• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

GOP immigration chief open to citizenship path

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
07-11-2013, 06:21 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...nship/2510021/
Quote:
WASHINGTON - Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., has long said that the nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants should never get a "special" pathway to citizenship. But for the first time, he is saying they could get some path.

Goodlatte, who holds considerable influence over the immigration debate as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said during an interview taped Thursday for C-SPAN's Newsmakers that he could see a plan where adult undocumented immigrants are given a temporary legal status, and could later apply for green cards and U.S. citizenship.


"To create a new category for people who came in here illegally does not sit well with a great many Americans," Goodlatte said. But, "I and other members are open-minded to the idea that they should have a way to come out of the shadows, to be able to work, to have their own businesses, to pay their taxes, to travel back and forth to their home country and elsewhere."

After attaining that status, Goodlatte said they could then apply for legal permanent residence and eventually U.S. citizenship through avenues that are already available to foreigners: marrying a U.S. citizen, having a U.S. citizen relative petition for them or having a U.S. employer sponsor their application.

"All of those are ways that they could then eventually find themselves permanent residents and ultimately citizens," Goodlatte said. "But none of those are special ways that have been made available only to people who are here illegally."

Figuring out what to do with the nation's unauthorized immigrants is one of the most contentious issues in the immigration debate and could sink any hopes of a rewrite of the nation's immigration laws.

The Senate passed a bill last month that allows the nation's undocumented immigrants to be placed in a temporary legal status where they can live and work legally, and then apply for their green cards 10 years later and U.S. citizenship three years after that.

House Republicans have resisted that plan, with some like Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, calling it "amnesty" for people who've broken the law and others, like Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., proposing a middle ground where people can get "long-term" guest worker visas, but not citizenship.

Democrats have fought back, saying any bill that doesn't allow the nation's undocumented immigrants to eventually become U.S. citizens will not be accepted. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said such a bill would not pass the Senate, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said those proposals would receive no Democratic support.

Goodlatte is also embracing an idea to provide a quicker path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children, known as DREAMers after a failed bill in Congress designed to help them. He is working with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., on a bill aimed at that population, and said his committee will hold a hearing on it before the end of the month.

The interview will air Sunday on C-SPAN and 10 a.m. and 6 p.m.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
07-11-2013, 06:32 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
After attaining that status, Goodlatte said they could then apply for legal permanent residence and eventually U.S. citizenship through avenues that are already available to foreigners: marrying a U.S. citizen, having a U.S. citizen relative petition for them or having a U.S. employer sponsor their application.
Why am I not surprised?

All of this is a tactic to decrease the number of eligible voters in the future. They're convinced that there are not enough potential CIR beneficiaries with ties to the country to become citizens through existing channels...after all aren't they eliminating certain family categories? And changing the employment rules?

And if this is what comes out of conference, the Democrats either kill it and look like they were never serious about CIR or just take what the Republicans are offering.

I guess it could be worse.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
Last edited by freshh.; 07-11-2013 at 06:38 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
#3
07-11-2013, 07:27 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
2,113 posts
VeryNicePerson1's Avatar
VeryNicePerson1
0 AP
The Dream Act they're cooking up is looking to be strict as hell.

They are emphasizing that it will probably only apply to very young individuals (not young adults)

So expect no more than maybe 15 or 16 years old age cap at the time of the bills passage.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VeryNicePerson1
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VeryNicePerson1
Find all posts by VeryNicePerson1
#4
07-11-2013, 11:05 PM
Senior Member
From California
Joined in Jan 2009
1,438 posts
Dreamer X's Avatar
Dreamer X
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by VeryNicePerson1 View Post
The Dream Act they're cooking up is looking to be strict as hell.

They are emphasizing that it will probably only apply to very young individuals (not young adults)

So expect no more than maybe 15 or 16 years old age cap at the time of the bills passage.
Yeah and you probably need some weird requirement like wearing an ankle bracelet and drug testing. -_- If it's going to be watered down as f*ck might as not do anything and wait til the 2014 elections where the some of the stupid repubs would be gone.
__________________
"I shall seize Fate by the throat; it shall certainly not bend and crush me completely" -Ludwig von Beethoven
Last edited by Dreamer X; 07-11-2013 at 11:08 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dreamer X
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dreamer X
Find all posts by Dreamer X
#5
07-11-2013, 11:29 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
I think House should pass something. I think I would be happy with an indirect path to USC.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#6
07-11-2013, 11:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,110 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamer X View Post
Yeah and you probably need some weird requirement like wearing an ankle bracelet and drug testing. -_- If it's going to be watered down as f*ck might as not do anything and wait til the 2014 elections where the some of the stupid repubs would be gone.
Nooooo, see that's what both Repubs and Dems want; to use us for THEIR political gain. This issue needs to be off the table this year. We will gain by waiting exactly what we've gained now...nothing. Time is of essence because it means the opportunity is currently present, can you imagine the Dems saying "well, we have a weak candidate for Pres, so we'll just wait four years until a really good one comes along for whom we can advocate. Of course not.

I swear, this is exactly what the "non-profit" machines who receive political support from the White House and $$$$ at the expense of 'advocating for immigrants' are salivating for, salivating at the thought of having two more years of raking in donations to "push for CIR". I'm sorry, who exactly has been making noise out there for us since the Senate passed the bill? *Silence*. Even Univision would be expected to be flaming the Republican House, but I watched it this p.m., just to check, and not really showing much outrage at all. These people keep getting elected and these organizations keep getting millions and millions and everything stays the same. THEY have a vested interest in CIR not passing - the Dems have to defend 20 Senate seats come 2014 and if CIR passes, well...what exactly do they campaign on?? Failed gun control? Failed environmental regulation? National spying scandals? IRS scandal? We have Senate Dem retirements coming soon, too. Anyone else see a pattern?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.