Senators urge House to take up immigration reform

Ianus · 06-27-2013, 07:21 PM

http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/27/se...ation-reform/?

Quote:

After the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act passed in the Senate Thursday, lawmakers are wasting no time encouraging the lower chamber to take up reform.

“Take up immigration on your own timetable and the way you would like to see it happen — just address the issue,” South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham said Thursday. “If you don’t like our bill, do one of your own.”

Graham, a Gang of Eight member who co-sponsored and co-authored the Senate bill, expressed optimism about passage through the House, and said the Senate was sending the bill out “with a lot of wind to its back.”

“I don’t think they’re going to shy away from it — I mean, folks in the House aren’t afraid of dealing with tough issues,” Georgia Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss told reporters Thursday. “The end result they want to achieve, I just think, is going to be entirely different from the approach over here.”

In a press conference following the Senate vote, several ‘Gang of Eight’ senators together urged the House to tackle their own version of immigration form without delay – after which both chambers can conference a compromise on a single version for the president to sign.

“The bill has generated a level of (bipartisan) support that we believe it will be impossible for the House to ignore,” New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer said. “In the coming months, our colleagues in the House will hear a drum beat of support for our bill that will start tomorrow and won’t let up.”

The 68-32 vote, including 14 Republicans, will likely face a tough fight in the hardline-conservative controlled House, where Speaker John Boehner said this morning he will subject any immigration legislation to the Hastert Rule — meaning a majority of Republicans will have to support the bill before it can come to the floor.

“We want to carefully address this with our House colleagues respecting the equal role they play in crafting any legislation,” Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain said after the vote. “One thing I am confident that the members of the House agree on, and that is the status quo of de facto amnesty of 11 million people in this country is unacceptable.”

Senators opposing the bill were equally candid in expressing their feeling to the House, where they hope the changes and amendments defeated in the Senate stand a better chance of making it into the final bill.

“I think this is halftime in the game, because certainly no matter what the Senate does, the House has a different approach, and I think in all probability the bill will continue to move in a direction that the House would favor,” Texas Republican Whip Sen. John Cornyn said. “I would actually like to see an immigration reform bill, but not this one.”

Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, one of the most outspoken members against immigration reform, expects the House to break the Senate bill down into separate pieces of legislation for individual consideration.

“They’re going to be much more tough,” the Texas Republican said prior to Thursday’s vote. “But I think they have intentions of getting a bill to conference.”

In response to the Hastert Rule roadblock laid down by Speaker Boehner this morning, New York Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer had one final piece of parting advice for the House.

“You’ll get many House members saying ‘I wish it would pass, but I don’t want to vote for it.’ There’s a logical solution — put the bill on the floor, and it will pass. And many of those who don’t want to vote for it on the Republican side won’t have to,” Schumer said.

I think Grassley brought up an interesting option concerning the House.House Republicans could simply break up the Senate bill and vote on it in individual sections.

Optimism12 · 06-27-2013, 07:25 PM

Grassley is fucking hopeless. just like Sessions Cruz and Cornyn

theyre always gonna vote against any reform bill at the end of the day

butterflynans · 06-27-2013, 07:33 PM

So what does it entail? How they short change us?

Pianoswithoutfaith · 06-27-2013, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by butterflynans

So what does it entail? How they short change us?

What do you mean

butterflynans · 06-27-2013, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith

What do you mean

Someone elsewhere said they low ball us

butterflynans · 06-27-2013, 08:17 PM

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/news/sen...143951088.html

DreamBig09 · 06-27-2013, 09:02 PM

I predict the House wont take action until Spring of next week. BELIEVE ME. Boner will not bring the bill up.

j83 · 06-27-2013, 09:16 PM

I really think we are witnessing the remaking of 2006 when the senate passed a similar bill and the house passed a totally different bill at opposite sides of the spectrum. The bills were so different that they didn't even go into conference and it died. With that said, I'm hoping I'm wrong...

Charolastra · 06-27-2013, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DreamBig09

I predict the House wont take action until Spring of next week. BELIEVE ME. Boner will not bring the bill up.

"Spring of next week"? What do you mean?

Task_1539 · 06-27-2013, 10:01 PM

lmao you know what he means.

They need you!

Forum links

Resources

Join our list

National calendar of events

February

Senators urge House to take up immigration reform