• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

House Democrats prod Senate to take up immigration bill

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
04-28-2010, 06:29 PM
Senior Member
From The Great State of Texas
Joined in Dec 2009
339 posts
DREAMactASAP's Avatar
DREAMactASAP
0 AP
What does this mean exactly? Anyone have a guess?

Does the bill state to secure borders first, then in about a year or so give legal status? (All in the same bill so we can be sure that we don't get played and then they secure the borders but don't do anything about legalizing?)

-----------------------------------------

House Democrats Wednesday called on their Senate counterparts to not be undermined by naysayers who doubt passing a comprehensive immigration measure is possible this summer, saying that a bill should be brought to the floor as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, key Senate Democrats began circulating a 26-page outline of a border security and immigration reform bill. [Better than that damn 1-page "blueprint".]The draft, obtained by CongressDaily, calls for securing the border before giving illegal immigrants in the country legal status by increasing the number of border and immigration agents and creating a technology system to verify when foreigners leave the country.

The draft, which is being circulated by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., along with Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Robert Menendez, D-N.J., would increase fines by 300 percent on employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants, require workers to carry a biometric identification card, and create a federal commission to recommend visa levels. The commission would be able to declare an immigration emergency.

Wednesday's call for action came mainly from members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and Congressional Black Caucus in response to recent developments in the Senate that cast doubt on the prospects of advancing immigration legislation that would give an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the country a path to citizenship.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said this week, for example, that an immigration bill would "crash and burn" if it were brought to the floor in the near term because there are not 60 votes to support it. Graham has been the only Senate Republican seriously working with Democrats on crafting a reform measure.

At a news conference Wednesday, Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., Hispanic Caucus Immigration Task Force chairman, said Graham has "undermined the whole process" and left Reid hanging.

"Let's not blame Harry Reid," Gutierrez said. "He was thrown a curveball this week."

Gutierrez said Senate Democrats do not yet have 60 votes to pass a Wall Street regulatory bill but they keep bringing it to the floor.

"That's what we expect from them on comprehensive immigration reform," Gutierrez said. "It is time for them to make their proposal clear."

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, said lawmakers will not be intimidated by Graham's threats to walk away from negotiating other legislation if immigration reform advances.

"I will say to him, 'So what?' " she said. "We will not be intimidated by you."

Although Reid indicated this week he would advance energy and climate change legislation before immigration reform, Rep. Mike Honda, D-Calif., said he believes Reid ultimately will provide the leadership necessary to shepherd an immigration bill through the Senate.

Groups that favor an overhaul of immigration laws plan rallies and demonstrations in more than 70 U.S. cities Saturday to demand the Senate pass a reform bill and to protest a new law in Arizona that empowers local police to detain anybody they reasonably suspect of being in the country illegally.

House Democrats who spoke at Wednesday's news conference roundly denounced the new law and said it shows the need for Congress to overhaul the nation's immigration laws.

"The question is, where are we as a federal government and a nation and what are we going to do about it?" said Rep. Yvette Clarke, D-N.Y.

Rep. Joe Baca, D-Calif., called for a boycott of Arizona, adding that he personally will not travel through the state.

Source: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cf...ref=todaysnews
__________________
Do not lose faith and do not lose heart. Never give up.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DREAMactASAP
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DREAMactASAP
Find all posts by DREAMactASAP
#2
04-28-2010, 06:36 PM
Senior Member
From West Hollywood
Joined in Sep 2007
1,234 posts
angeleno's Avatar
angeleno
59 AP
I'm glad Reid knows he's the boss, not Graham.
__________________
American Foundation for Equal Rights
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
angeleno
View Public Profile
Send a private message to angeleno
Visit angeleno's homepage!
Find all posts by angeleno
#3
04-28-2010, 06:41 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
"Calls for securing the border before giving illegal immigrants in the country legal status."
I hope we get more details on what exactly they mean by this soon. But it's good to hear they're not letting Lindsey Graham's temper tantrums pressure them into tabling CIR.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
#4
04-28-2010, 06:42 PM
Senior Member
From L.A., California
Joined in Oct 2007
960 posts
kenny1314
0 AP
i don't understand why don't they secure the border and legalize the illegal immigration at the same time. 2012 is the long year, we don't want keep waiting and nothing happened in 2012 AGAIN
__________________
OBAMA-BIDEN 2008
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
kenny1314
View Public Profile
Send a private message to kenny1314
Find all posts by kenny1314
#5
04-28-2010, 06:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
Nice find,you can also download the 26 page blueprint here.Only reference to Dream act is the following.
Quote:
In addition, the stand-alone registration programs provided by the DREAM Act and the AGJOBS legislation will also be included within this proposal
It is also interesting to note that the immigration bill in general says it will take 8 years of interim status before someone may apply for Permanent residency.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#6
04-28-2010, 07:25 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
This is pure genius!

Please please let this pass!

PLEASE
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#7
04-28-2010, 07:31 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2009
429 posts
txdream's Avatar
txdream
0 AP
This has to pass.
__________________
Living a somewhat normal life now...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
txdream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to txdream
Find all posts by txdream
#8
04-28-2010, 07:34 PM
Senior Member
From The Great State of Texas
Joined in Dec 2009
339 posts
DREAMactASAP's Avatar
DREAMactASAP
0 AP
I just read the proposal of the bill. Perfectly fine with me. It will take 8 years, but at least you can work and travel in the mean time. (but if we qualify under the DREAM portion, it will take less I'm guessing)

I just wish that the date for eligible persons would be those that have been here since 2007 or earlier and not since the bill gets introduced. Then people can still keep coming until this bill is introduced and qualify.

In any case, I will be forever grateful mainly to Senator Schumer if this comes to life.
__________________
Do not lose faith and do not lose heart. Never give up.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DREAMactASAP
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DREAMactASAP
Find all posts by DREAMactASAP
#9
04-28-2010, 08:27 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
329 posts
swordfish
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenny1314 View Post
i don't understand why don't they secure the border and legalize the illegal immigration at the same time. 2012 is the long year, we don't want keep waiting and nothing happened in 2012 AGAIN
"Secure the border" is as bogus as "reasonable suspicious".
Same party who passed the AZ law wants to permanently postpone CIR. THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL GOP is going to declare the border as "SECURED". E V E R.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
swordfish
View Public Profile
Send a private message to swordfish
Find all posts by swordfish
#10
04-28-2010, 11:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2009
429 posts
txdream's Avatar
txdream
0 AP
I knew obama was full of ****. I'm sorry but he is
__________________
Living a somewhat normal life now...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
txdream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to txdream
Find all posts by txdream


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.