• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

GOP senators reaffirm citizenship path plan, despite Jeb Bush comments

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
03-05-2013, 11:47 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,572 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...394_story.html
Quote:
Senate Republicans involved in touchy negotiations to overhaul immigration laws reaffirmed their commitment Tuesday to establishing a path to citizenship for those now living in the United States illegally — despite a surprising defection on the key issue from former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

But two key members of that group acknowledged for the first time Tuesday that they may not have a bill ready to introduce until April, after Congress’s two-week Easter recess. The eight-member group had been aiming to advance a bill in March.


Bush, a longtime proponent of immigration changes, surprised many immigrant advocates this week with the publication of a long-awaited book on the topic. In the book, he advocates allowing the nation’s 11 million illegal immigrants to seek permanent legal residency in the United States, but not citizenship.

That issue has already shaped up to be one of the key dividing lines in the Congressional debate over immigration. Illustrating the shifting ground, Bush has given several interviews as part of the book roll-out further revising his position and indicating that he could, in fact, support a path to citizenship.

In a statement of principles published in January, the eight-member Senate group endorsed a path to citizenship, but a number of House Republicans have objected.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a member of the group, said he was “surprised” by Bush’s proposal, particularly since it comes from a governor who had long been out front on the need for an immigration overhaul and is well-liked in the Hispanic community.

He argued members of the Republican party who believe it is amnesty to allow illegal immigrants to remain in the country will not be appeased by denying them eventual citizenship.

“From a policy point of view, I don’t think it’s the right approach. I don’t like the idea of having millions of people here for their entire life without being able to assimilate into America,” he said. “From a political point of view, we’ve got 55 Democrats sent and a 72 percent support for a path to citizenship. It’s just not practical to think we’ll be able to pass any bill in the United States Senate without a path to citizenship.”

Behind the scenes, advocates and congressional sources familiar with the negotiations say the path to citizenship is not the trickiest issue facing the Senate group, which has been working to translate a joint statement of principles into a bill since January,

They say the more difficult issue for the Senate group has been how to structure a low-skill visa for temporary workers, an issue that has helped stymied past efforts to rewrite immigration laws.

Though the group has been meeting two to three times a week, it has not yet been able to resolve the difficult topic.


FL-CIO President Richard Trumka came to the Hill Tuesday to meet with the gang’s four Democratic members, as the two sides shuttle proposals for the low-skill visa program back and forth between the unions and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a Senate aide said.

“They’re hitting some tough issues balancing business and labor,” said another congressional source. Both spoke anonymously because they are not authorized to speak about the negotiations.

“They’re still working and no one’s thrown anyone over the side. It’s tough stuff, but it’s like a railroad. They’re going down the track and none of the signals are flashing red yet.”

Members of the Senate group had been aiming to advance a joint bill in March. For the first time Tuesday, Graham and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) both said they were uncertain if they would be able to finish the bill before Congress leaves for an Easter recess March 22.

Even if they complete the bill right before the recess, the group is starting to discuss whether it would be wise to put it forward and then immediately leave Washington, ceding the floor to critics to pick it apart during a two-week recess.

“You don’t want to leave it hanging out for two weeks to get shot up,” Graham said.

Republicans involved in the group took pains to stress the path they are discussing would require those who came here illegally to learn English, pay back taxes and get behind those who sought green cards through legal avenues.

The group has also agreed illegal immigrants would not be able to seek permanent residency--the first step to citizenship-- until new border security and enforcement mechanisms are in place. They have envisioned about a 10-year wait for illegal immigrants to seek green cards.

“The best way to understand it is that what people are going to get here, ultimately, after a significant amount of time and after the security measures are in place, the only thing they’re going to get is the chance to apply for a green card,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).

Still, he said after much thought and going “back and forth” on the issue, he ultimately decided this year to sign on to plans that do allow those here illegally to eventually become citizens. “I just concluded that it’s not good for the country in the long-term to have millions and millions of people who can never, who are forever prohibited from becoming citizens,” he said.


A rising conservative star popular with the tea party--and a potential rival to Bush for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination--Rubio’s central role in the Senate group was underscored Tuesday, as Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (R-Nev.) derisively dismissed Bush’s comments in favor of Rubio’s efforts.

“Frankly, on this issue, I don’t think Jeb Bush is a Florida leader. I think Marco Rubio is. Bush has been elected to nothing lately. Rubio is the leader on immigration,” Reid told reporters.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
03-06-2013, 02:14 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Great news.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#3
03-06-2013, 01:55 PM
Senior Member
From Texas
Joined in Sep 2012
3,208 posts
msaccountant
130 AP
Even though I often disagree with Rubio I like that he is finally beginning to understand that supporting immigration reform and most importantly with a pathway to citzenship is crucial now if only the wait wasn't that long. I know there's nothing wrong with waiting but hasn't there been reports about the border already being secure enough?

I'm aware that this just might be a political move but quite honestly should that really matter to us as long as our families, our community is finally going to be able to adjust their status here?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
msaccountant
View Public Profile
Send a private message to msaccountant
Find all posts by msaccountant
#4
03-06-2013, 02:15 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
The media is overhyping this Jeb Bush guy. With all due respect, he is a nobody. He will have absolutely no say in whatever bill that passes through Congress. He is pretty much killed the slight chances that he had in becoming President by flip flopping. Let's stop worrying about him.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#5
03-07-2013, 09:09 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
260 posts
dreamerperson
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
The media is overhyping this Jeb Bush guy. With all due respect, he is a nobody. He will have absolutely no say in whatever bill that passes through Congress. He is pretty much killed the slight chances that he had in becoming President by flip flopping. Let's stop worrying about him.
Isn't the media quoting what he said/wrote in a book that recently came out? I bet it was written when the GOP decided the best thing to do was to alienate a rapidly growing demographic.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamerperson
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamerperson
Find all posts by dreamerperson
#6
03-07-2013, 02:56 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2010
3,742 posts
MIdreamer's Avatar
MIdreamer
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
The media is overhyping this Jeb Bush guy. With all due respect, he is a nobody. He will have absolutely no say in whatever bill that passes through Congress. He is pretty much killed the slight chances that he had in becoming President by flip flopping. Let's stop worrying about him.
I disagree, Jeb Bush is an important person in the Republican party. He might not have the voting power, but he can persuade other republicans into supporting CIR. Also, there is a large chance that he is going to run for presidency in the future, so he does matter in the discussion of CIR in my opinion.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
MIdreamer
View Public Profile
Send a private message to MIdreamer
Find all posts by MIdreamer
#7
03-07-2013, 04:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2010
504 posts
johnfreyan
0 AP
Whenever I see the words "Jeb Bush", I can't help but think about this.

Start at 2:17 for the money shot
__________________
(Application done by myself) Date delivered - 8/16/12 Nebraska
Date acceptance letter of application received - 8/20/12
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action (Application Approved) - 8/21/12
Date Biometrics scheduled - 9/12/12
Date of EAD Notification- 9/28/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
johnfreyan
View Public Profile
Send a private message to johnfreyan
Find all posts by johnfreyan


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.