• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

May

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Obama's immigration plan may be a decoy

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
02-21-2013, 04:23 AM
Senior Member
From Midwest
Joined in Aug 2008
686 posts
2dreamORnot2dream's Avatar
2dreamORnot2dream
0 AP
http://www.clarionledger.com/article...plan-may-decoy

Quote:

Republicans spent the weekend trumpeting shock and outrage over President Obama’s leaked “backup plan” on immigration. In dysfunctional Washington, this means that prospects for comprehensive reform are getting brighter.

“Dead on arrival” was the verdict from Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said the White House proposal — which hasn’t actually been proposed — shows that Obama is “really not serious” about reform. Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said Obama’s plan “tells us that he’s looking for a partisan advantage and not a bipartisan solution.”

Translation: Things are looking up!

Here’s the state of play: In the November election, Obama carried both the nation’s largest minority — Hispanics — and its fastest-growing minority — Asian-Americans — by nearly 3-to-1. Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants, has been trying to explain to his party that immigration is a “threshold” issue for communities with fresh memories of arrival.

So a bipartisan group of eight senators, led by Rubio, has been working to develop a comprehensive reform package.

The outlines of a solution are obvious. There would be a clear path to citizenship for those who were brought here as children. There would be provisional legal status, and a route to permanent legal status, for those who came as adults. There would be measures to tighten security along the border with Mexico. There would probably be some kind of guest-worker program for those who seek only to come for seasonal employment. And there would be changes to streamline the legal immigration system, especially for high-tech workers and potential entrepreneurs.

Enter the president’s draft proposal, which administration officials described as a “backup” plan that Obama may put forward if Congress is not able to reach agreement. It’s really not much different from what Rubio’s group is talking about.

Republicans in the Senate can line up instead behind a bill that Rubio’s Group of Eight eventually produces; even Paul, a tea party favorite, has indicated he could vote for reform as long as he had more than “a promise from President Obama” on border security. And if enough contrast can be drawn between a Senate proposal and Obama’s plan, perhaps even a significant number of House Republicans can be brought along.

In other words, this isn’t so much about what is being proposed. The bigger factor is who’s proposing it — as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich acknowledged Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

“An Obama plan, led and driven by Obama in this atmosphere, with the level of hostility toward the president and the way he goads the hostility, I think it is very hard to imagine that bill, that his bill is going to pass the House,” Gingrich said. But he added that a bill originating in the Senate “could actually get to the president’s desk.”

I believe Gingrich is right.

Republican members of Congress have shown a willingness, even an eagerness, to vote against measures that they themselves have sponsored in the past — if Obama is now proposing them.

So if the president really wants immigration reform to pass, one of the most helpful things he could do is put out his own plan as a decoy, to draw Republican fire, while the Senate works toward bipartisan consensus. Which looks suspiciously like what just happened.
__________________
“…If you don’t have a job and you’re not rich blame yo’ self…” - Herman Cain
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2dreamORnot2dream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2dreamORnot2dream
Find all posts by 2dreamORnot2dream
#2
02-21-2013, 11:07 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2008
606 posts
chopstix
0 AP
sounds like a plan to me
__________________
Application sent:9/7/12-self (EAC-NYC)
I-797c notice: 9/20/12 | Biometrics: 10/18/12
Approval Notice: 12/10/12 | EAD: 12/17/12 | SSN: 1/2/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
chopstix
View Public Profile
Send a private message to chopstix
Find all posts by chopstix
#3
02-21-2013, 01:13 PM
BANNED
Joined in Jul 2012
1,295 posts
Laker24x
0 AP
"led by Rubio" lol
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Laker24x
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Laker24x


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.