• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Victory! Illegal-Alien Tuition Breaks Allowed by U.S. Supreme Court

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
06-06-2011, 11:52 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,159 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
June 6 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court left intact a California law that makes illegal immigrants eligible for the reduced tuition paid at public colleges and universities by legal state residents.

The justices today turned away an appeal by a group of non- Californians who attend school in the state and pay as much as $20,000 per year more than residents. The students said 25,000 illegal aliens pay the lower tuition each year, costing the state $208 million.

California is one of nine states that make undocumented aliens eligible for in-state tuition, according to the suing students.

The case turned on a 1996 federal law that limits the power of states to offer reduced tuition to those in the country illegally. The law says illegal immigrants can’t claim lower tuition “on the basis of residence within a state” unless all U.S. citizens are similarly eligible.

The California law doesn’t explicitly tie the tuition of illegal aliens to their place of residency. The measure instead says those students are entitled to the lower tuition if they graduated from a California high school after having attended one for at least three years.

The California Supreme Court unanimously upheld the state law, saying it is based on “other criteria,” not residency.

The case is Martinez v. Regents of the University of California, 10-1029.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...eme-court.html
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#2
06-06-2011, 11:57 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,204 posts
CB124
20 AP
What was the vote?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CB124
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CB124
Find all posts by CB124
#3
06-06-2011, 12:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
1,932 posts
Feenmi's Avatar
Feenmi
290 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by CB124 View Post
What was the vote?
They turned it away...meaning there was not vote. No?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Feenmi
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Feenmi
Find all posts by Feenmi
#4
06-06-2011, 12:18 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2010
1,256 posts
iDream
0 AP
This is the AB540?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
iDream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to iDream
Find all posts by iDream
#5
06-06-2011, 12:34 PM
Senior Member
From The City of Angels, which is located in the Golden State of the Union
Joined in May 2007
705 posts
VaeVictis's Avatar
VaeVictis
0 AP
Here's a clearer article: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...0,770265.story
__________________
"We have nothing to dream, but DREAM itself."
- reinterpreting FDR's first inaugural address
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VaeVictis
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VaeVictis
Find all posts by VaeVictis
#6
06-06-2011, 01:03 PM
Senior Member
From Southern California
Joined in Jun 2009
260 posts
xav1er07's Avatar
xav1er07
0 AP
yea ab540.....
__________________
Hard work accounts for many accomplishments
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
xav1er07
View Public Profile
Send a private message to xav1er07
Find all posts by xav1er07
#7
06-06-2011, 01:57 PM
Senior Member
From Dallas, TX
Joined in Oct 2010
1,152 posts
cooltalker's Avatar
cooltalker
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
The students said 25,000 illegal aliens pay the lower tuition each year, costing the state $208 million.
This statement is absolutely flawed. If these "illegal aliens" were not eligible for in-state tuition, then most of them would not have access higher education. Consequently, the state would actually lose a stream of financial revenue.

Otherwise, such logic implies that all residents who pay in-state tuition are financially detrimental to the state; therefore, out-of-state tuition should be imposed on EVERYONE.
Last edited by cooltalker; 06-06-2011 at 02:27 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
cooltalker
View Public Profile
Send a private message to cooltalker
Find all posts by cooltalker
#8
06-06-2011, 08:58 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,675 posts
TexasDreamy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooltalker View Post
This statement is absolutely flawed. If these "illegal aliens" were not eligible for in-state tuition, then most of them would not have access higher education. Consequently, the state would actually lose a stream of financial revenue.

Otherwise, such logic implies that all residents who pay in-state tuition are financially detrimental to the state; therefore, out-of-state tuition should be imposed on EVERYONE.
Dude, it costs the state something like $20k per student per year to educate a student at the higher education level. Out of state students pay this entire price -- but the state subsidizes the tuition of resident students because either they or their parents pay taxes or the state hopes that the students will one day contribute to the economy.

Considering how very few of the DREAMers that don't legalize will ever make above poverty level and pay taxes, illegal immigrants really are a drain on the educational system.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexasDreamy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexasDreamy
Find all posts by TexasDreamy
#9
06-06-2011, 10:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2009
526 posts
Juan92
10 AP
they rejected the vote, but i don't think this says a lot .
__________________
Every day i see my dream.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Juan92
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Juan92
Find all posts by Juan92
#10
06-07-2011, 12:30 AM
BANNED
From San Bernardino, CA
Joined in Sep 2010
1,202 posts
LifeDreamer
0 AP
I told you guys we had this in the bag!!!! People need to learn how to chill..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
LifeDreamer
View Public Profile
Find all posts by LifeDreamer
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.