• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

May

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

In boost to immigration reform prospects, senators unveil "border surge" plan

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
06-20-2013, 05:23 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and John Hoeven, R-S.D., announced an agreement to strengthen border security as part of a comprehensive immigration reform bill on Thursday, potentially clearing yet another hurdle from the path of reform proponents as they seek to muscle a bipartisan bill through both houses of Congress.

The border security proposals, which Hoeven and Corker said they hope to officially introduce as an amendment later on Thursday, would double the number of Border Patrol agents, bringing the total to 40,000, and it would also significantly expand the use of surveillance technology along the border, including unmanned drones, cameras, and ground sensors. The amendment would also double the amount of border fencing required under the immigration reform proposal, from 350 to 700 miles. Currently there are approximately 40 miles of fencing along the southern border.

According to the amendment's sponsors, all of the border security enhancements must be fully installed and operational before a path to legal permanent residency opens up for the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living in America. Sponsors, in addition to Hoeven and Corker, include Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., John McCain, R-Ariz., Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., and Marco Rubio, R-Fla.

The amendment would also make the availability of green cards contingent upon the successful implementation of the national E-Verify system, which prevents employers from hiring undocumented workers, and the national entry-exit system, which tracks visa holders to ensure they don't overstay their welcome.

Announcing the agreement on the Senate floor Thursday, Hoeven said, "Americans want immigration reform...but they want us to get it right. And that means first and foremost securing the border." He touted the proposal as a "straightforward" plan that relies on "objective, verifiable standards and metrics" to ensure border security.

Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Corker each described the amendment as a "border surge," framing the proposal as an unprecedented show of commitment to border security.

McCain, a member of the "gang of eight" senators who have been slogging away at immigration reform for months, told Hoeven and Corker he was "very, very grateful" for their efforts to defuse the border security fight, which has threatened to derail the comprehensive reform effort.

McCain added that the head of the Border Patrol has "assured" him that, if the border security enhancements in the amendment materialize, authorities would have 100 percent situational awareness of the situation along the southern border, and 90 percent control.

Opponents of the immigration reform bill largely came out against the border security amendment on Thursday, saying they remain unconvinced that the bill would ensure border security before opening a path to citizenship for undocumented residents.

Opponents particularly seized on the distinction between provisional legal status, which is an interim condition derided by opponents as "amnesty," and permanent legal residency, more commonly known as a "green card." They argued that the border security amendment would only prohibit undocumented workers from receiving their green card until the border is secured, but that it would technically legalize their residency in the United States immediately.

"Under this legislation, amended or not, amnesty will occur," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. "It will be first," with only a "promise of the future enforcement."

Sessions was echoed by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who said the reform bill would make the mistake of "legalizing undocumented workers without first securing the borders."

"Throwing more money at the problem without results doesn't make sense," he argued. "There's no guarantee the money will be used or the programs implemented."

That charge was rebutted by Graham on Thursday: "If you hire the border patrol agents and put them on the border, they're not going to read a comic book, they're going to do their job."

If the border security amendment is adopted and the broader reform package passes the Senate, the fight for immigration reform still faces a tough road in the Republican-controlled House. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Thursday that "immigration reform must be grounded in real border security," signaling that any proposal that strengthens the border security provisions in the Senate bill would ease its passage in the lower chamber.

But at least one key House lawmaker did not seem particularly enthused about the border security amendment due to be unveiled Thursday, accusing the senators behind the amendment of "throwing bodies" at the border in a way that will "not solve" the problem.

"The main problem here is that 35 to 40 percent of people who are not lawfully in the united states enter the country lawfully - visitors visas, business visas, student visa other types of visas," said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, which is moving ahead with an immigration reform proposal of its own. "What you do on the border is important, but...fixing that does not solve the problem of enforcement."
Source

So, certain criteria must be met before LPR is granted. I guess RPI will be granted and there will be no movement to the second phase of the path to citizenship until these benchmarks are met.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
Last edited by freshh.; 06-20-2013 at 05:27 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
#2
06-20-2013, 05:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2007
1,617 posts
frbc13's Avatar
frbc13
0 AP
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
frbc13
View Public Profile
Send a private message to frbc13
Find all posts by frbc13
#3
06-20-2013, 05:48 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
629 posts
desice's Avatar
desice
0 AP
Compromise. I like it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
desice
View Public Profile
Send a private message to desice
Find all posts by desice
#4
06-20-2013, 08:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,161 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
I know that I will benefit from CIR and and have been waiting for the opportunity for a long time, but...

What a crock of s***, move the military expense from the Middle East to Mexico and in the process treat the border with Mexico as an enemy state; add thousands to the Federal payroll (which the Repubs are ALWAYS ranting against) and this way there isn't an increase in "National Defense" spending, it simply relocates and redistributes the waste. I wonder if the American citizenry realizes this.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#5
06-20-2013, 08:48 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2007
2,690 posts
CIR_DREAM2009
210 AP
^ Yeah, and the use of "surge" language to the border that was previously used to quell a terrorist insurgency in Iraq is especially galling.
__________________
EAD/DACA Renewal: 10/8/2014
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CIR_DREAM2009
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CIR_DREAM2009
Find all posts by CIR_DREAM2009
#6
06-20-2013, 08:52 PM
Member
Joined in Feb 2009
61 posts
Airmarshall's Avatar
Airmarshall
0 AP
Quote:
That charge was rebutted by Graham on Thursday: "If you hire the border patrol agents and put them on the border, they're not going to read a comic book, they're going to do their job."
I love Lindsay Graham.... he is so matter of fact in the way he talks.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Airmarshall
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Airmarshall
Find all posts by Airmarshall
#7
06-20-2013, 09:30 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2013
819 posts
Tonyhasadream's Avatar
Tonyhasadream
0 AP
20,000 jobs! But someone will complain anyways.
__________________
Delivered to Nebraska: 3/19
Biometrics appointment date: 4/24 no walk in.
RFE: 3/25/2014
RFE received: 4/10/2014
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Tonyhasadream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Tonyhasadream
Find all posts by Tonyhasadream
#8
06-20-2013, 09:39 PM
Junior Member
From Riverside
Joined in Jul 2012
29 posts
StepUp
0 AP
So not even us DREAMers will be able to obtain LPR until they secure the border??
__________________
Application Sent - March 1st (Nebraska Service Center) Application & Receipt received at USCIS - March 12th Biometrics App Letter Received - April 1st Biometrics App Scheduled - April 22nd DACA Approval Received - June 17th EAD Received - June 17th
Riverside, CALIFORNIA
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
StepUp
View Public Profile
Send a private message to StepUp
Find all posts by StepUp
#9
06-20-2013, 09:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,572 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by StepUp View Post
So not even us DREAMers will be able to obtain LPR until they secure the border??
Even with this amendment,Dreamers and Agjobs applicants will be able to gain LPR in the appropriate time that is currently in the bill.I saw one of the Republican Senators of the amendment mentioned this earlier.The amendment seems ok.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#10
06-21-2013, 01:12 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
I think this is the biggest breakthrough in passing CIR overall folks. I like that they are adding stuff to Border Security which exactly what GOP wants.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.