• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

US Senate plan would deport illegal immigrants entering after 2011

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
04-14-2013, 07:42 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Quote:
WASHINGTON: U.S. senators crafting an immigration bill have agreed that foreigners who crossed the U.S. border illegally would be deported if they entered the United States after Dec. 31, 2011, a congressional aide said on Friday.

The legislation by a bipartisan group of senators would give the estimated 11 million immigrants living in the United States illegally a way to obtain legal status and eventually become U.S. citizens, provided certain measures are met.


But of the unauthorized immigrants, those who entered after the December 2011 cut-off date would be forced to go back to their country of origin, said the aide, who was not authorized to speak publicly because the bill is still being negotiated.

"People need to have been in the country long enough to have put down some roots. If you just got here and are illegal, then you can't stay," the congressional aide said.

The lawmakers - four Democrats and four Republicans - are aiming to unveil their bill on Tuesday, one day before the Senate Judiciary Committee is to hold a hearing to examine the legislation.

Senators and congressional aides have said that most major policy issues have been resolved. But some details still need to be worked out, said sources familiar with the negotiations.

Support has been growing among lawmakers and the public for immigration reform since President Barack Obama was re-elected in November with help from the Hispanic community.

The last time U.S. immigration laws were extensively rewritten was in 1986 and those policies have been blamed for allowing millions of people to enter and live in the country illegally, while also resulting in shortages of high-skilled workers from abroad, as well as some low-skilled wage-earners.

Under the bill being crafted, security would first be improved along the southwestern border with Mexico. At the same time, the threat of deportation would be lifted for many who are living in the U.S. illegally. Within 13 years of enactment, those immigrants could begin securing U.S. citizenship.

The bill would increase the number of visas issued for high-skilled workers and create a new program to control the flow of unskilled workers. It would also make it harder for U.S. citizens to petition for visas for their extended families.

http://articles.economictimes.indiat...ors-u-s-border
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#2
04-14-2013, 07:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Within 13 years of enactment, those immigrants could begin securing U.S. citizenship.

This part is wrong, as they would only qualify for a green card, once the border is deemed secure which could take who knows how many years, so even after the 10 years up, it could another 10 for them to say, "alright border looks secure now"
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#3
04-14-2013, 08:55 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
Thus the keyword is "could"

Nothings wrong with that statement
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#4
04-14-2013, 10:21 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
What if the undocumented has a I-130 pending now?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#5
04-14-2013, 10:28 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
DA USER why do you keep asking that? Like we really don't know until the actual bill is out on Tuesday. That should specify that and it will be like 1500 pages of I-130 goodness
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#6
04-14-2013, 10:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2013
253 posts
not_today
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
What if the undocumented has a I-130 pending now?
As a I-130 holder, I know that our cases would become current within the 10 year period following the passing of the bill if things go according to plan, that is, processing around 4 million cases in that time xD. You could potentially become a resident before you became eligible under their shit-plan.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
not_today
View Public Profile
Send a private message to not_today
Find all posts by not_today
#7
04-15-2013, 01:04 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
DA USER why do you keep asking that? Like we really don't know until the actual bill is out on Tuesday. That should specify that and it will be like 1500 pages of I-130 goodness
I understand but what is your prediction?

Quote:
Originally Posted by not_today View Post
As a I-130 holder, I know that our cases would become current within the 10 year period following the passing of the bill if things go according to plan, that is, processing around 4 million cases in that time xD. You could potentially become a resident before you became eligible under their shit-plan.
If CIR passes: So if the PD becomes current before the 10 years than then the current I-130 will apply? I hope so.

If CIR passes then the backlog will be cleared right? Therefore categories like F1 and F4 could move faster?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#8
04-15-2013, 01:17 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2013
253 posts
not_today
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
I understand but what is your prediction?



If CIR passes: So if the PD becomes current before the 10 years than then the current I-130 will apply? I hope so.
Yep. Pray to <deity/universe> that your petitioner doesn't die.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
If CIR passes then the backlog will be cleared right? Therefore categories like F1 and F4 could move faster?
That's the hope. The GO8 said that in 10 years USCIS will have processed all pre-CIR cases.
Last edited by not_today; 04-15-2013 at 01:19 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
not_today
View Public Profile
Send a private message to not_today
Find all posts by not_today
#9
04-15-2013, 01:26 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by not_today View Post
Yep. Pray to <deity/universe> that your petitioner doesn't die.

If that happens that the it would apply after 10 years as we have heard in the news.

Based on what I have read, I don't see a big difference between LPR and GC though,

That's the hope. The GO8 said that in 10 years USCIS will have processed all pre-CIR cases.
What do you mean? Which cases? The I-130's pending now? Including the ones from Mexico and Philipines?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#10
04-15-2013, 01:38 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2013
253 posts
not_today
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA User View Post
What do you mean? Which cases? The I-130's pending now? Including the ones from Mexico and Philipines?
Any kind of form. All of them. We are gonna make USCIS rich as fuck.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
not_today
View Public Profile
Send a private message to not_today
Find all posts by not_today
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.