• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

New substitute S.744 immigration bill?

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
05-01-2013, 10:24 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2007
1,414 posts
dreamact1982's Avatar
dreamact1982
0 AP
http://www.cnsnews.com/sites/default...ion%20Bill.pdf

In an e-mail shared with "The Right Views" by a Senate staffer, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) introduces a substitute bill to the controversial immigration bill and provides a PDF and a Word text file highlighting changes to the bill.

The e-mail from Schumer's office reads:

"Senators Schumer, Graham, Durbin, and Flake, or another Senator, may offer the attached amendment as a substitute to S. 744 at the markup scheduled for Thursday, May 9, 2013. A redline summary of the changes made to S.744, as filed on April 17, 2013, is attached. A document containing a summary of the changes made will be provided as soon as possible.


http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/craig-ba...migration-bill
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamact1982
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamact1982
Find all posts by dreamact1982
#2
05-01-2013, 12:31 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Quote:
“(iii) has earned a high school diploma or , a commensurate alternative 36 award from a public or private high school or secondary school, or has 37
obtained a general education development certificate recognized under State 1 law, or a high school equivalency diploma in the United States;

Quote:
i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in clause (ii), the Secretary may not 19 adjust the status of an alien to lawful permanent resident status under this section 20 unless the alien demonstrates that the alien satisfies the requirements of under 21 section 312(a) o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶I̶m̶m̶i̶g̶r̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶N̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶a̶l̶i̶t̶y̶ ̶A̶c̶t̶ ̶(̶8̶ ̶U̶.̶S̶.̶C̶.̶ ̶1̶4̶2̶3̶(̶a̶)̶)̶.̶


Quote:
“(i) REQUIREMENT FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS.—The Secretary shall utilize 33 biometric, biographic, and other data that the Secretary determines appropriate— 34
“(I) to conduct national security and law enforcement background checks 35 of an alien applying for lawful permanent resident status under this section; 36 and

Quote:
TO REGISTERED PROVISIONAL IMMIGRANTS AND 11 OTHERS. 12
“(a) Disclosures.—
such agency or of another entity approved b
̶b̶y̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶S̶e̶c̶r̶e̶t̶a̶r̶y̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶H̶o̶m̶e̶l̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶S̶e̶c̶u̶r̶i̶t̶y̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶2̶2̶ ̶e̶x̶a̶m̶i̶n̶e̶ ̶i̶n̶d̶i̶v̶i̶d̶u̶a̶l̶ ̶a̶p̶p̶l̶i̶c̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶h̶a̶v̶e̶ ̶b̶e̶e̶n̶ ̶f̶i̶l̶e̶d̶ ̶u̶n̶d̶e̶r̶ ̶e̶i̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶s̶u̶c̶h̶ ̶s̶e̶c̶t̶i̶o̶n̶.̶
to 23 examine any individual application for lawful status under section 245B, 245C, or 24 245D.

Quote:
“(A) a law enforcement agency, intelligence agency, national security agency, a 29 component of the Department of Homeland Security, court, or grand jury if such 30 information is requested by such entity, consistent with law, in connection with— 31
“(i) a criminal investigation or prosecution of any matter felony not related to 32 the applicant’s immigration status; or

a lot of changes, they dont look too bad


too many to post
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#3
05-01-2013, 01:00 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal
Joined in Aug 2012
5,123 posts
g33k
0 AP
Read the comments on that page lol
__________________


"Throw yourself off a cliff and build your wings on the way down." -Ray Bradbury
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
g33k
View Public Profile
Send a private message to g33k
Find all posts by g33k
#4
05-01-2013, 01:02 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,110 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
It maintains the entry requirement age at 16, no age cap, DREAM Act beneficiaries as well as those already granted DACA qualify after 5 years for Permanent Residency with the preceeding time in provisional status automatically pro-rated to count as 5 years of lawful status towards citizenship.

Only thing that sucks (for me, at least) is that if you have a final order you do have to file a motion to reopen rather than it being automatically void/invalidated when you're granted provisional status.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#5
05-01-2013, 02:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
381 posts
Morrow's Avatar
Morrow
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09 View Post
if you have a final order you do have to file a motion to reopen rather than it being automatically void/invalidated when you're granted provisional status.
ah crap
__________________
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Morrow
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Morrow
Find all posts by Morrow
#6
05-01-2013, 02:31 PM
Senior Member
From South Florida
Joined in Aug 2012
531 posts
arclite
0 AP
I hope this is enough to appease the House.
__________________
EAD 3rd Renewed:9/25/16
AP Sent:7/27|Approved 10/05| Travel on AP: 11/7-11| AOS Packet Sent 11/26| Del: 11/28 | Bio 12/28 | Case Is Ready To Be Scheduled For An Interview 1/4|Rec Interview Notification 12/26| Interview 1/30/18| AOS Approved 2/13.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
arclite
View Public Profile
Send a private message to arclite
Find all posts by arclite
#7
05-01-2013, 03:59 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2012
298 posts
dude33
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by g33k View Post
Read the comments on that page lol
lol one dude says 20 million people are out of work lol wow red neck news
__________________
Date Application Sent - 8/21/2012/Delivered-8/23
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action- 08/28/2012
Date Biometrics scheduled - 9/24/12 Walk in: 9-13-12
Date of EAD approved - 10/29/12 Date received -11/03/12 Applied for S.S 11/06/12 Date S.S received 11/10/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dude33
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dude33
Find all posts by dude33
#8
05-01-2013, 06:15 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
131 posts
Giancoli
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dude33 View Post
lol one dude says 20 million people are out of work lol wow red neck news
I know, sometimes I can't believe how much smarter we are than these 'Americans'. It's like, bitch you don't deserve your citizenship gimme that ishhh.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Giancoli
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Giancoli
Find all posts by Giancoli
#9
05-01-2013, 07:15 PM
Senior Member
From FL
Joined in Sep 2010
238 posts
YoTaZ's Avatar
YoTaZ
0 AP
oh crap x3 on the motion to re open thing, i wanted to travel before the end of the year
__________________
App sent - 9/11 regular ups mail --- Received - 9/14 Routed to Vermont --- G1145 email - 9/19 (text never came in) --- Receipts by mail - 9/21 --- Biometrics notice - 9/26 for 10/11 --- Walk-in - 09/27 Approved - 04/26/13 EAD 05/01/13 (7 MONTHS 19 DAYS since that day i hesitantly shipped the package)
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
YoTaZ
View Public Profile
Send a private message to YoTaZ
Find all posts by YoTaZ
#10
05-02-2013, 01:04 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,110 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Forcing individuals to file a motion to reopen and terminate/dismiss a deportation order is a burden to the courts and to the immigrant, plus it will divert the thousands of dollars that the incompetent immigration bar members (lawyers) will want to charge people to "file" it.

Really, people will have to have thousands to apply, to pay their back taxes, to save for school, to save to start their own businesses now that they won't be allowed to "not work" for more than 60 days in a decade, etc, etc. Whose bright idea was this?

Has anyone else read most of the new Senate bill? I did this afternoon, and now I want the previous version back. Still, better than the ridiculous House bill custom-build for the GOP instead of immigration reform. Sigh...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.