House Dem: 'Middle ground' on immigration would create subclass of citizens

Ianus · 02-06-2013, 04:22 PM

http://thehill.com/video/house/28140...ss-of-citizens

Quote:

Democratic Rep. Joe Garcia (D-Fla.) on Wednesday rejected Republicans calls for a middle ground on the legal status of illegal immigrants, warning that anything less than full citizenship would divide the country.

"These are type B Americans, right? We have type A and type B. The ones that get taxed but don't get representation. The ones that have all the responsibility but none of the great benefits of being a citizen. Look, this is precisely where we make a mistake," Garcia, a member of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security, said on MSNBC.

A number of top Republicans have signaled a willingness to pass immigration reform, but there is strong resistance in the House to providing a pathway to citizenship for illegal residents.

"Are there options we should consider between the extremes of mass deportation and a pathway to citizenship?" Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, asked Tuesday during the first hearing by his panel on immigration reform in the 113th Congress.

An agreement on citizenship is one of the biggest hurdles in the push for immigration reform. While a number of House Republicans have called the idea "amnesty," some Senate Republicans have backed a pathway in principle, so long as it only becomes available after border security is tightened.

Garcia said immigration reform without a pathway to citizenship would lead the country to a failed immigration system similar to those in other countries.

"If you look at failed immigration systems — you look at the German immigration system, you look at the French system where people don't become French, they don't become German, they are Turks who live in Germany or they become Muslims who live in Paris," Garcia said. "The reality is we need full Americans. These folks work hard. They take care of our children. They pick our fields. They work in the most difficult jobs and what we need to do is make them pay their back taxes, make them learn English, get them in the back of the line and at the end they get the great benefit, bounty of being an American citizen."

Asked about the timeline for Congress to pass immigration reform, Garcia predicted the first step would come from the Senate.

"I think the Senate is pretty close to having something very comprehensive," Garcia said. "I don't see that willingness in my colleagues on the House side. Hopefully we'll get something out. My hope is that by the middle of summer we'll get something for the president to sign."

This is one of the things I love about this country even though it maybe ambivalent at times,inclusion or nothing.

EditorInChief · 02-06-2013, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ianus

http://thehill.com/video/house/28140...ss-of-citizensThis is one of the things I love about this country even though it maybe ambivalent at times,inclusion or nothing.

The case FOR high-skilled immigrants is that they do NOT have to work for the US. They have resources to work for other countries to beat the US.

The case AGAINST LGBT is that LGBT is against the mainframe religious belief of the US. LGBT can effectively ruin the chance of CIR because even Democrats may oppose it.

Pianoswithoutfaith · 02-06-2013, 11:41 PM

Yeah but American are more pro gay than pro immigrant

So I wouldn't be surpise if LGBT issue is fixed before a immigration reform

S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28

They need you!

Forum links

Resources

Join our list

National calendar of events

February

House Dem: 'Middle ground' on immigration would create subclass of citizens