Scott Brown says he's willing to work with Democrats on CIR

http://www.boston.com/news/local/mas...us_on_economy/

Well, this is better than "Deport them all", right?

yes... but this doesn't mean much. It's just 1 guy in a sea of red... unless he's talking about doing it in the lame duck session.

Call Sen Scott Brown NOW

His a senator from a Liberal state. If he Looks too conservative He will not win his re-election on 2012.

When the Repub Title wave arrived it did not hit Massachusetts as bad as other states in fact i think Brown is the only Repub to be in congress from that state.... the rest are all Dems. His just trying to get re-elected.

That's right...Massachusetts is blue again!!

depends, if he is talking about the lame duck session then it is just as well that he is saying to terminate all chances of legalization. CIR is not going to pass this lame duck, not something that expansive, complicated and controversial. A strategist that wants to make sure nothing gets passed regarding immigration might support the bill less likely to pass and push for it.

I hope that he is not doing this with that in mind and is willing to really considering the DREAM Act as a stand alone.

This means nothing if he strictly supports CIR.

Senator Kay Hagan from North Carolina has repeatedly said she supports CIR but would never vote for DREAM as a standalone.

So are we making calls to Sen Brown?

Then this means he should be leaning towards a YES on Dream Act too. Thats what we need him to do.

It means that he want to discuss federal immigration reform, and he will vote yes on what he does not consider "fluff."

Sounds like a tactic being put out to promote prolonging anything until republicans take control next year, or pushing the more controversial CIR which would be next to impossible to pass during the lame duck session.

All it does is bring him from a nay to an unclear as far as his position on the DREAM Act is concerned. We don't even know what he considers "fluff."