• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

TRENDING: Graham move imperils Obama agenda

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
04-24-2010, 05:06 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Source : http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...Oy#more-101138

From CNN's Dana Bash and Ed Henry


Graham has decided to abandon talks with Democrats on climate change legislation.
(CNN) – In a stunning move that could throw a major roadblock in front of two of President Obama's biggest legislative initiatives, Sen. Lindsey Graham abruptly declared Saturday he's abandoning talks on climate change legislation because he believes Democratic efforts to bring up a separate immigration reform package is undermining the legislative process.

"Moving forward on immigration - in this hurried, panicked manner - is nothing more than a cynical political ploy," the South Carolina Republican wrote in a sharply-worded letter obtained by CNN.

The letter was sent to business, religious, and conservation leaders that the senator has been working with on the climate change legislation. An aide to Graham told CNN the senator will no longer be attending a major news conference scheduled for Monday with Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut to unveil details of their "tri-partisan" climate change legislation.

Graham is the only leading Republican who has been working with the White House on the contentious issue.


A senior White House official told CNN that in recent days Graham has been privately threatening that he would abandon the climate talks unless Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, backed off of plans to push forward with comprehensive immigration reform ahead of the environmental legislation.

Reid released a statement Saturday saying he’s still committed to tackling both issues and will not be deterred by Graham’s decision.

“I appreciate the work of Senator Graham on both of these issues and understand the tremendous pressure he is under from members of his own party not to work with us on either measure,” said Reid. “But I will not allow him to play one issue off of another, and neither will the American people. They expect us to do both, and they will not accept the notion that trying to act on one is an excuse for not acting on the other."

An aide said Graham was involved in a "flurry" of talks in the last 48 hours with Kerry and Lieberman and in those conversations nobody disabused the Republican of - as CNN reported Friday – the fact that Senate Democrats have changed course and will now move immigration ahead of climate change on the legislative calendar in the coming weeks. CNN reported Friday that climate change is now unlikely to even make it to the Senate floor at all this year.

Graham's decision to release the letter allowed the private negotiations to spill into the public, and administration officials acknowledge it now could be much harder for Obama to get bipartisan consensus on both issues that are key to his agenda.

In his letter, Graham blasted the Democratic plans to move immigration reform ahead of climate change legislation: "Let's be clear, a phony, political effort on immigration today accomplishes nothing but making it exponentially more difficult to address in a serious, comprehensive manner in the future”

"Unless their plan substantially changes this weekend, I will be unable to move forward on energy independence legislation at this time. I will not allow our hard work to be rolled out in a manner that has no chance of success,” he added.

But a senior Democratic source involved in the climate change talks fired back that "the only thing 'phony' here is Lindsay Graham" because he's pulling out amid pressure from fellow Republicans to block Obama's agenda.

This is also an about-face on immigration reform for Graham because he has been pressing the White House to move forward on comprehensive reform on that issue as well. His move comes just one day after Obama called on both parties to pass immigration reform on the federal level in response to a new law in Arizona that will allow local police to stop individuals suspected of being illegal immigrants.

Democrats privately charged Saturday that Graham was trying to scuttle immigration reform in order to protect his close friend, Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, from having to deal with a sticky issue in advance of his tough August GOP primary battle in Arizona to keep his Senate seat. McCain has previously pushed for comprehensive immigration reform but has been recently talking about securing America's borders first, a position that puts the senator more in line with his conservative primary opponent, former Rep. J.D. Hayworth.

But Graham spokesman Kevin Bishop told CNN those allegations are "nonsense." He said Graham's letter has nothing to do with McCain and everything to do with the fact that Senate Democrats are talking about a quick three-week window to try and push through immigration reform.

