parties to gauge the extent to which immigration reform legislation is attainable this year. "


Translation: "...[b]to gauge the extent to which immigration reform legislation is attainable this year[/B." , means "We do not KNOW IF we can do this since we haven't done ANYTHING to progress it in the last 15 months. And we will only do it IF the other side does part of our job for us". Does anyone know/seen/read/heard what's happened to Gutierrez? For two months he was on the news, web, and in print just about daily, and now that he voted for insurance reform, he's MIA.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#9
03-30-2010, 09:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2010
343 posts
dreamberry's Avatar
dreamberry
210 AP
Its a good thing Robert Gibbs came out and told us Senator Graham was just talking out of his ass.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamberry
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamberry
Find all posts by dreamberry
#10
03-30-2010, 10:00 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
At this point "good as dead"
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.