"Senator Graham worked on immigration for many months in 2007 with virtually every senator and two cabinet secretaries," said Bishop. "It was an unprecedented effort and it is what it takes to put together a comprehensive plan. A serious immigration plan cannot be put together in three weeks."
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#2
04-24-2010, 05:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2007
181 posts
CookieEater's Avatar
CookieEater
0 AP
how does this mean immigration is next? it just shows Grahams unwillingness to support a climate bill if immigration is placed on the agenda before the climate bill.

which is bullshit, but oh well.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CookieEater
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CookieEater
Find all posts by CookieEater
#3
04-24-2010, 05:19 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
If Graham's abandoning climate change and effort is falling apart, then there's only one issue left to be introduced: IMMIGRATION! I hope Graham is trashing his cooperation in climate change, cus he NEEDED MORE TIME TO FINALIZE CIR!

The notion that three weeks is not enough is TOTAL NONSENSE. CIR has been debated before and the congress is well aware of the implications, IT JUST NEEDS TO BE PASSED!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#4
04-24-2010, 05:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2009
182 posts
Biblio
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonawabich View Post
If Graham's abandoning climate change and effort is falling apart, then there's only one issue left to be introduced: IMMIGRATION! I hope Graham is trashing his cooperation in climate change, cus he NEEDED MORE TIME TO FINALIZE CIR!

The notion that three weeks is not enough is TOTAL NONSENSE. CIR has been debated before and the congress is well aware of the implications, IT JUST NEEDS TO BE PASSED!
Did you not read the article? If he wont even finish up the work on climate legislation, what makes you think that he wants to move on to CIR?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Biblio
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Biblio
Find all posts by Biblio
#5
04-24-2010, 05:28 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CookieEater View Post
how does this mean immigration is next? it just shows Grahams unwillingness to support a climate bill if immigration is placed on the agenda before the climate bill.

which is bullshit, but oh well.
He is very much leaning on the CIR. Why do we care about the Climate Bill?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#6
04-24-2010, 05:38 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biblio View Post
Did you not read the article? If he wont even finish up the work on climate legislation, what makes you think that he wants to move on to CIR?
Its not about what he wants. Its about what he will be handed out to by Reid.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#7
04-24-2010, 06:18 PM
Senior Member
From West Hollywood
Joined in Sep 2007
1,234 posts
angeleno's Avatar
angeleno
59 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonawabich View Post
Its not about what he wants. Its about what he will be handed out to by Reid.
Exactly.

If he doesn't want to cosponsor the bill anymore, then fuck him. Reid made it perfectly clear that if this idiot and Schumer don't produce a bill fast enough, he will come up with his own.
__________________
American Foundation for Equal Rights
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
angeleno
View Public Profile
Send a private message to angeleno
Visit angeleno's homepage!
Find all posts by angeleno
#8
04-24-2010, 06:20 PM
Senior Member
From The Great State of Texas
Joined in Dec 2009
339 posts
DREAMactASAP's Avatar
DREAMactASAP
0 AP
I really hope they keep the biometric ID card in there though. That sounds way cool, and I would love to have one.

I guess because I've never had something like it and everybody else has (SS card, state ID, license, etc.)
__________________
Do not lose faith and do not lose heart. Never give up.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DREAMactASAP
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DREAMactASAP
Find all posts by DREAMactASAP
#9
04-24-2010, 07:07 PM
Senior Member
From Georgia
Joined in Nov 2009
422 posts
Jelly Bean Lover's Avatar
Jelly Bean Lover
120 AP
So if Graham is not on board then, where do we realistically think that we are going to get the other four votes from?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Jelly Bean Lover
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Jelly Bean Lover
Find all posts by Jelly Bean Lover
#10
04-24-2010, 07:23 PM
Senior Member
From West Hollywood
Joined in Sep 2007
1,234 posts
angeleno's Avatar
angeleno
59 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelly Bean Lover View Post
So if Graham is not on board then, where do we realistically think that we are going to get the other four votes from?
Uhhh...

http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=14508
__________________
American Foundation for Equal Rights
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
angeleno
View Public Profile
Send a private message to angeleno
Visit angeleno's homepage!
Find all posts by angeleno
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.